The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does the Circular Economy Grow the Pie? The Case of Rebound Effects From Smartphone Reuse
Open accessAbstract
The environmental benefits of the circular economy (CE) are often taken for granted. There are, however, reasons to believe that rebound effects may counteract such benefits by increasing overall consumption or ‘growing the pie’. In this study, we focus on two main rebound mechanisms: (1) imperfect substitution between ‘re-circulated’ (recycled, reused, etc.) and new products and (2) re-spending due to economic savings. We use the case study of smartphone reuse in the US to quantify, for the first time, rebound effects from reuse. Using a combination of life cycle assessment, sales statistics, consumer surveying, consumer demand modelling, and environmentally-extended input-output analysis, we quantify the magnitude of this rebound effect for life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions. We find a rebound effect of 29% on average, with a range of 27% to 46% for specific smartphone models. Moreover, when exploring how rebound might play out in other regions and under different consumer behaviour patterns, we find that rebound effects could be higher than 100% (backfire effect). In other words, we estimate that about one third, and potentially the entirety, of emission savings resulting from smartphone reuse could be lost due to the rebound effect. Our results thus suggest that there are grounds to challenge the premise that CE strategies, and reuse in particular, always reduce environmental burdens.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Recently, Makov and Vivanco [204] estimated that one third, and potentially the entirety, of emission savings resulting from smartphone reuse could be lost based in part on this imperfect substitution [204].”
From Material efficiency strategies to reducing greenhouse gas emissions associated with buildings, vehicles, and electronics—a review (2019) · cites this paper as [204]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Circular Economy–A new sustainability paradigm?
Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048 · Cited by 9,360
Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007 · Cited by 6,536
Deaton, A. (1980) · Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) · Cited by 4,172
Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy
Bocken, N. M. P., de Pauw, I., Bakker, C., & van der Grinten, B. (2016) · Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering · doi:10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124 · Cited by 4,002
Circular economy: The concept and its limitations
Korhonen, J., Honkasalo, A., & Seppälä, J. (2018) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.041 · Cited by 3,961
Miller, R. E., & Blair, P. D. (2009) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108676212 · Cited by 2,841
Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 °C
Meinshausen, M., Meinshausen, N., Hare, W., Raper, S. C. B., Frieler, K., Knutti, R., Frame, D. J., & Allen, M. R. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08017 · Cited by 2,775
Going green to be seen: status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation
Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., & Van den Bergh, B. (2010) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0017346 · Cited by 2,174
Zink, T., & Geyer, R. (2017) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12545 · Cited by 1,210
Stadler, K., Wood, R., Bulavskaya, T., Södersten, C., Simas, M., Schmidt, S., Usubiaga, A., Acosta‐Fernández, J., Kuenen, J., Bruckner, M., et al. (2018) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12715 · Cited by 1,024
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Jenkins, 2011, Energy Emergence: Rebound and Backfire as Emergent Phenomena.
- Stahel, 1994, The utilization-focused service economy: resource efficiency and product-life extension, 178
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hertwich, E. G., Ali, S., Ciacci, L., Fishman, T., Heeren, N., Masanet, E., Asghari, F. N., Olivetti, E., Pauliuk, S., Tu, Q., et al. (2019) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab0fe3 · Cited by 477
Harris, S. E., Martin, M. A., & Diener, D. L. (2020) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2020.09.018 · Cited by 455
The rebound effect of circular economy: Definitions, mechanisms and a research agenda
Castro, C. G., Trevisan, A. H., Pigosso, D. C. A., & Mascarenhas, J. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131136 · Cited by 282
“Makov and Font Vivanco (2018) stated that sometimes the RE could benefit low-income groups.”
BackgroundInfluentialInformation and Communication Technology Solutions for the Circular Economy
Demestichas, K. P., & Daskalakis, E. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12187272 · Cited by 275
“also highlight re-spending and imperfect substitution as two examples of the environmental rebound effect (ERE), caused by the smartphones’ reuse [107].”
BackgroundDemand, Services and Social Aspects of Mitigation
(IPCC), I. P. O. C. C. (2023) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009157926.007 · Cited by 244
Metadata
- Authors
- Makov, T., & Font Vivanco, D.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- ORCID
- Makov, Tamar
- Venue
- Frontiers in Energy Research
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2018-05-09
- Volume
- 6
- ISSN
- 2296-598X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2799409500
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 18.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Frontiers in Energy Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission (702869)
- Yale University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
- Keywords
- circular economy, rebound effect, product reuse, life cycle greenhouse gas emissions, imperfect substitution, consumer behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
