Cited by 43Medication Adherence and ComplianceThyroid Disorders and TreatmentsPharmacy and Medical Practices

Adherence to levothyroxine treatment among patients with hypothyroidism: a northeastern Italian survey

Open access
Cappelli, Carlo, Castello, Roberto, Marini, Fiorella, Paoletta, Agostino, Marchetti, Massimo, Saullo, Maura, Cristiano, Alessandra, Pirola, Ilenia +3 more·2018·Frontiers in Endocrinology

Abstract

Background: A significant number of patients showed sub-optimal adherence to LT4 therapy, mainly due to the fact that they had to postpone their breakfast of at least 30 minutes. The aim of this observational cross-sectional study was to assess the therapeutic compliance of patients on LT4 treatment and secondly to verify the preference of a lifetime treatment in tablets or liquid formulation. Patients and Methods: To all the participant (ambulatory care patients had to be eighteen or older, affected by hypothyroidism on LT4 substitutive treatment both in tablet or liquid solution) was administered the eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8). The MMAS-8 questionnaire has been supplemented with other three items in order to specifically evaluate medication preference between tablet and liquid LT4 formulation for long life treating. Results: A total of 320 patients (272 female) with median age of 47.9±15.6 yrs (range 20-78) completed the MMAS-8 questionnaire. We showed a high adherence (87% of the subjects) to therapeutic compliance both for patients on tablets than those on liquid LT4 formulation, although significant difference are emerged. Patients assuming LT4 in tablet forgot more frequently medication(s) (p<0.001), felt hassled about sticking to their treatment plan (p<0.001) and had difficulty to remember to take all their medication(s) (p<0.001) than those on liquid LT4 treatment. Conclusions: We showed a high adherence to levothyroxine treatment both for tablets than for liquid formulation. The possibility to take LT4 treatment at breakfast represent the best convenience for the majority of patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fendo.2018.00699

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A database study conducted in the United States and a questionnaire study conducted in Italy showed that the low and medium adherence rates were 54.1% and 64.5%, respectively.

    “Similarly, a database study conducted in the United States and a questionnaire study conducted in Italy showed that the low and medium adherence rates were 54.1% and 64.5%, respectively (124, 125).”
  • Liquid LT4 might improve patient compliance compared with tablets.

    “Cappelli et al revealed that liquid LT4 might improve patient compliance compared with tablets (124).”
  • Patients taking solution adhered much better to LT4 treatment than patients taking tablet (P < .001).

    “As discussed under “Pseudomalabsorption,” patients taking solution adhered much better to LT4 treatment than patients taking tablet (P < .001) (124).”
  • The major factor contributing to the discrepancy in compliance is the coingestion of breakfast and liquid LT4.

    “The major factor contributing to the discrepancy is the coingestion of breakfast and liquid LT4.”
  • Taken together, the convenience of the liquid preparation improves patient compliance.

    “Taken together, these data show that the convenience of the liquid preparation improves patient compliance.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cappelli, C., Castello, R., Marini, F., Paoletta, A., Marchetti, M., Saullo, M., Cristiano, A., Pirola, I., Gandossi, E., Ferlin, A., & Castellano, M.
Affiliations
  • Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia (IT)
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona (IT)
  • Ospedale San Bassiano (IT)
Corresponding author
Cappelli, Carlo
Venue
Frontiers in Endocrinology
Published
2018-11-23
Volume
9
Pages
699-699
ISSN
1664-2392 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2900804332
Cited by
43
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3
FWCI
3.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Endocrinology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Brescia) (submittedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
Keywords
levothyroxine, hypothyroidism, medication adherence, Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, drug preference, breakfast timing, forgetfulness, treatment burden

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review