Cited by 15Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and PrognosisCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersFerroptosis and cancer prognosis

Molecular subtype identification and signature construction based on Golgi apparatus-related genes for better prediction prognosis and immunotherapy response in hepatocellular carcinoma

Open access
Sun, Liang, Liu, Zitao, Wu, Zhengyi, Ning, Ke, Hu, Junwen, Chen, Zhendong, Wu, Zhipeng, Yin, Xiangbao·2023·Frontiers in Immunology

Abstract

Introduction: The Golgi apparatus (GA) is the center of protein and lipid synthesis and modification in normal cells and is involved in regulating various cellular process as a signaling hub, the dysfunction of which can lead to the development of various pathological conditions, including tumors. Mutations in Golgi apparatus-related genes (GARGs) are prevalent in most tumors, and their mutations can make them pro-tumor metastatic. The aim of this study was to analyze the predictive role of GARGs in the prognosis and immunotherapeutic outcome of hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods: We used TCGA, GEO and ICGC databases to classify hepatocellular carcinoma samples into two molecular subtypes based on the expression of GARGs. Signature construction was then performed using GARGs, and signature genes were selected for expression validation and tumor phenotype experiments to determine the role of GARGs in the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Results: Using the TCGA, GEO and ICGC databases, two major subtypes of molecular heterogeneity among hepatocellular carcinoma tumors were identified based on the expression of GARGs, C1 as a high-risk subtype (low survival) and C2 as a low-risk subtype (high survival). The high-risk subtype had lower StromalScore, ImmuneScore, ESTIMATEScore and higher TumorPurity, indicating poorer treatment outcome for ICI. Meanwhile, we constructed a new risk assessment profile for hepatocellular carcinoma based on GARGs, and we found that the high-risk group had a worse prognosis, a higher risk of immune escape, and a higher TP53 mutation rate. Meanwhile, TME analysis showed higher tumor purity TumorPurity and lower ESTIMATEScore, ImmuneScore and StromalScore in the high-risk group. We also found that the high-risk group responded more strongly to a variety of anticancer drugs, which is useful for guiding clinical drug use. Meanwhile, the expression of BSG was experimentally found to be associated with poor prognosis of HCC. After interfering with the expression of BSG in HCC cells SMMC-7721, the proliferation and migration ability of HCC cells were significantly restricted. Discussion: The signature we constructed using GARGs can well predict the prognosis and immunotherapy effect of hepatocellular carcinoma, providing new ideas and strategies for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1113455

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bioinformatic analysis linked GDI1 to pathways such as KRAS and mTORC1 signaling.

    “Bioinformatic analysis linked GDI1 to pathways such as KRAS and mTORC1 signaling [19]”

    From Construction and validation of golgi apparatus-related genes as predictors of the immune microenvironment and prognosis in colorectal cancer (2026) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Results section on differential expression and prognosis reports enrichment for glycosphingolipid biosynthesis and sphingolipid metabolism, but does not link GDI1 to KRAS or mTORC1 signaling. Searches of our copy for GDI1, KRAS, and mTORC1 found no passage addressing the claimed link; the paper’s pathway-analysis methods alone do not establish it. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sun, L., Liu, Z., Wu, Z., Ning, K., Hu, J., Chen, Z., Wu, Z., & Yin, X.
Affiliations
  • Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University (CN)
  • First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University (CN)
Corresponding author
Yin, Xiangbao
Venue
Frontiers in Immunology
Published
2023-03-27
Volume
14
Pages
1113455-1113455
ISSN
1664-3224 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4360982620
Cited by
14
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Immunology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis
Keywords
hepatocellular carcinoma, molecular subtypes, prognostic signature, immunotherapy response, immune evasion, tumor microenvironment, immune checkpoint inhibitors, TP53 mutation, brewer's spent grain, drug response prediction, cell proliferation and migration
MeSH terms
Golgi Apparatus, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Humans, Immunotherapy, Liver Neoplasms, Prognosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review