Determining factors in shaping the sustainable behavior of the generation Z consumer
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: Organizations currently emphasize green marketing strategies by implementing marketing practices, aiming to design, produce, promote and sell green products. Thus, both consumers and producers have turned their attention to the category of environmental friendly products, taking into account that the concept of green marketing is now being given greater importance. Responsible organizations have begun to adapt their strategies in production, promotion and interaction activities with consumers or potential consumers of organic products in the context we are going through, when environmental protection becomes an imperative. Analysis of the sustainable behavior of Generation Z is a determining factor from the perspective of the task that this generation will naturally take on, in terms of environmental responsibility. Methods: The research aims to determine the profile of the Generation Z consumer, in order to adapt the strategic actions of the government or organizations to direct and educate as objectively and efficiently as possible towards adopting the principles of ecological, sustainable and responsible consumption. Based on the data collected through a survey, we analyzed the sustainable behavior of Generation Z consumers studying at Romanian universities where there are specializations in this field. The research is quantitative, using structural equation modelling with partial least squares (PLSSEM) to test the hypotheses regarding the relationship between the determining factors and the sustainable behavior of Generation Z consumers. Results and Discussion: The results show that there is a positive relationship between both the sustainable behavior of Generation Z consumers and the satisfaction it conveys to them, as well as their environmental protection activities. However, there is no relationship between the sustainable behavior of Generation Z consumers and the green marketing practices of the organizations, environmental issues and their identification with the environmentally responsible consumer.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research on GPCP buying patterns for Generation Z is sparse and sporadic.
“The literature review reveals that research on GPCP buying patterns for Generation Z is sparse and sporadic (Dragolea et al., 2023).”
From Antecedents to Green Personal Care Product Purchase Intention Among Gen Z Consumers from India (2026) · cites this paper as Dragolea et al., 2023
The Introduction says that research on Generation Z’s purchasing and consumption of green products is insufficient and that detailed, validated analyses of its purchasing behavior are lacking. It does not establish that research specifically on GPCP buying patterns is sparse or sporadic. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredGeneration Z's consumption behavior is sustainable at present, along with greater emphasis on ecological concerns and healthy consumption.
“Also, it is established that Generation Z's consumption behavior is sustainable at present, along with greater emphasis on ecological concerns and healthy consumption (Dragolea et al., 2023).”
From Antecedents to Green Personal Care Product Purchase Intention Among Gen Z Consumers from India (2026) · cites this paper as Dragolea et al., 2023
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Reyes, M. E. S., Carmen, B. P. B., Luminarias, M. E. P., Mangulabnan, S. A. N. B., & Ogunbode, C. A. (2023) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-021-02099-3 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 106
- Adisa, I., Adeola, O., and Oparison, A. (2021). Harnessing the potentials of generation green for green marketing success in africa's emerging economies. Palgrave Stud. Mark. Emerg. Econ. 131, 131-149. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-73007-9_9 · DOI
- Ahmad, S. N. B., and Omar, A. (2018). Influence of perceived value and personal values on consumers repurchase intention of natural beauty product. Int. J. Sup. Chain. Mgt 7 (2), 116-125.
- Aizawa, H., Yoshida, H., and Sakai, S. (2008). Current results and future perspectives for Japanese recycling of home electrical appliances. Resour. Conservation Recycl. 52 (12), 1399-1410. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.07.013 · DOI
- Andronie, M., Gardan, D. A., Dumitru, I., Gardan, I. P., Andronie, I. E., and Uta, C. (2019). Integrating the principles of green marketing by using big data. Good Pract. 21 (50), 258. doi:10.24818/ea/2019/50/258 · DOI
- Arora, N., and Manchanda, P. (2022). Green perceived value and intention to purchase sustainable apparel among Gen Z: The moderated mediation of attitudes. J. Glob. Fash. Mark. 13 (2), 168-185. doi:10.1080/20932685.2021.2021435 · DOI
- Bailey, A. J., Wills, C. M., and Mitchem, J. (2022). Attitudes towards climate change and scientific stories. J. Environ. Stud. Sci. 12, 714-726. doi:10.1007/s13412-022-00770-0 · DOI
- Bakewell, C., and Mitchell, V. (2003). Generation Y female consumer decision- making styles. Int. J. Retail Distribution Manag. 31 (2), 95-106. doi:10.1108/ 09590550310461994 · DOI
- Barber, N., Taylor, D. C., and Dodd, T. (2009). The importance of wine bottle closures in retail purchase decisions of consumers. J. Hosp. Mark. Manag. 18 (6), 597-614. doi:10. 1080/19368620903025014 · DOI
- Bhatia, M., and Jain, A. (2014). Green marketing: A study of consumer perception and preferences in India. Electron. Green J. 1 (36). doi:10.5070/g313618392 · DOI
- Bhavana, A., and Thiruchanuru, S. (2018). Green marketing: Gap analysis in the decision making process of a green consumer. J. Bus. Manag. Soc. Sci. Res. (JBM&SSR) 7 (3), 2319.
- Bojkovska, K., Dojchinovski, T., Jankulovski, N., Joshevska, E., and Najdovski, B. (2017). Contemporary approaches for consumer segmentation according to the level of ecological responsibility: The case of republic of Macedonia. Food Environ. Saf. J. 15 (2), 155-164.
- Brosdahl, D. J. C., and Carpenter, J. M. (2011). Shopping orientations of us males: A generational cohort comparison. J. Retail. Consumer Serv. 18 (6), 548-554. doi:10.1016/j. jretconser.2011.07.005 · DOI
- Brough, A. R., Wilkie, J. E. B., Ma, J., Isaac, M. S., and Gal, D. (2016). Is eco-friendly unmanly? The green-feminine stereotype and its effect on sustainable consumption. J. Consumer Res. 43 (4), 567-582. doi:10.1093/jcr/ucw044 · DOI · Paper page
- Budac, A.-C. (2014). Strategic considerations on how brands should deal with generation Z. Rev. Econ. 66 (5), 6-14.
- Bulut, Z. A., Kökalan Çımrin, F., and Doğan, O. (2017). Gender, generation and sustainable consumption: Exploring the behaviour of consumers from Izmir, Turkey. Int. J. Consumer Stud. 41 (6), 597-604. doi:10.1111/ijcs.12371 · DOI
- Bumbac, R., Bobe, M., Procopie, R., Pamfilie, R., Giușcă, S., and Enache, C. (2020). How zoomers' eating habits should be considered in shaping the food system for 2030-a case study on the young generation from Romania. Sustainability 12 (18), 7390. doi:10.3390/ su12187390 · DOI
- Butnaru, G. I., Haller, A.-P., Dragolea, L.-L., Anichiti, A., and Tacu Hârșan, G.-D. (2021). Students' wellbeing during transition from onsite to online education: Are there risks arising from social isolation? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18 (18), 9665. doi:10. 3390/ijerph18189665 · DOI
- Calk, R., and Patrick, A. (2017). Millennials through the looking glass: Workplace motivating factors | the journal of business inquiry. J. Bus. Inq. 16 (2), 131-139.
- Campbell-Arvai, V., Arvai, J., and Kalof, L. (2012). Motivating sustainable food choices. Environ. Behav. 46 (4), 453-475. doi:10.1177/0013916512469099 · DOI
- Casalegno, C., Candelo, E., and Santoro, G. (2022). Exploring the antecedents of green and sustainable purchase behaviour: A comparison among different generations. Psychol. Mark. 39 (5), 1007-1021. doi:10.1002/mar.21637 · DOI
- Chandra, S. (2019). A conceptual understanding of Green marketing in the Indian context. Int. J. Commer. Manag. Res. 5 (3), 80-87.
- Chaturvedi, P., Kulshreshtha, K., and Tripathi, V. (2020). Investigating the determinants of behavioral intentions of generation Z for recycled clothing: An evidence from a developing economy. Young Consum. 21 (4), 403-417. doi:10.1108/yc-03-2020-1110 · DOI
- Chen, M.-H., Chen, B. H., and Chi, C. G. (2018). Socially responsible investment by generation Z: A cross-cultural study of Taiwanese and American investors. J. Hosp. Mark. Manag. 28 (3), 334-350. doi:10.1080/19368623.2019.1525690 · DOI
- Chen, T. B., and Chai, L. T. (2010). Attitude towards the environment and green products: Consumers' perspective. Manag. Sci. Eng. 4 (2), 27-39. doi:10.3968/j.mse. 1913035X20100402.002 · DOI
- Cherian, J., and Jacob, J. (2012). Green marketing: A study of consumers' attitude towards environment friendly products. Asian Soc. Sci. 8 (12), 117. doi:10.5539/ass. · DOI · Paper page
- v8n12p117 Choi, Y., Kroff, M. W., and Kim, J. (2021). Developing brand advocacy through brand activities on Facebook. J. Consumer Mark. 38 (3), 328-338. doi:10.1108/jcm-10-2019-3460 · DOI
- Cui, Y., Lissillour, R., Chebeň, J., Lančarič, D., and Duan, C. (2022). The position of financial prudence, social influence, and environmental satisfaction in the sustainable consumption behavioural model: Cross-market intergenerational investigation during the Covid-19 pandemic. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 29, 996-1020. doi:10.1002/csr. 2250 · DOI
- Dabija, D.-C., Bejan, B. M., and Pușcaș, C. (2020). A qualitative approach to the sustainable orientation of generation Z in retail: The case of Romania. J. Risk Financial Manag. 13 (7), 152. doi:10.3390/jrfm13070152 · DOI
- Dabija, D. C., Bejan, B. M., and Dinu, V. (2019). Transformations in business & economics. Int. J. Sch. Pap. 18. 47. Dąbrowski, L. S., Środa-Murawska, S., Smoliński, P., and Biegańska, J. (2022). Rural-urban divide: Generation Z and pro-environmental behaviour. Sustainability 14 (23), 16111. doi:10.3390/su142316111 · DOI
- Dangelico, R. M., and Vocalelli, D. (2017). Green marketing": An analysis of definitions, strategy steps, and tools through a systematic review of the literature. J. Clean. Prod. 165 (0959-6526), 1263-1279. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.184 · DOI
- Davies, A., Titterington, A. J., and Cochrane, C. (1995). Who buys organic food? Br. Food J. 97 (10), 17-23. doi:10.1108/00070709510104303 · DOI
- Deliana, Y., and Rum, I. A. (2019). How does perception on green environment across generations affect consumer behavior? A neural network process. Int. J. Consumer Stud. 43 (4), 358-367. doi:10.1111/ijcs.12515 · DOI
- Diamantopoulos, A., Schlegelmilch, B. B., Sinkovics, R. R., and Bohlen, G. M. (2003). Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation. J. Bus. Res. 56 (6), 465-480. doi:10.1016/s0148- 2963(01)00241-7 · DOI
- Djafarova, E., and Foots, S. (2022). Exploring ethical consumption of generation Z: Theory of planned behaviour. Young Consum. 23 (3), 413-431. doi:10.1108/yc-10-2021-1405 · DOI
- Dospinescu, O., Anastasiei, B., and Dospinescu, N. (2019). Key factors determining the expected benefit of customers when using bank cards: An analysis on millennials and generation Z in Romania. Symmetry 11 (12), 1449. doi:10.3390/sym11121449 · DOI
- Eastman, J. K., and Liu, J. (2012). The impact of generational cohorts on status consumption: An exploratory look at generational cohort and demographics on status consumption. J. Consumer Mark. 29 (2), 93-102. doi:10.1108/07363761211206348 · DOI
- Fornell, C., and Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18 (1), 39-50. doi:10.2307/ 3151312 · DOI · Paper page
- Gajda, J. (2020). Organization and management scientific quarterly. Organ. Manag. 4 (52), 1899. doi:10.29119/1899-6116.2020.52.1 · DOI
- Gelderman, C. J., Schijns, J., Lambrechts, W., and Vijgen, S. (2021). Green marketing as an environmental practice: The impact on green satisfaction and green loyalty in a business-to-business context. Bus. Strategy Environ. 30 (4), 2061-2076. doi:10.1002/bse. 2732 · DOI
- Gierszewska, G., and Seretny, M. (2019). Sustainable behavior -the need of change in consumer and business attitudes and behavior. Found. Manag. 11 (1), 197-208. doi:10. 2478/fman-2019-0017 · DOI
- Gómez-Román, C., Lima, M. L., Seoane, G., Alzate, M., Dono, M., and Sabucedo, J.-M. (2020). Testing common knowledge: Are northern Europeans and millennials more concerned about the environment? Sustainability 13 (1), 45. doi:10.3390/su13010045 · DOI
- Groening, C., Sarkis, J., and Zhu, Q. (2018). Green marketing consumer-level theory review: A compendium of applied theories and further research directions. J. Clean. Prod. 172 (1), 1848-1866. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.002 · DOI
- Guzel, T. (2020). Generation Z attitudes and preferences about eco-friendly furniture and furnishings. Online J. Art Des. 8 (4), 38-39.
- Hansmann, R., Bernasconi, P., Smieszek, T., Loukopoulos, P., and Scholz, R. W. (2006). Justifications and self-organization as determinants of recycling behavior: The case of used batteries. Resour. Conservation Recycl. 47 (2), 133-159. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2005.10.006 · DOI
- Herberger, R. A. (1975). The ecological product buying motive: A challenge for consumer education. J. Consumer Aff. 9 (2), 187-195. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6606.1975. · DOI
- tb00562.x · DOI
- Hicks, D. D., and Hicks, D. (2003). Lessons for the future. The missing dimension in education. 1st Edition168 London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203219331 · DOI
- Hidayat, Z., and Hidayat, D. (2021). "Environmental sense of gen Z in online communities: Exploring the roles of sharing knowledge and social movement on instagram," in Proceedings of the 2nd Borobudur International Symposium on Humanities and Social Sciences, Magelang, Central Java, Indonesia, 18 November 2020, Bratislava, Slovakia: EAI -European Alliance for Innovation. doi:10.4108/eai.18- 11-2020.2311741 · DOI
- Hojnik, J., Ruzzier, M., and Konečnik Ruzzier, M. (2019). Transition towards sustainability: Adoption of eco-products among consumers. Sustainability 11 (16), 4308. doi:10.3390/su11164308 · DOI
- Irianto, H. (2015). Consumers' attitude and intention towards organic food purchase: An extension of theory of planned behavior in gender perspective. Int. J. Manag. Econ. Soc. Sci. 4 (1), 17-31.
- Jaciow, M., and Wolny, R. (2021). New technologies in the ecological behavior of generation Z. Procedia Comput. Sci. 192, 4780-4789. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2021.09.256 · DOI
- Jürkenbeck, K., Spiller, A., and Schulze, M. (2021). Climate change awareness of the young generation and its impact on their diet. Clean. Responsible Consum. 3, 100041. doi:10.1016/j.clrc.2021.100041 · DOI
- Kamenidou, I. C., Mamalis, S. A., Pavlidis, S., and Bara, E.-Z. G. (2019). Segmenting the generation Z cohort university students based on sustainable food consumption behavior: A preliminary study. Sustainability 11 (3), 837. doi:10.3390/su11030837 · DOI
- Kılıç, B., Bekar, A., and Yozukmaz, N. (2021). "The new foodie generation: Gen Z," in Generation Z marketing and management in tourism and hospitality, Berlin, Germany: Springer, 223-247. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-70695-1_9 · DOI
- Kowalska, A., Ratajczyk, M., Manning, L., Bieniek, M., and Mącik, R. (2021). Young and green" a study of consumers' perceptions and reported purchasing behaviour towards organic food in Poland and the United Kingdom. Sustainability 13 (23), 13022. doi:10.3390/su132313022 · DOI
- Krasulja, N., Ilić, D., and Marković, B. M. (2020). Basic principles of circular economy with special focus on sustainable consumption "Y" and "Z" generation. Ecoforum 9 (2), 7.
- Kymäläinen, T., Seisto, A., and Malila, R. (2021). Generation Z food waste, diet and consumption habits: A Finnish social design study with future consumers. Sustainability 13 (4), 2124. doi:10.3390/su13042124 · DOI
- Liang, J., Li, J., and Lei, Q. (2022). Exploring the influence of environmental values on green consumption behavior of apparel: A chain multiple mediation model among Chinese generation Z. Sustainability 14 (19), 12850. doi:10.3390/su141912850 · DOI
- Líšková, Z. D., Cudlínová, E., Pártlová, P., and Petr, D. (2016). Importance of green marketing and its potential. Visegrad J. Bioeconomy Sustain. Dev. 5 (2), 61-64. doi:10. 1515/vjbsd-2016-0012 · DOI
- Lorincová, T., Ondrijová, I., and Kovaľová, J. (2019). "Personality traits and buying behavior from the viewpoint of selected socio-demographic characteristics -preliminary findings," in Third International Scientific Conference ITEMA Recent Advances in Information Technology, Tourism, Economics, Management and Agriculture, Bratislava, Slovakia, October 24, 2019, Belgrade: Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans, Belgrade. doi:10.31410/itema.s.p.2019. · DOI
- Malikova, I. (2021). Perception of global issues of environment and circular economy by generation Z. SHS Web Conf. 92, 05018. doi:10.1051/shsconf/20219205018 · DOI
- May, V. (1991). Tourism, environment and development. Tour. Manag. 12 (2), 112-118. doi:10.1016/0261-5177(91)90065-2 · DOI
- Meredith, G., and Schewe, C. (2003). Defining markets, defining moments: America's 7 generational cohorts, their shared experiences, and why businesses should care. J. Consumer Mark. 20 (2), 172-173. doi:10.1108/07363760310464622 · DOI
- Mohd Suki, N. (2013). Young consumer ecological behaviour. Manag. Environ. Qual. An Int. J. 24 (6), 726-737. doi:10.1108/meq-02-2013-0010 · DOI
- Mukonza, C., Hinson, R. E., Adeola, O., Adisa, I., Mogaji, E., and Kirgiz, A. C. (2021). "Green marketing: An introduction," in Green marketing in emerging markets. Palgrave studies of marketing in emerging economies. Editors C. Mukonza, R. E. Hinson, O. Adeola, I. Adisa, E. Mogaji, and A. C. Kirgiz (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan), 3-14. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-74065- 8_1 · DOI
- Nadanyiová, M., and Gajanová, L. (2018). Consumersʼ perception of green marketing as a source of competitive advantage in the hotel industry. Littera Scr. 1 (1), 102-115.
- Narula, S., and Sabharwal, D. (2016). The oritical study of green marketing in India: Its importance and need. J. Mass Commun. Journalism 06 (08). doi:10.4172/2165-7912.s2-007 · DOI
- Noor, M. N. M., Jumain, R. S. A., Yusof, A., Ahmat, M. A. H., and Kamaruzaman, I. F. (2017). Determinants of generation Z green purchase decision: A SEM-PLS approach. Int. J. Adv. Appl. Sci. 4 (11), 143-147. doi:10.21833/ijaas.2017.011.023 · DOI
- Parment, A. (2013). Generation Y vs. Baby Boomers: Shopping behavior, buyer involvement and implications for retailing. J. Retail. Consumer Serv. 20 (2), 189-199. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2012.12.001 · DOI
- Parzonko, A. J., Balińska, A., and Sieczko, A. (2021). Pro-environmental behaviors of generation Z in the context of the concept of Homo socio-oeconomicus. Energies 14 (6), 1597. doi:10.3390/en14061597 · DOI
- Pavan, M., and Payal, S. (2012). Green marketing: Challenges and opportunities for business. J. Mark. Commun. 8 (1), 35-41.
- Peattie, K., and Crane, A. (2005). Green marketing: Legend, myth, farce or prophesy? Qual. Mark. Res. An Int. J. 8 (4), 357-370. doi:10.1108/13522750510619733 · DOI · Paper page
- Pelikánová, R. M., and Hála, M. (2021). CSR unconscious consumption by generation Z in the COVID-19 era-responsible heretics not paying CSR bonus? J. Risk Financial Manag. 14 (8), 390. doi:10.3390/jrfm14080390 · DOI
- Polonsky, M. J. (1994). An introduction to green marketing. Electron. Green J. 1 (2), 31210177. doi:10.5070/g31210177 · DOI · Paper page
- Polonsky, M. J. (2011). Transformative green marketing: Impediments and opportunities. J. Bus. Res. 64 (12), 1311-1319. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.01.016 · DOI
- Priporas, C.-V., Stylos, N., and Fotiadis, A. K. (2017). Generation Z consumers' expectations of interactions in smart retailing: A future agenda. Comput. Hum. Behav. 77 (1), 374-381. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.058 · DOI · Paper page
- Puiu, S. (2016). Generation Z -a new type of consumers. Young Econ. J./Revista Tinerilor Econ. 13 (27), 67-78.
- Saha, M., and Darnton, G. (2005). Green companies or green con-panies: Are companies really green, or are they pretending to Be? Bus. Soc. Rev. 110 (2), 117-157. doi:10.1111/j. 0045-3609.2005.00007.x · DOI
- Sarkar, A. N. (2012). Green branding and eco-innovations for evolving a sustainable green marketing strategy. Asia-Pacific J. Manag. Res. Innovation 8 (1), 39-58. doi:10.1177/ · DOI
- 2319510x1200800106 · DOI
- Schwartz, S. E. O., Benoit, L., Clayton, S., Parnes, M. F., Swenson, L., and Lowe, S. R. (2022). Climate change anxiety and mental health: Environmental activism as buffer. Curr. Psychol. 1, 1-14. doi:10.1007/s12144-022-02735-6 · DOI · Paper page
- Shiel, C., Paço, A., and Alves, H. (2020). Generativity, sustainable development and green consumer behaviour. J. Clean. Prod. 245, 118865. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118865 · DOI
- Shrum, L. J., McCarty, J. A., and Lowrey, T. M. (1995). Buyer characteristics of the green consumer and their implications for advertising strategy. J. Advert. 24 (2), 71-82. doi:10. 1080/00913367.1995.10673477 · DOI
- Shwetha, G. Y. (2019). A descriptive study on attitude of generation Z towards green behaviour. Cape Comorin Res. 1 (1), 30-35.
- Smith, K. T., and Brower, T. R. (2012). Longitudinal study of green marketing strategies that influence Millennials. J. Strategic Mark. 20 (6), 535-551. doi:10.1080/0965254x.2012.711345 · DOI
- Song, Y., Qin, Z., and Qin, Z. (2020). Green marketing to gen Z consumers in China: Examining the mediating factors of an eco-label-informed purchase. SAGE Open 10 (4), 215824402096357-15. doi:10.1177/2158244020963573 · DOI
- Ștefănică, M., and Butnaru, G. I. (2019). Some good practices for reducing energy consumption in hotels: A comparative analysis. J. E. U. Res. Bus. 2019, 1-8. doi:10.5171/2019.985409 · DOI
- Ștefănică, M., Sandu, C. B., Butnaru, G. I., and Haller, A.-P. (2021). The nexus between tourism activities and environmental degradation: Romanian tourists' opinions. Sustainability 13 (16), 9210. doi:10.3390/su13169210 · DOI
- Ann. Econ. Sci. Ser. 21 (1), 546-553.
- Ștefănică, M., Vodă, A. I., Butnaru, R. C., Butnaru, G. I., and Chirita, M. G. (2020). Ecological purchases made by managers in hotel industry. An approach of the main determining factors. Amfiteatru Econ. J. 22 (53), 1-57. doi:10.24818/EA/2019/53/57 · DOI
- Straub, D., and Gefen, D. (2004). Validation guidelines for IS positivist research. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 13 (24), 380-427. doi:10.17705/1cais.01324 · DOI · Paper page
- Su, C.-H., Tsai, C.-H., Chen, M.-H., and Lv, W. Q. (2019). U.S. Sustainable food market generation Z consumer segments. Sustainability 11 (13), 3607. doi:10.3390/su11133607 · DOI
- Suchanek, M., and Szmelter-Jarosz, A. (2019). Environmental aspects of generation Y's sustainable mobility. Sustainability 11 (11), 3204. doi:10.3390/su11113204 · DOI
- Suki, N. M., and Suki, N. M. (2019). "Correlations between awareness of green marketing, corporate social responsibility, product image, corporate reputation, and consumer purchase intention.Corp. Soc. Responsib. 2019, 143-154. doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-6192-7. · DOI
- ch008 · DOI
- Tran, K., Nguyen, T., Tran, Y., Nguyen, A., Luu, K., and Nguyen, Y. (2022). Eco-friendly fashion among generation Z: Mixed-methods study on price value image, customer fulfillment, and pro- environmental behavior. PLOS ONE 17 (8), e0272789. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0272789 · DOI
- Tsakiridou, E., Boutsouki, C., Zotos, Y., and Mattas, K. (2008). Attitudes and behaviour towards organic products: An exploratory study. Int. J. Retail Distribution Manag. 36 (2), 158-175. doi:10.1108/09590550810853093 · DOI
- Võ, M. (2019). Engaging generation Z through corporate social responsibility. Available at: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Engaging-Generation-Z-through-Corporate- Social-V%C3%B5/b8755c39803230384413cabb925753ae9c0a49aa.
- Walters, P. (2021). "Are generation Z ethical consumers?," in Generation Z marketing and management in tourism and hospitality, Berlin, Germany: Springer, 303-325. doi:10. 1007/978-3-030-70695-1_12 · DOI
- Williams, K., and Page, R. (2011). Marketing to the generations. J. Behav. Stud. Bus. 3 (1), 37-53.
- Witek, L., and Kuźniar, W. (2020). Green purchase behavior: The effectiveness of sociodemographic variables for explaining green purchases in emerging market. Sustainability 13 (1), 209. doi:10.3390/su13010209 · DOI
- Xie, G.-X., Cavallero, A., Cheng, M., Kahle, L. R., and Gurel-Atay, E. (2015). Communicating sustainability for the green economy. in Reluctant for a reason? A persuasion knowledge perspective on green advertising, 1st Ed. London:Routledge.
- Yang, C., and Wu, C.-C. (2007). Gender and Internet consumers' decision-making. CyberPsychology Behav. 10 (1), 86-91. doi:10.1089/cpb.2006.9988 · DOI
- Yazdanifard, R., and Mercy, I. E. (2011). The impact of Green Marketing on Customer satisfaction and Envi-ronmental safety. Available at: https://www.semanticscholar.org/ paper/The-impact-of-Green-Marketing-on-Customer-and-Envi-Yazdanifard-Mercy/ cb3927334b3e89761d573caaf47cff55c22ec2d6.
- Young, A. M., and Hinesly, M. D. (2012). Identifying millennials' key influencers from early childhood: Insights into current consumer preferences. J. Consumer Mark. 29 (2), 146-155. doi:10.1108/07363761211206393 · DOI
- Zhao, Z., Gong, Y., Li, Y., Zhang, L., and Sun, Y. (2021). Gender-related beliefs, norms, and the link with green consumption. Front. Psychol. 12, 710239. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.710239 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Does Greenwashing Wash Away Gen Z's Green Purchase Intention?
Di Pillo, F., Palombi, G., & Strazzullo, S. (2025) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.70064 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Antecedents to Green Personal Care Product Purchase Intention Among Gen Z Consumers from India
Radhakrishnan, K., Krishnan, M. M., Parayitam, S., & Cristofaro, M. (2026) · Administrative Sciences · doi:10.3390/admsci16060278
“The literature review reveals that research on GPCP buying patterns for Generation Z is sparse and sporadic (Dragolea et al., 2023).”
- Authors
- Dragolea, L.-L., Butnaru, G. I., Kot, S., Zamfir, C. G., Nuţă, A.-C., Nuţă, F.-M., Cristea, D. S., & Ştefănică, M.
- Affiliations
- 1 Decembrie 1918 University (RO)
- Alexandru Ioan Cuza University (RO)
- Częstochowa University of Technology (PL)
- "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati (RO)
- Danubius International University (RO)
- Ştefan cel Mare University of Suceava (RO)
- Corresponding author
- Butnaru, Gina Ionela
- Nuţă, Florian-Marcel
- ORCID
- Venue
- Frontiers in Environmental Science
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2023-01-20
- Volume
- 11
- ISSN
- 2296-665X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4317521296
- Cited by
- 137
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 41 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 11
- FWCI
- 36.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Environmental Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Keywords
- Generation Z, sustainable consumption, green marketing, consumer behavior, environmental protection, customer satisfaction, green products, university students, environmental awareness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review