The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Introduction to Research Topic – Binocular Rivalry: A Gateway to Studying Consciousness
Open accessAbstract
In 1593, Neapolitan polymath Giambattista della Porta publicly lamented that he was unable to improve his impressive productivity (he had published in areas as diverse as cryptography, hydraulics, pharmacology, optics, and classic fiction). Della Porta was trying to read two books simultaneously by placing both volumes side-by-side, and using each eye independently. To his great surprise, his setup allowed him to only read one book at a time. This discovery arguably marks the first written account of binocular rivalry (Wade, 2000) – a perceptual phenomenon that more than 400 years later still both serves to intrigue as well as to illuminate the limits of scientific knowledge. At first glance, binocular rivalry is an oddball. In every day vision, our eyes receive largely matching views of the world. The brain combines the two images into a cohesive scene, and concurrently, perception is stable. However, when showing two very different images (such as two different books) to each eye, the brain resolves the conflict by adopting a “diplomatic” strategy. Rather than mixing the views of the two eyes into an insensible visual percept, observers perceive a dynamically changing series of perceptual snapshots, with one eye’s view dominating for a few seconds before being replaced by its rival from the other eye. With prolonged viewing of a rivalrous stimulus, one inevitably experiences a sequence of subjective perceptual reversals, separated by random time intervals, and this process continues for as long as the sensory conflict is present.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neural Mechanisms of Selective Visual Attention
Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205 · Cited by 8,388
Continuous flash suppression reduces negative afterimages
Tsuchiya, N., & Koch, C. (2005) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1500 · Cited by 973
Self-citationActivity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys' percepts during binocular rivalry
Leopold, D. A., & Logothetis, N. K. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/379549a0 · Cited by 929
Cortical Microcircuit Dynamics Mediating Binocular Rivalry: The Role of Adaptation in Inhibition
Theodoni, P., Panagiotaropoulos, T. I., Kapoor, V., Logothetis, N. K., & Deco, G. (2011) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00145 · Cited by 338
Self-citationStein, T., Hebart, M. N., & Sterzer, P. (2011) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00167 · Cited by 222
Panagiotaropoulos, T. I., Deco, G., Kapoor, V., & Logothetis, N. K. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.04.013 · Cited by 198
Self-citationWade, N. J. (1998) · Cited by 185
Ambiguous Figures – What Happens in the Brain When Perception Changes But Not the Stimulus
Kornmeier, J., & Bach, M. (2012) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00051 · Cited by 169
Attentional Modulation of Binocular Rivalry
Paffen, C. L. E., & Alais, D. (2011) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00105 · Cited by 104
Understanding Attentional Modulation of Binocular Rivalry: A Framework Based on Biased Competition
Dieter, K. C., & Tadin, D. (2011) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00155 · Cited by 80
Cited by
Gu, J., Strauss, C., Bond, R., & Cavanagh, K. (2015) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2015.01.006 · Cited by 1,712
The brain’s default network: updated anatomy, physiology and evolving insights
Buckner, R. L., & DiNicola, L. M. (2019) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-019-0212-7 · Cited by 1,058
Diamond, A., & Ling, D. S. (2016) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2015.11.005 · Cited by 1,177
Fox, K. C. R., Nijeboer, S., Dixon, M. L., Floman, J. L., Ellamil, M., Rumak, S. P., Sedlmeier, P., & Christoff, K. (2014) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.03.016 · Cited by 804
What Learning Systems do Intelligent Agents Need? Complementary Learning Systems Theory Updated
Kumaran, D., Hassabis, D., & McClelland, J. L. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.05.004 · Cited by 759
Metadata
- Authors
- Maier, A., Panagiotaropoulos, T. I., Tsuchiya, N., & Keliris, G. A.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 6
- Pages
- 263-263
- ISSN
- 1662-5161 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2021511340
- Cited by
- 629
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 34.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Introduction to Research Topic – Binocular Rivalry: A Gateway to Studying Consciousness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00263
- The paper
- Maier, A., Panagiotaropoulos, T. I., Tsuchiya, N., & Keliris, G. A. (2012). Introduction to Research Topic – Binocular Rivalry: A Gateway to Studying Consciousness. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00263
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.