Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 308

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Measuring the Well-Being of the Poor Using Income and Consumption

Open access
Meyer, Bruce, Sullivan, James·2003·National Bureau of Economic Research

Abstract

We evaluate consumption and income measures of the material well-being of the poor.We begin with conceptual and pragmatic reasons that favor income or consumption.Then, we empirically examine the quality of standard data by studying measurement error and under-reporting, and by comparing micro-data from standard surveys to administrative micro-data and aggregates.We also compare low reports of income and consumption to other measures of hardship and well-being.The closer link between consumption and well-being and its better measurement favors the use of consumption when setting benefits and evaluating transfer programs.However, income retains its convenience for determining program eligibility.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3386/w9760

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

See all 308

Metadata

Authors
Meyer, B., & Sullivan, J.
Venue
National Bureau of Economic Research
Published
2003-06
OpenAlex
W2891785047
Cited by
308
References
29
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring the Well-Being of the Poor Using Income and Consumption. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/w9760
The paper
Meyer, B., & Sullivan, J. (2003). Measuring the Well-Being of the Poor Using Income and Consumption. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w9760

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.