Cited by 41Innovations in Medical EducationPatient Safety and Medication ErrorsSimulation-Based Education in Healthcare

Psychological safety in health professions education: insights and strategies from a global community of practice

Open access
Dong, Chaoyan, Altshuler, Lisa, Ban, Nobutaro, Wong, Lee Yuen, Mohammed, Fatima Elbasri Abuelgasim, Tang, Chao Tian, Kachur, Elizabeth·2025·Frontiers in Medicine

Abstract

Psychological safety is the belief that one will not be punished or humiliated for speaking up, sharing ideas, raising concerns, or making mistakes. There are various threats to psychological safety in health professions education (HPE). This commentary applies Clark’s model of psychological safety (Inclusion Safety, Learner Safety, Contributor Safety, Challenger Safety) to five different HPE settings (classroom instructions, clinical training, simulation-based training, online instructions, interprofessional education). Setting-specific threats and strategies for enhancing psychological safety are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fmed.2024.1508992

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psychologically safe environments improve learning outcomes and enhance student well-being.

    “Dong et al. [68] found that psychologically safe environments not only improve learning outcomes but also enhance student well-being, reinforcing the importance of inclusive and supportive formative assessment strategies in medical education.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [3]Dweck CS. Mindset: the new psychology of success. Ballantine Book, pp. 1–320. (2007). Available at: https://www.amazon.com/Mindset-Psychology-Carol-S-Dweck/dp/0345472322 (Accessed Dec 17, 2021).
  2. [22]Dong C Ban N Kachur E Wong LY. Preserving psychological safety to enhance Interprofessional team performance in healthcare. In: SingHealth Duke-NUS education conference, Singapore. (2022).
  3. [24]Kachur E Dong C Wong LY Kao SP. Psychological safety in Formative and Summative OSCEs. In: Ottawa Conference. (2020).

Authors
Dong, C., Altshuler, L., Ban, N., Wong, L. Y., Mohammed, F. E. A., Tang, C. T., & Kachur, E.
Affiliations
  • Sengkang General Hospital (SG)
  • New York University (US)
  • Aichi Medical University (JP)
  • Khoo Teck Puat Hospital (SG)
  • University of Khartoum (SD)
Corresponding author
Dong, Chaoyan
Venue
Frontiers in Medicine
Published
2025-01-24
Volume
11
Pages
1508992-1508992
ISSN
2296-858X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406809103
Cited by
41
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 9
FWCI
37.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Keywords
psychological safety, health professions education, student safety, speaking up, simulation-based training, clinical teaching, online instruction, interprofessional education, communities of practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review