Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 257

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 155 of the 155 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The New Comparative Economics

Open access
Djankov, Simeon, Glaeser, Edward, Porta, Rafael La, Lopez-de-Silane, Florencio, Shleifer, Andrei·2003·National Bureau of Economic Research

Abstract

In recent years, comparative economics experienced a revival, with a new focus on comparing capitalist economies.The theme of the new research is that institutions exert a profound influence on economic development.We argue that, to understand capitalist institutions, one needs to understand the basic tradeoff between the costs of disorder and those of dictatorship.We then apply this logic to study the structure of efficient institutions, the consequences of colonial transplantation, and the politics of institutional choice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3386/w9608

Cites

155 of 155 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 155 references

Cited by

See all 257

Metadata

Authors
Djankov, S., Glaeser, E., Porta, R. L., Lopez-de-Silane, F., & Shleifer, A.
Venue
National Bureau of Economic Research
Published
2003-04
OpenAlex
W2140269385
Cited by
257
References
155
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The New Comparative Economics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/w9608
The paper
Djankov, S., Glaeser, E., Porta, R. L., Lopez-de-Silane, F., & Shleifer, A. (2003). The New Comparative Economics. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w9608

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.