The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ambiguous Figures – What Happens in the Brain When Perception Changes But Not the Stimulus
Open accessAbstract
During observation of ambiguous figures our perception reverses spontaneously although the visual information stays unchanged. Research on this phenomenon so far suffered from the difficulty to determine the instant of the endogenous reversals with sufficient temporal precision. A novel experimental paradigm with discontinuous stimulus presentation improved on previous temporal estimates of the reversal event by a factor of three. It revealed that disambiguation of ambiguous visual information takes roughly 50 ms or two loops of recurrent neural activity. Further, the decision about the perceptual outcome has taken place at least 340 ms before the observer is able to indicate the consciously perceived reversal manually. We provide a short review about physiological studies on multistable perception with a focus on electrophysiological data. We further present a new perspective on multistable perception that can easily integrate previous apparently contradicting explanatory approaches. Finally we propose possible extensions toward other research fields where ambiguous figure perception may be useful as an investigative tool.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal
Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., Augath, M., Trinath, T., & Oeltermann, A. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35084005 · Cited by 6,551
Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing
Dehaene, S., & Changeux, J.-P. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.03.018 · Cited by 2,573
Evidence for an integrative role of P3b in linking reaction to perception
Verleger, R., Jaśkowski, P., & Wascher, E. (2005) · Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1027/0269-8803.19.3.165 · Cited by 569
Single units and conscious vision
The American Association for Research into Nervous and Mental Diseases, & Logothetis, N. K. (1998) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1998.0333 · Cited by 375
Local field potential reflects perceptual suppression in monkey visual cortex
Wilke, M., Logothetis, N. K., & Leopold, D. A. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0604673103 · Cited by 187
Cited by
Chater, N., & Loewenstein, G. (2023) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x22002023 · Cited by 710
Introduction to Research Topic – Binocular Rivalry: A Gateway to Studying Consciousness
Maier, A., Panagiotaropoulos, T. I., Tsuchiya, N., & Keliris, G. A. (2012) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00263 · Cited by 629
The No-Report Paradigm: A Revolution in Consciousness Research?
Duman, I., Ehmann, I. S., Gonsalves, A. R., Gültekin, Z., Van den Berckt, J., & van Leeuwen, C. (2022) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2022.861517 · Cited by 24
The unfathomable richness of seeing
Haun, A., & Tononi, G. (2024) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/jmg35 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Kornmeier, J., & Bach, M.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 6
- Pages
- 51-51
- ISSN
- 1662-5161 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2015471263
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 6.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ambiguous Figures – What Happens in the Brain When Perception Changes But Not the Stimulus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00051
- The paper
- Kornmeier, J., & Bach, M. (2012). Ambiguous Figures – What Happens in the Brain When Perception Changes But Not the Stimulus. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00051
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.