The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Parasite-Microbiota Interactions With the Vertebrate Gut: Synthesis Through an Ecological Lens
Open accessAbstract
The vertebrate gut teems with a large, diverse, and dynamic bacterial community that has pervasive effects on gut physiology, metabolism, and immunity. Under natural conditions, these microbes share their habitat with a similarly dynamic community of eukaryotes (helminths, protozoa, and fungi), many of which are well-known parasites. Both parasites and the prokaryotic microbiota can dramatically alter the physical and immune landscape of the gut, creating ample opportunities for them to interact. Such interactions may critically alter infection outcomes and affect overall host health and disease. For instance, parasite infection can change how a host interacts with its bacterial flora, either driving or protecting against dysbiosis and inflammatory disease. Conversely, the microbiota can alter a parasite's colonization success, replication, and virulence, shifting it along the parasitism-mutualism spectrum. The mechanisms and consequences of these interactions are just starting to be elucidated in an emergent transdisciplinary area at the boundary of microbiology and parasitology. However, heterogeneity in experimental designs, host and parasite species, and a largely phenomenological and taxonomic approach to synthesizing the literature have meant that common themes across studies remain elusive. Here, we use an ecological perspective to review the literature on interactions between the prokaryotic microbiota and eukaryotic parasites in the vertebrate gut. Using knowledge about parasite biology and ecology, we discuss mechanisms by which they may interact with gut microbes, the consequences of such interactions for host health, and how understanding parasite-microbiota interactions may lead to novel approaches in disease control.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Martinon, F., Burns, K., & Tschopp, J. (2002) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00599-3 · Cited by 6,066
Diversity, stability and resilience of the human gut microbiota
Lozupone, C. A., Stombaugh, J. I., Gordon, J. I., Jansson, J. K., & Knight, R. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11550 · Cited by 5,533
Induction of Colonic Regulatory T Cells by Indigenous Clostridium Species
Atarashi, K., Tanoue, T., Shima, T., Imaoka, A., Kuwahara, T., Momose, Y., Cheng, G., Yamasaki, S., Saito, T., Ohba, Y., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1198469 · Cited by 3,752
Treg induction by a rationally selected mixture of Clostridia strains from the human microbiota
Atarashi, K., Tanoue, T., Oshima, K., Suda, W., Nagano, Y., Nishikawa, H., Fukuda, S., Saito, T., Narushima, S., Hase, K., et al. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12331 · Cited by 2,872
Round, J. L., & Mazmanian, S. K. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0909122107 · Cited by 2,233
Ivanov, I. I., Frutos, R. D. L., Manel, N., Yoshinaga, K., Rifkin, D. B., Sartor, R. B., Finlay, B. B., & Littman, D. R. (2008) · Cell Host & Microbe · doi:10.1016/j.chom.2008.09.009 · Cited by 1,770
Interactions between the microbiota and pathogenic bacteria in the gut
Bäumler, A. J., & Sperandio, V. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature18849 · Cited by 1,420
Persistent gut microbiota immaturity in malnourished Bangladeshi children
Subramanian, S., Huq, S., Yatsunenko, T., Haque, R., Mahfuz, M., Alam, M. A., Benezra, A., DeStefano, J., Meier, M. F., Muegge, B. D., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13421 · Cited by 1,270
Gut Microbiomes of Malawian Twin Pairs Discordant for Kwashiorkor
Smith, M. I., Yatsunenko, T., Manary, M. J., Trehan, I., Mkakosya, R., Cheng, J., Kau, A. L., Rich, S. S., Concannon, P., Mychaleckyj, J. C., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1229000 · Cited by 1,173
Normalizing the environment recapitulates adult human immune traits in laboratory mice
Beura, L. K., Hamilton, S. E., Bi, K., Schenkel, J. M., Odumade, O. A., Casey, K. A., Thompson, E. A., Fraser, K. A., Rosato, P. C., Filali-Mouhim, A., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature17655 · Cited by 1,072
Cited by
Cullin, N., Azevedo Antunes, C., Straussman, R., Stein-Thoeringer, C. K., & Elinav, E. (2021) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2021.08.006 · Cited by 578
A Comprehensive Review on the Role of the Gut Microbiome in Human Neurological Disorders
Sorboni, S. G., Moghaddam, H. S., Jafarzadeh-Esfehani, R., & Soleimanpour, S. (2022) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00338-20 · Cited by 522
Autism Spectrum Disorders and the Gut Microbiota
Fattorusso, A., Di Genova, L., Dell’Isola, G., Mencaroni, E., & Esposito, S. (2019) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu11030521 · Cited by 484
Legrand, T. P. R. A., Wynne, J. W., Weyrich, L. S., & Oxley, A. P. A. (2020) · Reviews in Aquaculture · doi:10.1111/raq.12375 · Cited by 265
Tamburini, F. B., Maghini, D., Oduaran, O. H., Brewster, R., Hulley, M. R., Sahibdeen, V., Norris, S. A., Tollman, S., Kahn, K., Wagner, R. G., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-27917-x · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Leung, J. M., Graham, A. L., & Knowles, S. C. L.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Microbiology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2018-05-14
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 843-843
- ISSN
- 1664-302X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2803574693
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 16.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Parasite-Microbiota Interactions With the Vertebrate Gut: Synthesis Through an Ecological Lens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00843
- The paper
- Leung, J. M., Graham, A. L., & Knowles, S. C. L. (2018). Parasite-Microbiota Interactions With the Vertebrate Gut: Synthesis Through an Ecological Lens. Frontiers in Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00843
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
