The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Influence of Prior Knowledge on Memory: A Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This article covers the topic of how prior knowledge influences the encoding of new memory.”
From The Ergonomics of Learning: A Proposed Update to Bloom’s Taxonomy (2025) · cites this paper as Brod, G., Werkle-Bergner, M., & Shing, Y. L. (2013)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
REMEMBERING: A STUDY IN EXPERIMENTAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
Bartlett, F. C., & Burt, C. (1933) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1933.tb02913.x · Cited by 7,475
(2023) · doi:10.1126/science · Cited by 6,063
McClelland, J. L., McNaughton, B. L., & O'Reilly, R. C. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.3.419 · Cited by 5,256
Simple memory: a theory for archicortex
Marr, D. (1971) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1971.0078 · Cited by 2,771
Pattern separation in the hippocampus
Yassa, M. A., & Stark, C. E. L. (2011) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2011.06.006 · Cited by 1,544
Cortical midline structures and the self
Northoff, G., & Bermpohl, F. (2004) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.01.004 · Cited by 1,446
Immature Frontal Lobe Contributions to Cognitive Control in Children
Bunge, S. A., Dudukovic, N. M., Thomason, M. E., Vaidya, C. J., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00583-9 · Cited by 1,291 · cited 4×
“In the framework offered by Craik and Bialystok (2006), the decrease in the ability to access knowledge is subsumed under the term cognitive control, which is known to increase steeply from infancy to young adulthood, and to decline thereafter (Bunge et al., 2002; Diamond, 2002; Zelazo et al., 2004). The framework by…”
BackgroundInfluentialSchemas and Memory Consolidation.
Tse, D., Langston, R. F., Kakeyama, M., Bethus, I., Spooner, P. A., Wood, E. R., Witter, M. P., & Morris, R. G. M. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1135935 · Cited by 1,244
(2006) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195100273.001.0001 · Cited by 1,186 · cited 1×
“The entorhinal cortex, perirhinal cortex, as well as the parahippocampal cortex, which all surround the HC, also play a role in the functioning of memory as they are the primary sources of neocortical inputs to the HC (Squire, 1992; Andersen et al., 2007).”
BackgroundAlba, J. W., & Hasher, L. (1983) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.93.2.203 · Cited by 1,169
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Neurobiology of Schemas and Schema-Mediated Memory
Gilboa, A., & Marlatte, H. (2017) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2017.04.013 · Cited by 742
When generating a prediction boosts learning: The element of surprise
Brod, G., Hasselhorn, M., & Bunge, S. A. (2018) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.01.013 · Cited by 131
Self-citationLighting the wick in the candle of learning: generating a prediction stimulates curiosity
Brod, G., & Breitwieser, J. (2019) · npj Science of Learning · doi:10.1038/s41539-019-0056-y · Cited by 60
Self-citationPrior knowledge is essential for the beneficial effect of targeted memory reactivation during sleep
Groch, S., Schreiner, T., Rasch, B., Huber, R., & Wilhelm, I. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep39763 · Cited by 58
Demblon, J., Bahri, M. A., & D'Argembeau, A. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.062 · Cited by 43
Naïve to expert: Considering the role of previous knowledge in memory
Alonso, A., van der Meij, J., Tse, D., & Genzel, L. (2020) · Brain and Neuroscience Advances · doi:10.1177/2398212820948686 · Cited by 46
Moscovitch, M., & Gilboa, A. (2022) · Faculty Reviews · doi:10.12703/r/11-33 · Cited by 27
The Ergonomics of Learning: A Proposed Update to Bloom’s Taxonomy
Curtis, A., & Johansson, A. (2025) · Intersection: A Journal at the Intersection of Assessment and Learning · doi:10.61669/001c.142595
Metadata
- Authors
- Brod, G., Werkle-Bergner, M., & Shing, Y. L.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 7
- ISSN
- 1662-5153
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 16
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
