Cited by 47Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

Global tractography with embedded anatomical priors for quantitative connectivity analysis

Open access
Lemkaddem, Alia, Skiöldebrand, Didrik, Dal Palú, Alessandro, Thiran, Jean-Philippe, Daducci, Alessandro·2014·Frontiers in Neurology

Abstract

Tractography algorithms provide us with the ability to non-invasively reconstruct fiber pathways in the white matter (WM) by exploiting the directional information described with diffusion magnetic resonance. These methods could be divided into two major classes, local and global. Local methods reconstruct each fiber tract iteratively by considering only directional information at the voxel level and its neighborhood. Global methods, on the other hand, reconstruct all the fiber tracts of the whole brain simultaneously by solving a global energy minimization problem. The latter have shown improvements compared to previous techniques but these algorithms still suffer from an important shortcoming that is crucial in the context of brain connectivity analyses. As no anatomical priors are usually considered during the reconstruction process, the recovered fiber tracts are not guaranteed to connect cortical regions and, as a matter of fact, most of them stop prematurely in the WM; this violates important properties of neural connections, which are known to originate in the gray matter (GM) and develop in the WM. Hence, this shortcoming poses serious limitations for the use of these techniques for the assessment of the structural connectivity between brain regions and, de facto, it can potentially bias any subsequent analysis. Moreover, the estimated tracts are not quantitative, every fiber contributes with the same weight toward the predicted diffusion signal. In this work, we propose a novel approach for global tractography that is specifically designed for connectivity analysis applications which: (i) explicitly enforces anatomical priors of the tracts in the optimization and (ii) considers the effective contribution of each of them, i.e., volume, to the acquired diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) image. We evaluated our approach on both a realistic diffusion MRI phantom and in vivo data, and also compared its performance to existing tractography algorithms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fneur.2014.00232

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Anatomically constrained tractography and similar methods constrain streamline propagation and termination using knowledge of where neuronal fibers locate, preventing streamlines that cannot represent biological connectivity.

    “the Anatomically-Constrained Tractography (ACT) framework (Smith et al., 2012) and similar methods (Girard and Descoteaux, 2012; Lemkaddem et al., 2014; Yeh et al., 2017) ensure that both streamline propagation and termination are constrained based on knowledge of where neuronal fibers locate, e.g., connecting between gray matter areas via the white matter.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. [2]Mori S Crain BJ Chacko VP van Zijl PC. Three-dimensional tracking of axonal projections in the brain by magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol (1999) 45(2): 265– 9. 10.1002/1531-8249(199902)45:2<265::AID-ANA21>3.0.CO;2-3 9989633 · DOI
  2. [3]Basser PJ Pajevic S Pierpaoli C Duda J Aldroubi A. In vivo fiber tractography using DT-MRI data. Magn Reson Med (2000) 44(4): 625– 32. 10.1002/1522-2594(200010)44:4<625::AID-MRM17>3.0.CO;2-O 11025519 · DOI
  3. [4]Parker G Haroon H Wheeler-Kingshott C. A framework for a streamline-based probabilistic index of connectivity (PICo) using a structural interpretation of MRI diffusion measurements. J Magn Reson Imaging (2003) 18(2): 242– 54. 10.1002/jmri.10350 12884338 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [5]Behrens T Woolrich M Jenkinson M Johansen-Berg H Nunes R Clare S Characterization and propagation of uncertainty in diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Magn Reson Med (2003) 50(5): 1077– 88. 10.1002/mrm.10609 14587019 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [6]Jbabdi S Bellec P Toro R Daunizeau J Pelegrini-Issac M Benali H. Accurate anisotropic fast marching for diffusion-based geodesic tractography. Int J Biomed Imaging (2008) 2008: 320195. 10.1155/2008/320195 18299703 PMC2235929 · DOI
  6. [7]Parker G Wheeler-Kingshott C Barker G. Estimating distributed anatomical connectivity using fast marching methods and diffusion tensor imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging (2002) 21(5): 505– 12. 10.1109/TMI.2002.1009386 12071621 · DOI
  7. [8]Fillard P Poupon C Mangin J. A novel global tractography algorithm based on an adaptive spin glass model. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv (2009) 12: 927– 34. 10.1007/978-3-642-04268-3_114 20426077 · DOI
  8. [9]Reisert M Mader I Anastasopoulos C Weigel M Schnell S Kiselev V. Global fiber reconstruction becomes practical. Neuroimage (2011) 54(2): 955– 62. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.016 20854913 · DOI · Paper page
  9. [10]Kreher B Mader I Kiselev V. Gibbs tracking: a novel approach for the reconstruction of neuronal pathways. Magn Reson Med (2008) 60(4): 953– 63. 10.1002/mrm.21749 18816816 · DOI
  10. [11]Fillard P Descoteaux M Goh A Gouttard S Jeurissen B Malcolm J Quantitative evaluation of 10 tractography algorithms on a realistic diffusion MR phantom. Neuroimage (2011) 56(1): 220– 34. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.032 21256221 · DOI · Paper page
  11. [12]Smith RE Tournier J-D Calamante F Connelly A. Anatomically-constrained tractography: improved diffusion MRI streamlines tractography through effective use of anatomical information. Neuroimage (2012) 62(3): 1924– 38. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.005 22705374 · DOI · Paper page
  12. [13]Girard G Whittingstall K Deriche R Descoteaux M. Towards quantitative connectivity analysis: reducing tractography biases. Neuroimage (2014) 98: 266– 78. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.074 24816531 · DOI · Paper page
  13. [15]Poupon C Rieul B Kezele I Perrin M Poupon F Mangin J-F. New diffusion phantoms dedicated to the study and validation of high-angular-resolution diffusion imaging (HARDI) models. Magn Reson Med (2008) 60(6): 1276– 83. 10.1002/mrm.21789 19030160 · DOI
  14. [16]Hagmann P Kurant M Gigandet X Thiran P Wedeen VJ Meuli R Mapping human whole-brain structural networks with diffusion MRI. PLoS One (2007) 2: e597 10.1371/journal.pone.0000597 17611629 PMC1895920 · DOI · Paper page
  15. [17]Jbabdi S Johansen-Berg H. Tractography: where do we go from here? Brain Connect (2011) 1(3): 169– 83. 10.1089/brain.2011.0033 22433046 PMC3677805 · DOI · Paper page
  16. [19]Sherbondy AJ Dougherty RF Ananthanarayanan R Modha DS Wandell BA. Think global, act local; projectome estimation with BlueMatter. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv (2009) 12(Pt 1): 861– 8. 10.1007/978-3-642-04268-3_106 20426069 PMC3076280 · DOI
  17. [20]Sherbondy A Rowe M Alexander D). MicroTrack: an algorithm for concurrent projectome and microstructure estimation. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2010, Volume 6361 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin: Springer (2010). p. 183– 90. 20879230
  18. [22]Daducci A Dal Palú A Lemkaddem A Thiran J-P. COMMIT: convex optimization modeling for micro-structure informed tractography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging (2014) (99): 1. 10.1109/TMI.2014.2352414 25167548 · DOI · Paper page
  19. [23]Garyfallidis E Brett M Correia MM Williams GB Nimmo-Smith I. QuickBundles, a method for tractography simplification. Front Neurosci (2012) 6: 175. 10.3389/fnins.2012.00175 23248578 PMC3518823 · DOI
  20. [24]Catmull E Rom R A class of local interpolating splines. In: Barnhill RE Riesenfled RF, editors. Computer aided geometric design. New York, NY: Academic Press (1974). p. 317– 26.
  21. [25]Douglas DH Peucker TK Algorithms for the reduction of the number of points required to represent a digitized line or its caricature. Cartographica (1973) 10: 112– 22 10.3138/FM57-6770-U75U-7727 · DOI
  22. [26]Jbabdi S Woolrich MW Andersson JL Behrens TE. A Bayesian framework for global tractography. Neuroimage (2007) 37(1): 116– 29. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.039 17543543 · DOI
  23. [28]Kirkpatrick S Gelatt CD Vecchi MP Optimization by simulated annealing. Science (1983) 220: 671– 80 10.1126/science.220.4598.671 17813860 · DOI · Paper page
  24. [29]Daducci A Dal Palu A Lemkaddem A Thiran J-P A convex optimization framework for global tractography. 2013 IEEE 10th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) San Francisco (2013). p. 524– 7 10.1109/ISBI.2013.6556527 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lemkaddem, A., Skiöldebrand, D., Dal Palú, A., Thiran, J.-P., & Daducci, A.
Affiliations
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
Corresponding author
Lemkaddem, Alia
Venue
Frontiers in Neurology
Published
2014-11-17
Volume
5
Pages
232-232
ISSN
1664-2295 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2033088751
Cited by
47
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Neurology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (144529, 205321)
  • Centre d'Imagerie BioMédicale
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
anatomical priors, structural connectivity, white matter fiber reconstruction, diffusion MRI, energy minimization, cortical connectivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review