Cited by 2Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug ReactionsComplementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesProbiotics and Fermented Foods

A pharmacovigilance study on probiotic preparations based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System from 2005 to 2023

Open access
Wang, Yitong, Tan, Weifu, Li, Xuyang, Yang, Guangli, Wang, Yunxiao, Liao, Jing, Lu, Aner, Zhang, Guoqing +3 more·2025·Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology

Abstract

Background: Probiotics are recognized as beneficial foods, but adverse reactions reported by individuals still exist. This study aims to analysis adverse events (AE) related to probiotics from the FAERS database from the first quarter (Q1) of 2005 to the fourth quarter (Q4) of 2023. Methods: The AE data related to probiotic from the 2005 Q1 to the 2023 Q4 were collected. R language was applied to analyze the standardized AE data and three algorithms including the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR) and the empirical Bayes geometric mean (EBGM) were used to identify AE signals. Results: In this study, 10,698,312 reports were collected from the FAERS database, of which 74 probiotic-related adverse events were reported. About one third of the reported cases were older than 60 years.36.36% of the reported cases required Hospitalization. A total of 285 preference terms (PTS) and 15 system organ classes (SOC) were identified. In the overall analysis, only 9 PTs and 2 SOCs met significant disproportionality for all three algorithms simultaneously. SOCs included Gastrointestinal disorders (N=97, ROR=5.3, PRR=3.84, EBGM=3.84) and Hepatobiliary disorders (N=9, ROR =3.39, PRR=3.32, EBGM=3.32). PTs included Gastrointestinal pain (ROR=77.76, PRR=76.69, EBGM=76.63), Hypophagia (ROR=24.13, PRR=23.88, EBGM=28.88), and Hepatobiliary disorders (N=97, ROR=5.3, PRR=3.84, EBGM=3.84) and Flatulence (ROR=23.75, PRR=23.28, EBGM=23.27) were the top four highest. Meanwhile, s found new unique adverse signals such as Agitation (ROR=12.48, PRR=12.32, EBGM=12.32) and Anxiety (ROR=4.10, PRR=4.04, EBGM=4.04). Additionally, subgroup analyses were performed to identify AE signals based on gender and age. Metabolism and nutrition disorders (N=6, ROR=3.21, PRR=3.04, EBGM=3.04) and Asthenia (N=3, ROR=5.9, PRR=5.71, EBGM=5.71) were unique AE signal for the male group. Conclusion: Although, the risk of adverse reactions arising from the application of probiotics cannot be ignored. However, However, the results of this FAERS-based study continue to support the overall safety of probiotic preparations. It is necessary to pay attention to the potential influence of factors such as gender and age on the effects and adverse reactions of probiotic application in basic research and clinical application.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1455735

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Eum S. Ock M. Lee S. Kim H. (2019). Adverse events and concurrent medications associated with parenteral nutrition use. Basic. Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 124, 154– 162. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.2019.124.issue-2 30133153 · DOI
  2. Evans S. J. Waller P. C. Davis S. (2001). Use of proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) for signal generation from spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 10, 483– 486. doi: 10.1002/pds.v10:6 11828828 · DOI
  3. Rothman K. J. Lanes S. Sacks S. T. (2004). The reporting odds ratio and its advantages over the proportional reporting ratio. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 13, 519– 523. doi: 10.1002/pds.v13:8 15317031 · DOI
  4. Salminen M. K. Rautelin H. Tynkkynen S. Poussa T. Saxelin M. Valtonen V.. (2004). Lactobacillus bacteremia, clinical significance, and patient outcome, with special focus on probiotic L. rhamnosus GG. Clin. Infect. Dis. 38, 62– 69. doi: 10.1086/cid.2004.38.issue-1 14679449 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, Y., Tan, W., Li, X., Yang, G., Wang, Y., Liao, J., Lu, A., Zhang, G., Chen, K., Yang, L., & Li, W.
Affiliations
Jinan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Li, Wei
Venue
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
Published
2025-05-13
Volume
15
Pages
1455735-1455735
ISSN
2235-2988 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4410331721
Cited by
2
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Keywords
probiotics, adverse drug reactions, pharmacovigilance, FDA Adverse Event Reporting System, disproportionality analysis, reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, gastrointestinal diseases, hepatobiliary diseases, hypophagia, flatulence, agitation, anxiety, adverse event signals, older adults, hospitalization, System Organ Class, probiotic safety
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Algorithms, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Middle Aged, United States, United States Food and Drug Administration, Databases, Factual, Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems, Probiotics, Young Adult, Pharmacovigilance, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review