Cited by 1,217Economic Growth and ProductivityEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentGender, Labor, and Family Dynamics

The Productivity Argument for Investing in Young Children

Heckman, James J., Masterov, Dimitriy V.·2007·Review of Agricultural Economics

Abstract

T his article presents the case for investing more in young American children who grow up in disadvantaged environments.Figure 1 graphs time series of alternative measures of the percentage of children in disadvantaged families.The percentage of children born into, or living in, nontraditional families has increased greatly in the past thirty years. 1,2 Approximately 25% of children are now born into single parent homes.While the percentages of children living in poverty and born into poor families have fallen recently, they are still high, especially among certain subgroups.Adverse environments place children at risk for social and economic failure.The accident of birth plays a powerful role in determining adult success. 3 Many have commented on this phenomenon, and most analyses have cast the issue of assisting children from disadvantaged families as a question of fairness or social justice.This article makes a different argument.We argue that, on productivity grounds, it makes sense to invest in young children from disadvantaged environments.Substantial evidence shows that these children are more likely to commit crime, have out-of-wedlock births, and drop out of school.Early interventions that partially remediate the effects of adverse environments can reverse some of the harm of disadvantage and have a high economic return.They benefit not only the children themselves, but also their children, as well as society at large.Investing in disadvantaged young children is a rare public policy with no equity-efficiency tradeoff.It reduces the inequality associated with the accident of birth and at the same time raises the productivity of society at large.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9353.2007.00359.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heckman, J. J., & Masterov, D. V.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Review of Agricultural Economics
Published
2007-09
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
446-493
ISSN
  • 1058-7195 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9353
OpenAlex
W1837190689
Cited by
1,217
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 137 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 101 · 2015: 64 · 2014: 72 · 2013: 81 · 2012: 67
FWCI
88.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Review of Agricultural Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Keywords
early childhood investment, productivity, child development, human capital

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review