The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Retrieval-based concept mapping makes a difference as a retrieval practice activity: a study with high school students
Abstract
Introduction: While specific sequences of retrieval-based activities have been shown to have a powerful effect on learning, no previous study has examined this issue in children or adolescents. Here, we aimed to determine whether the benefit of concept mapping as an initial retrieval activity observed previously with college students in a lab setting may also be found in younger and less experienced students in a more naturalistic school setting. Methods: After a short training in concept mapping, participants (N = 60) read an educational text and then engaged in a sequence of two learning activities that required them to retrieve relevant ideas from the text. One of the activities involved free recall by writing down as many ideas as possible and the other involved creating a concept map, both of them in the absence of educational texts. Critically, we manipulated the order in which the activities were performed. Results: A mediation analysis with success during retrieval practice as the mediator revealed both a direct effect of retrieval sequence and an indirect effect. Creating a concept map first and then freely recalling by writing paragraphs significantly improved performance on a 2-week delayed learning test, as compared to performing the same activities in the inverse order, even when doing concept mapping first led to lower success rates during practice. Discussion: These results support the idea that concept learning from instructional texts can be modulated by the sequence of retrieval activities performed and point to the educational value of retrieval-based concept mapping as a first learning activity within a series across different learners and educational settings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/bf03193146 · Cited by 65,971
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100612453266 · Cited by 3,138
Test-Enhanced Learning: Taking Memory Tests Improves Long-Term Retention
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x · Cited by 2,867
Retrieval Practice Produces More Learning than Elaborative Studying with Concept Mapping
Karpicke, J. D., & Blunt, J. R. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1199327 · Cited by 1,019
Learning With Concept and Knowledge Maps: A Meta-Analysis
Nesbit, J. C., & Adesope, O. O. (2006) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543076003413 · Cited by 932
Rethinking the Use of Tests: A Meta-Analysis of Practice Testing
Adesope, O. O., Trevisan, D. A., & Sundararajan, N. (2017) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654316689306 · Cited by 544
Testing (quizzing) boosts classroom learning: a systematic and meta-analytic review
Yang, C., Luo, L., Vadillo, M. A., Yu, R., & Shanks, D. R. (2021) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000309 · Cited by 333
Retrieval-Based Learning: A Decade of Progress
Karpicke, J. D. (2017) · Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-809324-5.21055-9 · Cited by 223
Agarwal, P. K., Nunes, L. D., & Blunt, J. R. (2021) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-021-09595-9 · Cited by 211
Learning with retrieval-based concept mapping.
Blunt, J. R., & Karpicke, J. D. (2014) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0035934 · Cited by 171
Research works printed but not linked: 45
- Álvarez, 1999, Cuestionario de Hábitos y Técnicas de Estudio (CHTE)
- Bae, 2019, Investigating the testing effect: retrieval as a characteristic of effective study strategies, Learn. Instr., 60, 206, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.12.008 · DOI
- Carpenter, 2009, Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: the benefits of elaborative retrieval, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn., 35, 1563, 10.1037/a0017021 · DOI · Paper page
- Carpenter, 2011, Semantic information activated during retrieval contributes to later retention: support for the mediator effectiveness hypothesis of the testing effect, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn., 37, 1547, 10.1037/a0024140 · DOI · Paper page
- Chevron, 2014, A metacognitive tool: theoretical and operational analysis of skills exercised in structured concept maps, Persp. Sci., 2, 46, 10.1016/j.pisc.2014.07.001 · DOI
- Craik, 1975, Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory, J. Exp. Psychol. Gen., 104, 268, 10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.268 · DOI · Paper page
- Fiorella, 2023, Making sense of generative learning, Educ. Psychol. Rev., 35, 50, 10.1007/s10648-023-09769-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Fiorella, 2016, Eight ways to promote generative learning, Educ. Psychol. Rev., 28, 717, 10.1007/s10648-015-9348-9 · DOI · Paper page
- Fritz, 2007, Comparing and combining retrieval practice and the keyword mnemonic for foreign vocabulary learning, Appl. Cognit. Psych., 21, 499, 10.1002/acp.1287 · DOI
- Gallenstein, 2013, Concept mapping for learners of all ages, J. Educ. Teach. Train., 4, 59
- Habók, 2012, Evaluating a concept mapping training programme by 10- and 13-year-old students, Int. Electr. J. Element. Ed., 4, 459
- Hinze, 2013, The importance of constructive comprehension processes in learning from tests, J. Mem. Lang., 69, 151, 10.1016/j.jml.2013.03.002 · DOI
- Hunt, 2012, Distinctive processing: the co-action of similarity and difference in memory, Psychol. Learn. Mot., 56, 1, 10.1016/B978-0-12-394393-4.00001-7 · DOI
- Kahana, 2017, Memory search, in learning and memory: a comprehensive reference, 181, 10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.21038-9 · DOI
- Karpicke, 2018, Concept mapping, 351
- Karpicke, 2012, Separate mnemonic effects of retrieval practice and elaborative encoding, J. Mem. Lang., 67, 17, 10.1016/j.jml.2012.02.004 · DOI
- Kinchin, 2014, Concept mapping as a learning tool in higher education: a critical analysis of recent reviews, J. Cont. High. Ed., 62, 39, 10.1080/07377363.2014.872011 · DOI
- Lamotte, 2021, Can tests improve learning in real university classrooms?, J. Cogn. Psychol., 33, 974, 10.1080/20445911.2021.1956939 · DOI
- Lechuga, 2015, Further evidence that concept mapping is not better than repeated retrieval as a tool for learning from texts, Learn. Instr., 40, 61, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.08.002 · DOI
- Leggett, 2019, Retrieval practice can improve classroom review despite low practice test performance, Appl. Cognit. Psychol., 33, 759, 10.1002/acp.3517 · DOI
- McDaniel, 2023, Combining retrieval practice with elaborative encoding: complementary or redundant?, Educ. Psychol. Rev., 35, 75, 10.1007/s10648-023-09784-8 · DOI
- McDaniel, 1984, Putting the keyword method in context, J. Educ. Psychol., 76, 598, 10.1037/0022-0663.76.4.598 · DOI
- McInerney, 2012, Academic self-concept and learning strategies: direction of effect on student academic achievement, J. Adv. Acad., 23, 249, 10.1177/1932202X12451020 · DOI
- Mechie, 2021, How does episodic memory develop in adolescence?, Learn. Mem., 28, 204, 10.1101/lm.053264.120 · DOI
- Mintzes, 2011, Comment on retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping, Science, 334, 453, 10.1126/science.1203698 · DOI
- Miyatsu, 2018, Five popular study strategies: their optimal implementation and pitfalls, Perspect. Psychol. Sci., 13, 390, 10.1177/1745691617710510 · DOI
- Moreira, 2019, Retrieval practice in classroom settings: a review of applied research, Front. Educ., 4, 5, 10.3389/feduc.2019.00005 · DOI
- Novak, 2006, The origins of the concept mapping tool and the continuing evolution of the tool, Inform. Visual., 5, 175, 10.1057/palgrave.ivs.9500126 · DOI · Paper page
- Novak, 1984, Learning how to learn, 10.1017/CBO9781139173469 · DOI · Paper page
- Ordaz-Villegas, 2013, Development of an academic self-concept for adolescents (ASCA) scale, J. Beh. Health Soc. Iss., 5, 117, 10.5460/jbhsi.v5.2.42304 · doi:10.5460/jbhsi.v5.2.42304
- Ortega-Tudela, 2021, Testing the effectiveness of retrieval-based learning in naturalistic school settings, SAGE Open, 11, 215824402110615, 10.1177/21582440211061569 · DOI
- Ortega-Tudela, 2019, A specific benefit of retrieval-based concept mapping to enhance learning from texts, Instr. Sci., 47, 239, 10.1007/s11251-018-9476-y · DOI
- Quinn, 2003, Successive concept mapping: assessing understanding in college science classes, J. Coll. Sci. Teach., 33, 12
- Racsmány, 2020, Reversing the testing effect by feedback is a matter of performance criterion at practice, Mem. Cogn., 48, 1161, 10.3758/s13421-020-01041-5 · DOI
- Repetto, 2004, Comprender y aprender en el aula. Programa para la integración en el curriculum de las estrategias de comprensión lectora
- Rivers, 2021, Metacognition about practice testing: a review of learners’ beliefs, monitoring, and control of test-enhanced learning, Educ. Psychol. Rev., 33, 823, 10.1007/s10648-020-09578-2 · DOI
- Roelle, 2023, Happy together? On the relationship between research on retrieval practice and generative learning using the case of follow-up learning tasks, Educ. Psychol. Rev., 35, 102, 10.1007/s10648-023-09810-9 · DOI
- Roelle, 2022, Sequence matters! Retrieval practice before generative learning is more effective than the reverse order, Learn. Instr., 80, 101634, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101634 · DOI
- Roelle, 2019, Generative learning versus retrieval practice in learning from text: the cohesion and elaboration of the text matters, J. Educ. Psychol., 111, 1341, 10.1037/edu0000345 · DOI
- Roessger, 2018, Effects of teaching concept mapping using practice, feedback, and relational framing, Learn. Instr., 54, 11, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.01.011 · DOI
- Roessger, 2021, Multi-level factors affecting immediate and delayed concept recall in concept mapping with adult learners, Educ. Psychol., 41, 224, 10.1080/01443410.2020.1806211 · DOI
- Schroeder, 2018, Studying and constructing concept maps: a meta-analysis, Educ. Psychol. Rev., 30, 431, 10.1007/s10648-017-9403-9 · DOI · Paper page
- Shing, 2010, Episodic memory across the lifespan: the contributions of associative and strategic components, Neurosci. Biobehav. R., 34, 1080, 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.11.002 · DOI · Paper page
- Shing, 2008, Associative and strategic components of episodic memory: a life-span dissociation, J. Exp. Psychol. Gen., 137, 495, 10.1037/0096-3445.137.3.495 · DOI · Paper page
- Tullis, 2020, Self-reported use of retrieval practice varies across age and domain, Metacogn. Learn., 15, 129, 10.1007/s11409-020-09223-x · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Lechuga, M. T., Ortega-Tudela, J. M., & Gómez-Ariza, C. J.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Education
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2024-03-14
- Volume
- 9
- ISSN
- 2504-284X
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 13
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Retrieval-based concept mapping makes a difference as a retrieval practice activity: a study with high school students. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/feduc.2024.1287744
- The paper
- Lechuga, M. T., Ortega-Tudela, J. M., & Gómez-Ariza, C. J. (2024). Retrieval-based concept mapping makes a difference as a retrieval practice activity: a study with high school students. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1287744
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.