Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 360

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rationale and Plan for Vitamin D Food Fortification: A Review and Guidance Paper

Open access
Pilz, Stefan, März, Winfried, Cashman, Kevin D., Kiely, Mairead E., Whiting, Susan J., Holick, Michael F., Grant, William B., Pludowski, Pawel, Hiligsmann, Mickael, Trummer, Christian, Schwetz, Verena, Lerchbaum, Elisabeth, Pandis, Marlene, Tomaschitz, Andreas, Grübler, Martin R., Gaksch, Martin, Verheyen, Nicolas, Hollis, Bruce W., Rejnmark, Lars, Karras, Spyridon N., Hahn, Andreas, Bischoff-Ferrari, Heike A., Reichrath, Jörg, Jorde, Rolf, Elmadfa, Ibrahim, Vieth, Reinhold, Scragg, Robert, Calvo, Mona S., van Schoor, Natasja M., Bouillon, Roger, Lips, Paul, Itkonen, Suvi T., Martineau, Adrian R., Lamberg-Allardt, Christel, Zittermann, Armin·2018·Frontiers in Endocrinology

Abstract

Vitamin D deficiency can lead to musculoskeletal diseases such as rickets and osteomalacia, but vitamin D supplementation may also prevent extraskeletal diseases such as respiratory tract infections, asthma exacerbations, pregnancy complications and premature deaths. Vitamin D has a unique metabolism as it is mainly obtained through synthesis in the skin under the influence of sunlight (i.e., ultraviolet-B radiation) whereas intake by nutrition traditionally plays a relatively minor role. Dietary guidelines for vitamin D are based on a consensus that serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) concentrations are used to assess vitamin D status, with the recommended target concentrations ranging from ≥25 to ≥50 nmol/L (≥10-≥20 ng/mL), corresponding to a daily vitamin D intake of 10 to 20 μg (400-800 international units). Most populations fail to meet these recommended dietary vitamin D requirements. In Europe, 25(OH)D concentrations <30 nmol/L (12 ng/mL) and <50 nmol/L (20 ng/mL) are present in 13.0 and 40.4% of the general population, respectively. This substantial gap between officially recommended dietary reference intakes for vitamin D and the high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in the general population requires action from health authorities. Promotion of a healthier lifestyle with more outdoor activities and optimal nutrition are definitely warranted but will not erase vitamin D deficiency and must, in the case of sunlight exposure, be well balanced with regard to potential adverse effects such as skin cancer. Intake of vitamin D supplements is limited by relatively poor adherence (in particular in individuals with low-socioeconomic status) and potential for overdosing. Systematic vitamin D food fortification is, however, an effective approach to improve vitamin D status in the general population, and this has already been introduced by countries such as the US, Canada, India, and Finland. Recent advances in our knowledge on the safety of vitamin D treatment, the dose-response relationship of vitamin D intake and 25(OH)D levels, as well as data on the effectiveness of vitamin D fortification in countries such as Finland provide a solid basis to introduce and modify vitamin D food fortification in order to improve public health with this likewise cost-effective approach.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fendo.2018.00373

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Pilz, S., März, W., Cashman, K. D., Kiely, M. E., Whiting, S. J., Holick, M. F., Grant, W. B., Pludowski, P., Hiligsmann, M., Trummer, C., Schwetz, V., Lerchbaum, E., Pandis, M., Tomaschitz, A., Grübler, M. R., Gaksch, M., Verheyen, N., Hollis, B. W., Rejnmark, L., Karras, S. N., Hahn, A., Bischoff-Ferrari, H. A., Reichrath, J., Jorde, R., Elmadfa, I., Vieth, R., Scragg, R., Calvo, M. S., van Schoor, N. M., Bouillon, R., Lips, P., Itkonen, S. T., Martineau, A. R., Lamberg-Allardt, C., & Zittermann, A.
Venue
Frontiers in Endocrinology
Published
2018-07-17
Volume
9
Pages
373-373
ISSN
1664-2392 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2883053146
Cited by
360
References
8
FWCI
26.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.