Cited by 18Thyroid Disorders and TreatmentsAdrenal Hormones and DisordersThyroid and Parathyroid Surgery

l-Thyroxine in an Oral Liquid or Softgel Formulation Ensures More Normal Serum Levels of Free T4 in Patients with Central Hypothyroidism

Open access
Benvenga, Salvatore, Capodicasa, Giovanni, Perelli, Sarah·2017·Frontiers in Endocrinology

Abstract

Context: L-thyroxine therapy of central hypothyroidism (CH) is guided by measurements of serum free thyroxine (FT4), which should be above the midnormal range value (MNRV). In some countries, novel formulations of oral L-thyroxine (liquid or softgel) are available further to the classic tablets. The intestinal absorption of either novel formulation is greater than tablets in patients with primary hypothyroidism. Objective: To evaluate if new oral formulations of L-T4 could be considered optimal in patients with central hypothyroidism who do not reach the FT4 target using tablet L-thyroxine. [Q5 Rev1] Design: Our observation of six patients with isolated CH and serum FT4 below MNRV under stable adequate doses of tablet L-thyroxine (median 1.51 µg/Kg bw/day), prompted us to switch them to liquid (n= 4) or softgel (n=3) L-thyroxine at the same dose, and verify whether FT4 increased above MNRV. A seventh patient with FT4 above MNRV was enrolled because she wanted a “more modern formulation”. Post-switch FT4 was measured at least twice with the same kit as pre-switch FT4. Results: In the first six patients, post-switch FT4 averaged 13.0±1.6 pg/ml compared to 10.4±1.8 pre-switch FT4 (P= 0.00026), with 11/13 (85%) measurements above MNRV compared to 0/20. In the liquid or softgel L-thyroxine group, post-switch FT4 averaged 13.1±1.6 vs 10.6±0.9 pg/ml pre-switch (P=0.0004) or 12.9±2.1 vs 10.3±2.4 (P=0.048) respectively. [Q5 Rev1] In the seventh patient (switched to liquid L-thyroxine), averages were 18.3 vs 15.2 pg/ml, and proportions 4/4 vs 2/2. Conclusion: In CH patients oral liquid or softgel L-thyroxine administered at the same doses as tablet L-thyroxine ensures target serum FT4 levels above MNRV that tablet L-thyroxine may miss. In turn, this performance confirms suggests [Q5 Rev2] the more favorable pharmacokinetics profile of either novel formulation compared with the tablet formulation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fendo.2017.00321

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Approximately 20% of patients with primary hypothyroidism and approximately 20% or 40% of patients with central hypothyroidism are undertreated, with co-administration of interfering medications being one major cause.

    “≈20% of patients with PH (10–13) and ≈20% (14) or 40% (15) of patients with CH are undertreated, co-administration of interfering medications (IM) being one major cause.”

    From L-T4 therapy in the presence of pharmacological interferents (2020) · cites this paper as [14]

  • L-T4 formulations (liquid, softgel) are refractory or much more resistant to interacting medications than tablet L-T4.

    “the availability of L-T4 formulations (liquid, softgel) that are refractory or much more resistant to IM than tablet L-T4 (9, 14, 98, 100, 109–114).”

    From L-T4 therapy in the presence of pharmacological interferents (2020) · cites this paper as [14]

  • Orally administered liquid and soft-gel LT4 formulations are associated with higher serum FT4 levels and lower TSH levels than tablet formulations, even when the overall LT4 dose level is the same.

    “Other reports from both retrospective and prospective observational studies indicate that orally administered liquid and soft-gel formulations of LT4 are associated with higher serum FT4 levels and lower TSH levels than tablet formulations, even when the overall LT4 dose level is the same – perhaps due to the absence of gastric disintegration [ 38 – 44 ].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 19 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Benvenga, S., Capodicasa, G., & Perelli, S.
Affiliations
University of Messina (IT)
Corresponding author
Perelli, Sarah
Venue
Frontiers in Endocrinology
Published
2017-11-20
Volume
8
Pages
321-321
ISSN
1664-2392 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2770853539
Cited by
18
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Endocrinology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
Keywords
central hypothyroidism, levothyroxine, liquid formulation, free thyroxine, oral drug absorption, thyroid hormone replacement, dose adjustment, treatment response variability, quality of life, patient satisfaction, medication adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review