Cited by 1,291Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Immature Frontal Lobe Contributions to Cognitive Control in Children

Open access
Bunge, Silvia A., Dudukovic, Nicole M., Thomason, Moriah E., Vaidya, Chandan J., Gabrieli, John D.E.·2002·Neuron

Abstract

Event-related fMRI was employed to characterize differences in brain activation between children ages 8-12 and adults related to two forms of cognitive control: interference suppression and response inhibition. Children were more susceptible to interference and less able to inhibit inappropriate responses than were adults. Effective interference suppression in children was associated with prefrontal activation in the opposite hemisphere relative to adults. In contrast, effective response inhibition in children was associated with activation of posterior, but not prefrontal, regions activated by adults. Children failed to activate a region in right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex that was recruited for both types of cognitive control by adults. Thus, children exhibited immature prefrontal activation that varied according to the type of cognitive control required.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00583-9

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A wealth of behavioral evidence on reactive inhibitory control demonstrates that self-regulation improves from childhood to adulthood.

    “A wealth of behavioral evidence on reactive inhibitory control demonstrates that self-regulation improves from childhood to adulthood (Bezdjian et al., 2014, Bunge et al., 2002, Casey et al., 1997, Casey et al., 2002, Durston et al., 2002, Marsh et al., 2006, Paulsen et al., 2015, Rubia et al., 2006, Rubia et al., 2013, Smith et al., 2011a, Tamm et al., 2002, Velanova et al., 2009, Veroude et al.,”

    From The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation (2016) · cites this paper as Bunge et al., 2002

  • Several studies have demonstrated a direct relationship between age-related increases in lPFC engagement and successful cognitive control.

    “Furthermore, several studies have demonstrated a direct relationship between age-related increases in lPFC engagement and successful cognitive control (Adleman et al., 2002, Andrews-Hanna et al., 2011, Bunge et al., 2002, Casey et al., 1997, Durston et al., 2006, Rubia et al., 2006, Rubia et al., 2007, Rubia et al., 2013, Velanova et al., 2009).”

    From The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation (2016) · cites this paper as Bunge et al., 2002

  • These changes appear to show a shift in activation of prefrontal regions from diffuse to more focal recruitment over time and elevated recruitment of subcortical regions during adolescence.

    “These changes appear to show a shift in activation of prefrontal regions from diffuse to more focal recruitment over time (Brown et al. 2005; Bunge et al. 2002; Casey et al. 1997; Durston et al. 2006; Moses et al. 2002) and elevated recruitment of subcortical regions during adolescence (Casey et al. 2002; Durston et al. 2006; Luna et al. 2001).”

    From <i>The Adolescent Brain</i> (2008) · cites this paper as Bunge et al. 2002

  • Across adolescence, performance on response inhibition tasks improves with age-a pattern that appears to be explained by continuing maturation of the lPFC, with most studies finding either a linear increase in lPFC recruitment with age or significantly increased engagement of the lPFC from adolescence to adulthood.

    “Across adolescence, performance on response inhibition tasks improves with age—a pattern that appears to be explained by continuing maturation of the lPFC, with most studies finding either a linear increase in lPFC recruitment with age (Adleman et al., 2002, Bunge et al., 2002, Durston et al., 2006, Marsh et al., 2006, Paulsen et al., 2015, Spielberg et al., 2015, Tamm et al., 2002, Velanova et al”

    From The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation (2016) · cites this paper as Bunge et al., 2002

  • Behavioral response inhibition improves linearly from childhood through adulthood.

    “The literature on behavioral response inhibition consistently demonstrates that the ability to successfully inhibit a response improves linearly from childhood through adulthood [70–72]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bunge, S. A., Dudukovic, N. M., Thomason, M. E., Vaidya, C. J., & Gabrieli, J. D. E.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Georgetown University (US)
Corresponding author
Bunge, Silvia A.
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-01
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
301-311
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1993478293
Cited by
1,291
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 70 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 70 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 78 · 2013: 83 · 2012: 69
FWCI
17.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health
  • Donald E. and Delia B. Baxter Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
cognitive control, frontal lobe maturation, children, interference suppression, response inhibition, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, prefrontal cortex activation, hemispheric lateralization
MeSH terms
Adult, Aging, Brain, Child, Child Behavior, Cognition, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neural Inhibition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review