Cited by 25Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics

Development of a Post-stroke Upper Limb Rehabilitation Wearable Sensor for Use in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Pilot Validation Study

Open access
Hughes, Charmayne M. L., Louie, Alexander, Sun, Selena, Gordon-Murer, Chloe, Belay, Gashaw Jember, Baye, Moges, Zhang, Xiaorong·2019·Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology

Abstract

The development of context-appropriate sensor technologies could alleviate the significant burden of stroke in Sub-Saharan African rehabilitation clinicians and health care facilities. However, many commercially available wearable sensors are beyond the financial capabilities of the majority of African persons. In this study, we evaluated the concurrent validity of a low-cost wearable sensor (i.e., the outREACH sensor) to measure upper limb movement kinematics of 31 healthy persons, using an 8-camera Vicon motion capture system as the reference standard. The outREACH sensor showed high correlation (r range: 0.808 to 0.990) and agreement (mean difference range: -1.60 to 1.10) with the reference system regardless of task or kinematic parameter. Moreover, Bland-Altman analyses indicated that there were no significant systematic errors present. This study indicates that upper limb movement kinematics can be accurately measured using the outREACH sensor, and have the potential to enhance stroke evaluation and rehabilitation in sub-Saharan Africa.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00322

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only 1 (2%) mHealth intervention used a wearable sensor-based approach.

    “Only 1 (2%) mHealth interventions used a wearable sensor-based approach.”

    From Current evidence on the use of mHealth approaches in Sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review (2023) · cites this paper as [48]

    The Methods (Apparatus; page unavailable) describe a wearable sensor, so the paper supports identifying a sensor-based approach. But the Discussion says integration into the outREACH mHealth application was planned, and the paper reports a sensor-validation study, not an mHealth intervention. It does not establish the count of one or the 2% figure. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The wearable sensor based mHealth approach is on pilot test stage.

    “The other category of mHealth approaches which is based on wearable sensors [48] is on pilot test stage”

    From Current evidence on the use of mHealth approaches in Sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review (2023) · cites this paper as [48]

    The Abstract describes a pilot validation of the outREACH wearable sensor in 31 healthy participants. The Discussion says integration of the sensor into the outREACH mHealth application is planned, so the paper supports a pilot-stage sensor but not a pilot test of the integrated mHealth approach or wearable-sensor approaches as a category. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The first paper [48] discusses the design of a wearable sensor-based mHealth system.

    “The first paper [48] discusses about the design of a wearable sensor based mHealth system”

    From Current evidence on the use of mHealth approaches in Sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review (2023) · cites this paper as [48]

    Methods > Apparatus describes the design and components of the wearable outREACH sensor. The Discussion links it to an mHealth application but says integrating the sensor into that application is future work; the paper does not describe a completed wearable sensor–based mHealth system. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Across the inspected literature, the design and development of wearable sensor-based mHealth approaches is reported only in two papers ([48] and [61]).

    “However, across the inspected literature, the design and develop­ ment of wearable sensors based mHealth approaches is only reported in [48,61].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hughes, C. M. L., Louie, A., Sun, S., Gordon-Murer, C., Belay, G. J., Baye, M., & Zhang, X.
Affiliations
  • San Francisco State University (US)
  • University of Gondar (ET)
Corresponding author
Hughes, Charmayne M. L.
Venue
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Published
2019-11-12
Volume
7
Pages
322-322
ISSN
2296-4185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2983513247
Cited by
25
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1752255)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Keywords
wearable sensors, stroke rehabilitation, concurrent validity, motion capture comparison, sub-Saharan Africa, stroke assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review