Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Retrieval-based concept mapping makes a difference as a retrieval practice activity: a study with high school students

Lechuga, María Teresa, Ortega-Tudela, Juana M., Gómez-Ariza, Carlos J.·2024·Frontiers in Education

Abstract

Introduction: While specific sequences of retrieval-based activities have been shown to have a powerful effect on learning, no previous study has examined this issue in children or adolescents. Here, we aimed to determine whether the benefit of concept mapping as an initial retrieval activity observed previously with college students in a lab setting may also be found in younger and less experienced students in a more naturalistic school setting. Methods: After a short training in concept mapping, participants (N = 60) read an educational text and then engaged in a sequence of two learning activities that required them to retrieve relevant ideas from the text. One of the activities involved free recall by writing down as many ideas as possible and the other involved creating a concept map, both of them in the absence of educational texts. Critically, we manipulated the order in which the activities were performed. Results: A mediation analysis with success during retrieval practice as the mediator revealed both a direct effect of retrieval sequence and an indirect effect. Creating a concept map first and then freely recalling by writing paragraphs significantly improved performance on a 2-week delayed learning test, as compared to performing the same activities in the inverse order, even when doing concept mapping first led to lower success rates during practice. Discussion: These results support the idea that concept learning from instructional texts can be modulated by the sequence of retrieval activities performed and point to the educational value of retrieval-based concept mapping as a first learning activity within a series across different learners and educational settings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/feduc.2024.1287744

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. Álvarez, 1999, Cuestionario de Hábitos y Técnicas de Estudio (CHTE)
  2. Bae, 2019, Investigating the testing effect: retrieval as a characteristic of effective study strategies, Learn. Instr., 60, 206, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.12.008 · DOI
  3. Carpenter, 2009, Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: the benefits of elaborative retrieval, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn., 35, 1563, 10.1037/a0017021 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Carpenter, 2011, Semantic information activated during retrieval contributes to later retention: support for the mediator effectiveness hypothesis of the testing effect, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn., 37, 1547, 10.1037/a0024140 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Chevron, 2014, A metacognitive tool: theoretical and operational analysis of skills exercised in structured concept maps, Persp. Sci., 2, 46, 10.1016/j.pisc.2014.07.001 · DOI
  6. Craik, 1975, Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory, J. Exp. Psychol. Gen., 104, 268, 10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.268 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Fiorella, 2023, Making sense of generative learning, Educ. Psychol. Rev., 35, 50, 10.1007/s10648-023-09769-7 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Fiorella, 2016, Eight ways to promote generative learning, Educ. Psychol. Rev., 28, 717, 10.1007/s10648-015-9348-9 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Fritz, 2007, Comparing and combining retrieval practice and the keyword mnemonic for foreign vocabulary learning, Appl. Cognit. Psych., 21, 499, 10.1002/acp.1287 · DOI
  10. Gallenstein, 2013, Concept mapping for learners of all ages, J. Educ. Teach. Train., 4, 59
  11. Habók, 2012, Evaluating a concept mapping training programme by 10- and 13-year-old students, Int. Electr. J. Element. Ed., 4, 459
  12. Hinze, 2013, The importance of constructive comprehension processes in learning from tests, J. Mem. Lang., 69, 151, 10.1016/j.jml.2013.03.002 · DOI
  13. Hunt, 2012, Distinctive processing: the co-action of similarity and difference in memory, Psychol. Learn. Mot., 56, 1, 10.1016/B978-0-12-394393-4.00001-7 · DOI
  14. Kahana, 2017, Memory search, in learning and memory: a comprehensive reference, 181, 10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.21038-9 · DOI
  15. Karpicke, 2018, Concept mapping, 351
  16. Karpicke, 2012, Separate mnemonic effects of retrieval practice and elaborative encoding, J. Mem. Lang., 67, 17, 10.1016/j.jml.2012.02.004 · DOI
  17. Kinchin, 2014, Concept mapping as a learning tool in higher education: a critical analysis of recent reviews, J. Cont. High. Ed., 62, 39, 10.1080/07377363.2014.872011 · DOI
  18. Lamotte, 2021, Can tests improve learning in real university classrooms?, J. Cogn. Psychol., 33, 974, 10.1080/20445911.2021.1956939 · DOI
  19. Lechuga, 2015, Further evidence that concept mapping is not better than repeated retrieval as a tool for learning from texts, Learn. Instr., 40, 61, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.08.002 · DOI
  20. Leggett, 2019, Retrieval practice can improve classroom review despite low practice test performance, Appl. Cognit. Psychol., 33, 759, 10.1002/acp.3517 · DOI
  21. McDaniel, 2023, Combining retrieval practice with elaborative encoding: complementary or redundant?, Educ. Psychol. Rev., 35, 75, 10.1007/s10648-023-09784-8 · DOI
  22. McDaniel, 1984, Putting the keyword method in context, J. Educ. Psychol., 76, 598, 10.1037/0022-0663.76.4.598 · DOI
  23. McInerney, 2012, Academic self-concept and learning strategies: direction of effect on student academic achievement, J. Adv. Acad., 23, 249, 10.1177/1932202X12451020 · DOI
  24. Mechie, 2021, How does episodic memory develop in adolescence?, Learn. Mem., 28, 204, 10.1101/lm.053264.120 · DOI
  25. Mintzes, 2011, Comment on retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping, Science, 334, 453, 10.1126/science.1203698 · DOI
  26. Miyatsu, 2018, Five popular study strategies: their optimal implementation and pitfalls, Perspect. Psychol. Sci., 13, 390, 10.1177/1745691617710510 · DOI
  27. Moreira, 2019, Retrieval practice in classroom settings: a review of applied research, Front. Educ., 4, 5, 10.3389/feduc.2019.00005 · DOI
  28. Novak, 2006, The origins of the concept mapping tool and the continuing evolution of the tool, Inform. Visual., 5, 175, 10.1057/palgrave.ivs.9500126 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Novak, 1984, Learning how to learn, 10.1017/CBO9781139173469 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Ordaz-Villegas, 2013, Development of an academic self-concept for adolescents (ASCA) scale, J. Beh. Health Soc. Iss., 5, 117, 10.5460/jbhsi.v5.2.42304 · doi:10.5460/jbhsi.v5.2.42304
  31. Ortega-Tudela, 2021, Testing the effectiveness of retrieval-based learning in naturalistic school settings, SAGE Open, 11, 215824402110615, 10.1177/21582440211061569 · DOI
  32. Ortega-Tudela, 2019, A specific benefit of retrieval-based concept mapping to enhance learning from texts, Instr. Sci., 47, 239, 10.1007/s11251-018-9476-y · DOI
  33. Quinn, 2003, Successive concept mapping: assessing understanding in college science classes, J. Coll. Sci. Teach., 33, 12
  34. Racsmány, 2020, Reversing the testing effect by feedback is a matter of performance criterion at practice, Mem. Cogn., 48, 1161, 10.3758/s13421-020-01041-5 · DOI
  35. Repetto, 2004, Comprender y aprender en el aula. Programa para la integración en el curriculum de las estrategias de comprensión lectora
  36. Rivers, 2021, Metacognition about practice testing: a review of learners’ beliefs, monitoring, and control of test-enhanced learning, Educ. Psychol. Rev., 33, 823, 10.1007/s10648-020-09578-2 · DOI
  37. Roelle, 2023, Happy together? On the relationship between research on retrieval practice and generative learning using the case of follow-up learning tasks, Educ. Psychol. Rev., 35, 102, 10.1007/s10648-023-09810-9 · DOI
  38. Roelle, 2022, Sequence matters! Retrieval practice before generative learning is more effective than the reverse order, Learn. Instr., 80, 101634, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101634 · DOI
  39. Roelle, 2019, Generative learning versus retrieval practice in learning from text: the cohesion and elaboration of the text matters, J. Educ. Psychol., 111, 1341, 10.1037/edu0000345 · DOI
  40. Roessger, 2018, Effects of teaching concept mapping using practice, feedback, and relational framing, Learn. Instr., 54, 11, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.01.011 · DOI
  41. Roessger, 2021, Multi-level factors affecting immediate and delayed concept recall in concept mapping with adult learners, Educ. Psychol., 41, 224, 10.1080/01443410.2020.1806211 · DOI
  42. Schroeder, 2018, Studying and constructing concept maps: a meta-analysis, Educ. Psychol. Rev., 30, 431, 10.1007/s10648-017-9403-9 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Shing, 2010, Episodic memory across the lifespan: the contributions of associative and strategic components, Neurosci. Biobehav. R., 34, 1080, 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.11.002 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Shing, 2008, Associative and strategic components of episodic memory: a life-span dissociation, J. Exp. Psychol. Gen., 137, 495, 10.1037/0096-3445.137.3.495 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Tullis, 2020, Self-reported use of retrieval practice varies across age and domain, Metacogn. Learn., 15, 129, 10.1007/s11409-020-09223-x · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Lechuga, M. T., Ortega-Tudela, J. M., & Gómez-Ariza, C. J.
Venue
Frontiers in Education
Published
2024-03-14
Volume
9
ISSN
2504-284X
Cited by
2
References
13

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Retrieval-based concept mapping makes a difference as a retrieval practice activity: a study with high school students. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/feduc.2024.1287744
The paper
Lechuga, M. T., Ortega-Tudela, J. M., & Gómez-Ariza, C. J. (2024). Retrieval-based concept mapping makes a difference as a retrieval practice activity: a study with high school students. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1287744

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.