Cited by 16Nursing education and managementHealthcare Education and Workforce IssuesInnovations in Medical Education

Storytelling as a transformative tool: how narrative-based teaching reshapes clinical education outcomes in vocational nursing internships

Open access
Xiao, Le, Peng, Deqing, Zhong, Jindan, Fang, Tanglin, Dai, Lei, Peng, Xuyun, Yu, Chengying, Huang, Feiyan·2025·Frontiers in Medicine

Abstract

Background: Traditional clinical apprenticeships in Chinese vocational nursing education often inadequately address professional identity development. This study evaluates the effectiveness of narrative pedagogy in enhancing professional identity and clinical competencies among vocational nursing interns. Objective: To evaluate the impact of narrative teaching interventions on two primary outcomes: professional identity development and clinical competency acquisition among vocational nursing interns. Methods: Using stratified cluster randomization, 82 clinical interns from a tertiary hospital were allocated to either: Observation group (n = 42) received biweekly narrative teaching sessions incorporating storytelling, role-playing, reflective writing, and clinical application cycles. Control group (n = 40) standard one-on-one apprenticeship training. Post-intervention evaluations utilized the Nurse Professional Identity Scale, the Nursing Intern Core Competency Scale, and a custom teaching evaluation form. Results: The observation group significantly outperformed the control group in professional identity and core competency dimensions (P < 0.001), with notable improvements in personal traits and clinical skills. They also excelled in learning interest, teamwork, and clinical thinking (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Narrative-based teaching enhances vocational nursing students’ professional identity, competencies, and internship quality, offering a valuable model for emotional and professional development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fmed.2025.1587526

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The long-term stability of teaching outcomes and the efficiency of translating knowledge comprehension into clinical decision-making capabilities remain critical challenges to be addressed in nursing ethics education.

    “These studies indicate that the long-term stability of teaching outcomes and the efficiency of translating knowledge comprehension into clinical decision-making capabilities remain critical challenges to be addressed [11–21].”

    From Exploring the integration of AI and national quality courses in China: a study on teaching practices in nursing smart education (2025) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Limitations section says the study assessed students only during their internship, so it could not determine whether teaching effects persisted long term. The Discussion addresses clinical thinking and decision-making, but the paper does not identify the efficiency of converting knowledge comprehension into clinical decisions as a remaining challenge in nursing ethics education. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [35]Seungbeom S. Analysis of research trends in Christian education: Papers published during COVID-19 (2020.3 - 2022.6). J Christian Educ Korea. (2022) 72: 97– 115. 10.17968/jcek.2022.72.005 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xiao, L., Peng, D., Zhong, J., Fang, T., Dai, L., Peng, X., Yu, C., & Huang, F.
Affiliations
Xuancheng Vocational and Technical College (CN)
Venue
Frontiers in Medicine
Published
2025-06-18
Volume
12
Pages
1587526-1587526
ISSN
2296-858X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4411394719
Cited by
12
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 2
FWCI
11.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Anhui Provincial Department of Education
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
narrative pedagogy, storytelling, vocational nursing education, nursing internship, professional identity formation, clinical competence, role play, reflective writing, clinical reasoning, teamwork, Chinese nursing students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review