Cited by 29DNA and Biological ComputingCellular Automata and ApplicationsGene Regulatory Network Analysis

Chemical neural networks inside synthetic cells? A proposal for their realization and modeling

Open access
Gentili, Pier Luigi, Stano, Pasquale·2022·Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology

Abstract

The exciting sci-tech arena of synthetic biology (SB) provides concepts, tools, and approaches for fundamental revolutions in basic and applied research.SB plays a key role when it is conceived as one of the branches of the "sciences of the artificial" (Cordeschi, 2002;Damiano et al., 2011), together with artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics.In particular, SB contributes to the wetware approaches, which are complementary to the software and hardware ones that characterize the other two most well-known branches.In this perspective, SB offers the unique opportunity of devising novel chemical versions of AI, whose main feature is embodiment, i.e., forms, systems, networks that compute through physical interactions (not based on the abstract representations typical of AI), and that potentially display autonomous adaptive/plastic dynamics (in contrast to mechanical robots).SB, then, can be seen as an experimental platform for unconventional computing, based on (bio)chemicals, organized structures, and reactions.Operations, even when interpreted by observers in terms of logical representations, actually lie in the material domain.As such, operations (reactions, interactions, synthesis and degradation of the operators) and the operators themselves (the molecules performing or subjected to the operations) are truly interwoven, and definitely cancel the distinction between hardware and software, typical of non-chemical machines.In this opinion paper, we aim at sketching a possible implementation of embodied, chemical AI by means of SB tools.In particular, we will focus on bottom-up approaches and on the socalled synthetic (or artificial) cells (SCs or ACs) (Luisi 2002; Salehi-Reyhan et al., 2017;Göpfrich et al., 2018;Guindani et al., 2022), Figure 1A.In the past few years, indeed, the worldwide community of SC practitioners has generated a very relevant momentum, promoted by the onset of numerous consortia and projects (Schwille et al., 2018;Frischmon et al., 2021).The question we would like to deal with is the following: is it possible to devise minimal forms of perceptive chemical AI in SCs?Because of its widespread relevance since the beginning of AI, the system we look at is a chemical perceptron (a chemical neural network), and we will discuss its possible implementation inside SCs.We will first introduce the motif of "phospho-neural networks" (Hellingwerf et al., 1995) and a plan for implanting such networks in SCs, calling for a specific design that would address both experimental feasibility, detailed modeling, and non-trivial behavior.We also suggest that the exploration and the interpretation of chemical networks' dynamics, especially when they are based on macromolecular elements, is best pursued according to fuzzy logic.Finally, a short comment on the theoretical relevance of these approaches on the more general problem of embodying AI in the chemical domain will complete the paper.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fbioe.2022.927110

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Chemical neural networks operate by generating activation and deactivation of their own components, a form of gene expression regulation.

    “These networks operate by generating activation and deactivation of its own components, a form of gene expression regulation.”

    From Wetware network-based AI: a chemical approach to embodied cognition for robotics and artificial intelligence (2026) · cites this paper as Gentili and Stano, 2022

    In “A Synthetic Biology Platform for Embodied Chemical AI” (page unavailable), the paper describes sensors activating response regulators that modify gene expression. In “Two-Component Signaling Systems Engrafted Into Synthetic Cells” (page unavailable), it presents regulation of the network’s own components as a future goal, not an established way these networks operate; the cited passages also do not establish deactivation of those components. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gentili, P. L., & Stano, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Perugia (IT)
  • University of Salento (IT)
Corresponding author
  • Gentili, Pier Luigi
  • Stano, Pasquale
Venue
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Published
2022-06-06
Volume
10
Pages
927110-927110
ISSN
2296-4185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4281960506
Cited by
29
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 2
FWCI
2.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • AIRUS (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Università degli Studi Roma Tre
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Biological Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Cellular Automata and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Keywords
artificial cells, chemical computing, embodied AI, bottom-up approach, chemical logic gates

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review