The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Movement Recognition Technology as a Method of Assessing Spontaneous General Movements in High Risk Infants
Open accessAbstract
Preterm birth is associated with increased risks of neurological and motor impairments such as cerebral palsy. The risks are highest in those born at the lowest gestations. Early identification of those most at risk is challenging meaning that a critical window of opportunity to improve outcomes through therapy-based interventions may be missed. Clinically, the assessment of spontaneous general movements is an important tool, which can be used for the prediction of movement impairments in high risk infants. Movement recognition aims to capture and analyze relevant limb movements through computerized approaches focusing on continuous, objective, and quantitative assessment. Different methods of recording and analyzing infant movements have recently been explored in high risk infants. These range from camera-based solutions to body-worn miniaturized movement sensors used to record continuous time-series data that represent the dynamics of limb movements. Various machine learning methods have been developed and applied to the analysis of the recorded movement data. This analysis has focused on the detection and classification of atypical spontaneous general movements. This article aims to identify recent translational studies using movement recognition technology as a method of assessing movement in high risk infants. The application of this technology within pediatric practice represents a growing area of inter-disciplinary collaboration, which may lead to a greater understanding of the development of the nervous system in infants at high risk of motor impairment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“As mentioned before, direct sensing schemes (e.g., inertial sensors, magnetic tracking devices) are not optimally suited for infants due to bulk, size, rigid construction, and/or wired connections (22).”
From Miniaturized wireless, skin-integrated sensor networks for quantifying full-body movement behaviors and vital signs in infants (2021) · cites this paper as [22]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adams, J., Dinesh, K., Xiong, M., Tarolli, C. G., Sharma, S., Sheth, N., Aranyosi, A. J., Zhu, W. Y., Goldenthal, S. B., Biglan, K., et al. (2017) · Digital Biomarkers · doi:10.1159/000479018 · Cited by 3,190
A review of wearable sensors and systems with application in rehabilitation
Patel, S., Park, H., Bonato, P., Chan, L., & Rodgers, M. (2012) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/1743-0003-9-21 · Cited by 2,396
Born too soon : the Global action report on preterm birth
Howson, C. P., Kinney, M., & Lawn, J. E. (2012) · Cited by 1,928
A Survey of Computer Vision-Based Human Motion Capture
Moeslund, T. B., & Granum, E. (2001) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1006/cviu.2000.0897 · Cited by 1,788
Gait Analysis Using Wearable Sensors
Tao, W., Liu, T., Zheng, R., & Feng, H. (2012) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s120202255 · Cited by 1,252
Sensor-Based Activity Recognition
Chen, L., Hoey, J., Nugent, C. D., Cook, D. J., & Yu, Z. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) · doi:10.1109/tsmcc.2012.2198883 · Cited by 1,074
Einspieler, C., & Prechtl, H. F. R. (2005) · Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews · doi:10.1002/mrdd.20051 · Cited by 793
Moore, T., Hennessy, E., Myles, J. P., Johnson, S. J., Draper, E. S., Costeloe, K., & Marlow, N. (2012) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.e7961 · Cited by 777
Prechtl, H. F. R. (1990) · Early Human Development · doi:10.1016/0378-3782(90)90011-7 · Cited by 620
Direct measurement of human movement by accelerometry
Godfrey, A., Conway, R., Meagher, D., & ÓLaighin, G. (2008) · Medical Engineering & Physics · doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.09.005 · Cited by 591
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Adde, 2009, Using computer-based video analysis in the study of fidgety movements, Early Hum Dev, 85, 541, 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2009.05.003 · DOI
- Rahmanpour, 2009, Features for Movement based Prediction of Cerebral Palsy [MSc Thesis]
- Yang, 1998, Feature Subset Selection Using a Genetic Algorithm. Feature Extraction, Construction and Selection. The Springer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science. 453, 117
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Einspieler, C., Bos, A. F., Libertus, M. E., & Marschik, P. B. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00406 · Cited by 202
Optimising sampling rates for accelerometer-based human activity recognition
Khan, A., Hammerla, N., Mellor, S., & Plötz, T. (2016) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2016.01.001 · Cited by 171
Self-citationVelde, A. T., Morgan, C., Novak, I., Tantsis, E. M., & Badawi, N. A. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm8101599 · Cited by 170
Silva, N., Zhang, D., Kulvičius, T., Gail, A., Barreiros, C., Lindstaedt, S., Kraft, M., Bölte, S., Poustka, L., Nielsen‐Saines, K., et al. (2021) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2021.103854 · Cited by 137
Einspieler, C., Marschik, P. B., Pansy, J., Scheuchenegger, A., Krieber, M., Yang, H., Borszewska-Kornacka, M. K., Rowinska, E., Soloveichick, M., & Bos, A. F. (2015) · Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology · doi:10.1111/dmcn.12923 · Cited by 130
Metadata
- Authors
- Marcroft, C., Khan, A., Embleton, N. D., Trenell, M., & Plötz, T.
- Affiliations
- Royal Victoria Infirmary (GB)
- Newcastle University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Marcroft, Claire
- Venue
- Frontiers in Neurology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2015-01-09
- Volume
- 5
- Pages
- 284-284
- ISSN
- 1664-2295 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4288331
- OpenAlex
- W2076572096
- Cited by
- 146
- References
- 73
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8
- FWCI
- 1.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Frontiers in Neurology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by)
- Funders
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (SRF-2011-04-017)
- Research Councils UK
- Medical Research Council (MR/K006312/1)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
- Keywords
- motion recognition, high-risk infants, preterm infants, cerebral palsy, motion sensors, machine learning, early risk detection, infant motor development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
