CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 185

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social robots in advanced dementia

Valentí Soler, Meritxell, Agüera-Ortiz, Luis, Olazarán Rodríguez, Javier, Mendoza Rebolledo, Carolina, Pérez Muñoz, Almudena, Rodríguez Pérez, Irene, Osa Ruiz, Emma, Barrios Sánchez, Ana, Herrero Cano, Vanesa, Carrasco Chillón, Laura, Felipe Ruiz, Silvia, López Alvarez, Jorge, León Salas, Beatriz, Cañas Plaza, José M., Martín Rico, Francisco, Abella Dago, Gonzalo, Martínez Martín, Pablo·2015·Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00133PMC PMC4558428
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00133

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In dementia care, robotic pets were associated with reduced agitation, increased comfort, improved interaction, and greater engagement, although effects on depression, anxiety, quality of life, and long-term well-being were inconsistent.

    “In dementia care, robotic pets were associated with reduced agitation, increased comfort, improved interaction, and greater engagement, although effects on depression, anxiety, quality of life, and long-term well-being were inconsistent [14,25,26,28,29,35,38,47].”

    From The Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence-Based Pet Therapy in Improving the Care of Patients: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as [26]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Agüera-Ortiz, 2015, A novel rating scale for the measurement of apathy in institutionalized persons with dementia: the APADEM-NH, Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry, 23, 149, 10.1016/j.jagp.2013.01.079 · DOI
  2. Bemelmans, 2012, Socially assistive robots in elderly care: a systematic review into effects and effectiveness, J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc, 13, 14, 10.1016/j.jamda.2010.10.002 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bernabei, 2013, Animal-assisted interventions for elderly patients affected by dementia or psychiatric disorders: a review, J. Psychiatr. Res, 47, 762, 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.12.014 · DOI
  4. Boada, 2005, Neuropsychiatric inventory-nursing home version (NPI-NH): Spanish validation, Neurol. Barc. Spain, 20, 665
  5. Brodaty, 2012, Nonpharmacological management of apathy in dementia: a systematic review, Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry, 20, 549, 10.1097/JGP.0b013e31822be242 · DOI
  6. Broekens, 2009, Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review, Gerontechnology, 8, 94, 10.4017/gt.2009.08.02.002.00 · DOI
  7. Buiza, 2011, Short evaluation of cognitive state in advanced stages of dementia: preliminary results of the Spanish validation of the severe mini-mental state examination, Rev. Esp. Geriatr. Gerontol, 46, 131, 10.1016/j.regg.2010.09.006 · DOI
  8. Chan, 2010, Promoting engagement in cognitively stimulating activities using an intelligent socially assistive robot, IEEE, 533, 10.1109/AIM.2010.5695806 · DOI
  9. Churchill, 1999, Using a therapy dog to alleviate the agitation and desocialization of people with Alzheimer's disease, J. Psychosoc. Nurs. Ment. Health Serv., 37, 16, 10.3928/0279-3695-19990401-12 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Downes, 2013, Animal-assisted Therapy for People with Serious Mental Illness (Protocol), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  11. Fairbairn, 2006, Dementia: Supporting People with Dementia and their Carers in Health and Social Care.
  12. Fasola, 2010, Robot motivator: increasing user enjoyment and performance on a physical/cognitive task, IEEE, 274, 10.1109/DEVLRN.2010.5578830 · DOI
  13. Filan, 2006, Animal-assisted therapy for dementia: a review of the literature, Int. Psychogeriatr., 18, 597, 10.1017/S1041610206003322 · DOI
  14. Folstein, 1975, “Mini-mental state.” A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician, J. Psychiatr. Res., 12, 189, 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Garre-Olmo, 2010, Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of a Spanish version of the Quality of Life in Late-Stage Dementia Scale, Qual. Life Res., 19, 445, 10.1007/s11136-010-9594-8 · DOI
  16. Harrell, 2000, The Severe Mini-Mental State Examination: a new neuropsychologic instrument for the bedside assessment of severely impaired patients with Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis. Assoc, Disord, 14, 168
  17. Kanamori, 2003, Pilot study on improvement of quality of life among elderly using a pet-type robot, 107
  18. Lobo, 1999, Revalidation and standardization of the cognition mini-exam (first Spanish version of the Mini-Mental Status Examination) in the general geriatric population, Med. Clin., 112, 767
  19. López, 2014, Apatía en la Demencia. De la Neurobiología a la Clínica., Informaciones Psiquiátricas, 15
  20. Martin, 2013, Robotherapy with dementia patients, Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst., 10, 1, 10.5772/54765 · DOI · Paper page
  21. McCabe, 2002, Resident dog in the Alzheimer's special care unit, West. J. Nurs. Res., 24, 684, 10.1177/019394502320555421 · DOI
  22. Nakajima, 2001, Animal-shaped toys as therapeutic tools for patients with severe dementia, 3796, 10.1109/IEMBS.2001.1019665 · DOI
  23. O'Neil, 2011, A Systematic Evidence Review of Non-pharmacological Interventions for Behavioral Symptoms of Dementia, VA Evidence-based Synthesis Program Reports
  24. Olazarán, 2012, Promoting research in advanced dementia: early clinical results of the Alzheimer Center Reina Sofía Foundation, J. Alzheimers Dis., 28, 211, 10.3233/JAD-2011-110875 · DOI
  25. Prince, 2013, Policy Brief for Heads of Government: The Global Impact of Dementia 2013–2050
  26. Reisberg, 1982, The Global Deterioration Scale for assessment of primary degenerative dementia, Am. J. Psychiatry, 139, 1136, 10.1176/ajp.139.9.1136 · DOI
  27. Richeson, 2003, Effects of animal-assisted therapy on agitated behaviors and social interactions of older adults with dementia. Am. J. Alzheimers Dis, Other Demen, 18, 353, 10.1177/153331750301800610 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Robert, 2002, The apathy inventory: assessment of apathy and awareness in Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and mild cognitive impairment, Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry, 17, 1099, 10.1002/gps.755 · DOI
  29. Shibata, 2012, Therapeutic seal robot as biofeedback medical device: qualitative and quantitative evaluations of robot therapy in dementia care, Proc. IEEE, 100, 2527, 10.1109/JPROC.2012.2200559 · DOI
  30. Shibata, 2014, Trends of robot therapy with neurological therapeutic seal robot, PARO, J. Robot. Mechatron, 26, 418, 10.20965/jrm.2014.p0418 · DOI
  31. Tapus, 2009, Improving the quality of life of people with dementia through the use of socially assistive robots, 81, 10.1109/AT-EQUAL.2009.26 · DOI
  32. Tapus, 2009, The role of physical embodiment of a therapist robot for individuals with cognitive impairments, 103, 10.1109/ROMAN.2009.5326211 · DOI
  33. Vilalta-Franch, 1999, The neuropsychiatric inventory. Psychometric properties of its adaptation into Spanish, Rev. Neurol., 29, 15
  34. Weiner, 2000, The quality of life in late-stage dementia (QUALID) scale, J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc, 1, 114
  35. Wetzels, 2010, Course of neuropsychiatric symptoms in residents with dementia in nursing homes over 2-year period, Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry, 18, 1054, 10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181f60fa1 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Valentí Soler, M., Agüera-Ortiz, L., Olazarán Rodríguez, J., Mendoza Rebolledo, C., Pérez Muñoz, A., Rodríguez Pérez, I., Osa Ruiz, E., Barrios Sánchez, A., Herrero Cano, V., Carrasco Chillón, L., Felipe Ruiz, S., López Alvarez, J., León Salas, B., Cañas Plaza, J. M., Martín Rico, F., Abella Dago, G., & Martínez Martín, P.
Venue
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Published
2015-09-03
Volume
7
ISSN
1663-4365
DOI
10.3389/fnagi.2015.00133
PMC
PMC4558428
Cited by
185
References
3

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review