Cited by 88Gut microbiota and healthGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology

Short- and long-read metagenomics of urban and rural South African gut microbiomes reveal a transitional composition and undescribed taxa

Open access
Tamburini, Fiona B., Maghini, Dylan, Oduaran, Ovokeraye H., Brewster, Ryan, Hulley, Michaella R., Sahibdeen, Venesa, Norris, Shane A., Tollman, Stephen +62 more·2022·Nature Communications

Abstract

Human gut microbiome research focuses on populations living in high-income countries and to a lesser extent, non-urban agriculturalist and hunter-gatherer societies. The scarcity of research between these extremes limits our understanding of how the gut microbiota relates to health and disease in the majority of the world's population. Here, we evaluate gut microbiome composition in transitioning South African populations using short- and long-read sequencing. We analyze stool from adult females living in rural Bushbuckridge (n = 118) or urban Soweto (n = 51) and find that these microbiomes are taxonomically intermediate between those of individuals living in high-income countries and traditional communities. We demonstrate that reference collections are incomplete for characterizing microbiomes of individuals living outside high-income countries, yielding artificially low beta diversity measurements, and generate complete genomes of undescribed taxa, including Treponema, Lentisphaerae, and Succinatimonas. Our results suggest that the gut microbiome of South Africans does not conform to a simple "western-nonwestern" axis and contains undescribed microbial diversity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-021-27917-x

Cites

123 of 123 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies in adults described differential microbiota patterns in non-westernized populations, including Prevotella spp. as a marker for non-westernized microbiomes.

    “Previous studies in adults have described differential microbiota patterns in non-westernized populations, highlighting, for example, Prevotella spp. as a marker for non-westernized microbiomes.26,57”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tamburini, F. B., Maghini, D., Oduaran, O. H., Brewster, R., Hulley, M. R., Sahibdeen, V., Norris, S. A., Tollman, S., Kahn, K., Wagner, R. G., Wade, A. N., Wafawanaka, F., Gómez-Olivé, F. X., Twine, R., Lombard, Z., H3Africa AWI-Gen Collaborative Centre, Agongo, G., Alberts, M., Ali, S., Asiki, G., Baloyi, V., Boua, P. R., Brandenburg, J.-T., Ceballos, F. C., Chikowore, T., Choma, S., Choudhury, A., Crowther, N., Debpuur, C., Gondwe, M., Hazelhurst, S., Kahn, K., Khayeka-Wandabwa, C., Kisiangani, I., Kyobutungi, C., Lombard, Z., Mashaba, G., Mashinya, F., Mathema, T., Micklesfield, L., Mohamed, S., Mthembu, B., Mukomana, F., Nonterah, E., Norris, S. A., Oduaran, O., Oduro, A. R., Gómez-Olivé, F. X., Ramsay, M., Sankoh, O., Sengupta, D., Smyth, N., Soo, C., Soodyall, H., Sorgho, H., Swiel, Y., Tambo, E., Tindana, P., Tinto, H., Tluway, F., Tollman, S., Twine, R., Wade, A., Wagner, R., Wandera, H., Kabudula, C., Ohene-Kwofie, D., Wafawanaka, F., Hazelhurst, S., & Bhatt, A. S.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • National Health Laboratory Service (ZA)
  • University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
Corresponding author
Bhatt, Ami S.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2022-02-22
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
926-926
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4212782842
Cited by
88
References
123
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 7 · 2020: 1
FWCI
5.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (GRFP)
  • Stanford CEHG
  • Stanford Graduate Fellowship
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | Fogarty International Center
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01 AI148623)
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (P30 CA124435)
  • Stanford Center for Innovation in Global Health; Rosenkranz Prize
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
Keywords
human gut microbiome, rural-urban transition, South Africa, microbial diversity, beta diversity, undescribed taxa, Treponema, Lentisphaerae
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Adult, Female, Humans, Rural Population, South Africa, Metagenomics, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review