The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cortical Microcircuit Dynamics Mediating Binocular Rivalry: The Role of Adaptation in Inhibition
Open accessAbstract
Perceptual bistability arises when two conflicting interpretations of an ambiguous stimulus or images in binocular rivalry (BR) compete for perceptual dominance. From a computational point of view, competition models based on cross-inhibition and adaptation have shown that noise is a crucial force for rivalry, and operates in balance with adaptation. In particular, noise-driven transitions and adaptation-driven oscillations define two dynamical regimes and the system explains the observed alternations in perception when it operates near their boundary. In order to gain insights into the microcircuit dynamics mediating spontaneous perceptual alternations, we used a reduced recurrent attractor-based biophysically realistic spiking network, well known for working memory, attention, and decision making, where a spike-frequency adaptation mechanism is implemented to account for perceptual bistability. We thus derived a consistently reduced four-variable population rate model using mean-field techniques, and we tested it on BR data collected from human subjects. Our model accounts for experimental data parameters such as mean time dominance, coefficient of variation, and gamma distribution fit. In addition, we show that our model operates near the bifurcation that separates the noise-driven transitions regime from the adaptation-driven oscillations regime, and agrees with Levelt's second revised and fourth propositions. These results demonstrate for the first time that a consistent reduction of a biophysically realistic spiking network of leaky integrate-and-fire neurons with spike-frequency adaptation could account for BR. Moreover, we demonstrate that BR can be explained only through the dynamics of competing neuronal pools, without taking into account the adaptation of inhibitory interneurons. However, the adaptation of interneurons affects the optimal parametric space of the system by decreasing the overall adaptation necessary for the bifurcation to occur, and introduces oscillations in the spontaneous state.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the Theory of the Brownian Motion
Uhlenbeck, G. E., & Ornstein, L. S. (1930) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.36.823 · Cited by 4,482
Wheatstone, C. (1838) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London · doi:10.1098/rstl.1838.0019 · Cited by 1,320
Probabilistic decision making by slow reverberation in cortical circuits
Wang, X.-J. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)01092-9 · Cited by 1,242
Amit, D. (1997) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/7.3.237 · Cited by 1,059
A Recurrent Network Mechanism of Time Integration in Perceptual Decisions
Wong, K.-F., & Wang, X.-J. (2006) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3733-05.2006 · Cited by 1,029
Blake, R., & Logothetis, N. K. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn701 · Cited by 1,027
Self-citationMultistable phenomena: changing views in perception
Leopold, D. A., & Logothetis, N. K. (1999) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01332-7 · Cited by 962
Self-citationOn the theory of brownian motion
Mazur, P. (1959) · Physica · doi:10.1016/s0031-8914(59)91931-7 · Cited by 904
Levelt, W. J. M. (1968) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 809
A neural theory of binocular rivalry.
Blake, R. (1989) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.96.1.145 · Cited by 640
Cited by
Introduction to Research Topic – Binocular Rivalry: A Gateway to Studying Consciousness
Maier, A., Panagiotaropoulos, T. I., Tsuchiya, N., & Keliris, G. A. (2012) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00263 · Cited by 629
Self-citationSkype Me! Socially Contingent Interactions Help Toddlers Learn Language
Roseberry, S., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2014) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12166 · Cited by 498
The Border Between Seeing and Thinking
Block, N. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197622223.001.0001 · Cited by 367
Emotional Valence and the Free-Energy Principle
Joffily, M., & Coricelli, G. (2013) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003094 · Cited by 322
MacDorman, K. F., & Chattopadhyay, D. (2016) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.09.019 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Theodoni, P., Panagiotaropoulos, T. I., Kapoor, V., Logothetis, N. K., & Deco, G.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 5
- Pages
- 145-145
- ISSN
- 1662-5161 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2031396362
- Cited by
- 338
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 17.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cortical Microcircuit Dynamics Mediating Binocular Rivalry: The Role of Adaptation in Inhibition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00145
- The paper
- Theodoni, P., Panagiotaropoulos, T. I., Kapoor, V., Logothetis, N. K., & Deco, G. (2011). Cortical Microcircuit Dynamics Mediating Binocular Rivalry: The Role of Adaptation in Inhibition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00145
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.