The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Vicarious Reinforcement in Rhesus Macaques (Macaca Mulatta)
Open accessAbstract
What happens to others profoundly influences our own behavior. Such other-regarding outcomes can drive observational learning, as well as motivate cooperation, charity, empathy, and even spite. Vicarious reinforcement may serve as one of the critical mechanisms mediating the influence of other-regarding outcomes on behavior and decision-making in groups. Here we show that rhesus macaques spontaneously derive vicarious reinforcement from observing rewards given to another monkey, and that this reinforcement can motivate them to subsequently deliver or withhold rewards from the other animal. We exploited Pavlovian and instrumental conditioning to associate rewards to self (M1) and/or rewards to another monkey (M2) with visual cues. M1s made more errors in the instrumental trials when cues predicted reward to M2 compared to when cues predicted reward to M1, but made even more errors when cues predicted reward to no one. In subsequent preference tests between pairs of conditioned cues, M1s preferred cues paired with reward to M2 over cues paired with reward to no one. By contrast, M1s preferred cues paired with reward to self over cues paired with reward to both monkeys simultaneously. Rates of attention to M2 strongly predicted the strength and valence of vicarious reinforcement. These patterns of behavior, which were absent in non-social control trials, are consistent with vicarious reinforcement based upon sensitivity to observed, or counterfactual, outcomes with respect to another individual. Vicarious reward may play a critical role in shaping cooperation and competition, as well as motivating observational learning and group coordination in rhesus macaques, much as it does in humans. We propose that vicarious reinforcement signals mediate these behaviors via homologous neural circuits involved in reinforcement learning and decision-making.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Critically, rhesus macaques display basic aspects of complex social behaviors that are typically considered ‘uniquely human’ (Frith and Frith, 2007; Saxe, 2006). These include social imitation (Ferrari et al., 2006; Subiaul, 2004), prosocial behaviors (Chang et al., 2011; Masserman et al., 1964), as well as understanding others’ perceptions (Flombaum and Santos, 2005; Santos et al., 2006).”
From Oxytocin and social cognition in rhesus macaques: Implications for understanding and treating human psychopathology (2014) · cites this paper as Chang et al., 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal
Ndiaye, M., Lespez, L., Tribolo, C., Rassé, M., Hadjas, I., Davidoux, S., Huysecom, É., & Douze, K. (2024) · Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) · doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000667478 · Cited by 24,214
Brainard, D. H. (1997) · Spatial Vision · doi:10.1163/156856897x00357 · Cited by 20,012 · cited 1×
“Stimuli were controlled by a computer running Matlab using PsychToolbox (Brainard, 1997; Pelli, 1997).”
MethodThe VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies
Pelli, D. G. (1997) · Spatial Vision · doi:10.1163/156856897x00366 · Cited by 11,110 · cited 2×
“Stimuli were controlled by a computer running Matlab using PsychToolbox (Brainard, 1997; Pelli, 1997).”
BackgroundMethodA neural substrate of prediction and reward
Schultz, W., Dayan, P., & Montague, P. R. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.275.5306.1593 · Cited by 9,388 · cited 2×
“Reinforcement learning provides a powerful mechanism for associating stimuli and actions with the direct experience of reward and punishment (Rescorla and Wagner, 1972; Schultz et al., 1997; Sutton and Barto, 1998).”
BackgroundInfluentialRescorla, R. A. (1972) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7,268
Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-Glow Giving
Andreoni, J. (1990) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2234133 · Cited by 5,825 · cited 2×
“The “warm glow” hypothesis (Andreoni, 1990) suggests that vicarious reward and punishment motivates individuals to prefer either Edited by: Daeyeol Lee, Yale University School of Medicine, USA Reviewed by: Mehrdad Jazayeri, University of Washington, USA James Rilling, Emory University,…”
BackgroundEmpathy: its ultimate and proximate bases
Preston, S. D., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2002) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x02000018 · Cited by 4,126 · cited 1×
“It has been documented that social interaction behaviors increase with familiarity in both humans and monkeys (Preston and de Waal, 2002).”
BackgroundFehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02043 · Cited by 3,475 · cited 4×
“Such observations endorse the idea that neural mechanisms supporting vicarious reinforcement are derived specializations of the human brain, which support complex social behavior including observational learning, cooperation, and even altruism (Fehr and Fischbacher, 2003).”
BackgroundInfluentialDoes the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later
Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2008) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.010 · Cited by 1,592 · cited 2×
“Others have argued that only those species most closely related to humans, namely chimpanzees and bonobos, possess the derived features of human biology and cognition, in particular “theory of mind” (Call and Tomasello, 2008), express other-regarding preferences, but again the evidence for such behavior in apes remain…”
BackgroundThe Functional Theory of Counterfactual Thinking
Epstude, K., & Roese, N. J. (2008) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868308316091 · Cited by 905 · cited 1×
“For example, fictive, or counterfactual, learning describes sensitivity to reward outcomes for options that were not chosen, were merely observed, or were even imagined (Byrne, 2002; Lohrenz et al., 2007; Epstude and Roese, 2008).”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Sutton R. S. Barto A. G. (1998). Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. London: MIT Press
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Toward a second-person neuroscience
Schilbach, L., Timmermans, B., Reddy, V., Costall, A., Bente, G., Schlicht, T., & Vogeley, K. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12000660 · Cited by 1,510
Neuronal Reward and Decision Signals: From Theories to Data
Schultz, W. (2015) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00023.2014 · Cited by 1,126
The neurobiology of rewards and values in social decision making
Ruff, C. C., & Fehr, E. (2014) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3776 · Cited by 716
Children discard a resource to avoid inequity.
Shaw, A., & Olson, K. R. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/a0025907 · Cited by 408
Neuronal reference frames for social decisions in primate frontal cortex
Chang, S. W. C., Gariépy, J.-F., & Platt, M. L. (2013) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3287 · Cited by 336
Metadata
- Authors
- Chang, S. W. C., Winecoff, A. A., & Platt, M. L.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Chang, Steve W. C.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 5
- Pages
- 27-27
- ISSN
- 1662-453X (ISSN-L)
- 1662-4548
- PMC
- PMC3080185
- OpenAlex
- W2088134342
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 13.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Frontiers in Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH086712, R01MH095894)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- vicarious reinforcement, rhesus monkeys, social learning, potential outcomes, observational learning, cooperation, attention to others, classical conditioning, operant conditioning, reward valuation, group decision making
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
