The DOI matches its Crossref record; 101 of the 101 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Motor Imagery during Action Observation: A Brief Review of Evidence, Theory and Future Research Opportunities
Open accessAbstract
Motor imagery (MI) and action observation (AO) have traditionally been viewed as two separate techniques, which can both be used alongside physical practice to enhance motor learning and rehabilitation. Their independent use has largely been shown to be effective, and there is clear evidence that the two processes can elicit similar activity in the motor system. Building on these well-established findings, research has now turned to investigate the effects of their combined use. In this article, we first review the available neurophysiological and behavioral evidence for the effects of combined action observation and motor imagery (AO+MI) on motor processes. We next describe a conceptual framework for their combined use, and then discuss several areas for future research into AO+MI processes. In this review, we advocate a more integrated approach to AO+MI techniques than has previously been adopted by movement scientists and practitioners alike. We hope that this early review of an emergent body of research, along with a related set of research questions, can inspire new work in this area. We are optimistic that future research will further confirm if, how, and when this combined approach to AO+MI can be more effective in motor learning and rehabilitation settings, relative to the more traditional application of MI or AO independently.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Systematic review and meta-analysis
(2019) · Providing Information for Health · doi:10.1201/9781315377315-19 · Cited by 2,659
Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition.
Jeannerod, M. (2001) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0832 · Cited by 2,563
A Bio‐Informational Theory of Emotional Imagery
Lang, P. J. (1979) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1979.tb01511.x · Cited by 1,750 · cited 2×
“According to bio-informational theory (Lang, 1977, 1979), imagery is made up of stimulus, response, and meaning propositions.”
MethodThe functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations
Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2805 · Cited by 1,680
Neural Mechanisms for Interacting with a World Full of Action Choices
Cisek, P., & Kalaska, J. F. (2010) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135409 · Cited by 1,543
ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain
Caspers, S., Zilles, K., Laird, A. R., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.112 · Cited by 1,386
Shepard, R. N. (1984) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.91.4.417 · Cited by 940
The neural network of motor imagery: An ALE meta-analysis
Hétu, S., Grégoire, M., Saimpont, A., Coll, M.-P., Eugène, F., Michon, P.-E., & Jackson, P. L. (2013) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.03.017 · Cited by 899
Imagery in therapy: an information processing analysis of fear
Lang, P. J. (1977) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(77)80157-3 · Cited by 792
Neuroimaging Studies of Mental Rotation: A Meta-analysis and Review
Zacks, J. M. (2008) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20.1.1 · Cited by 792
Metadata
- Authors
- Eaves, D. L., Riach, M., Holmes, P. S., & Wright, D. J.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2016-11-21
- Volume
- 10
- Pages
- 514-514
- ISSN
- 1662-453X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2547844846
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 101
- FWCI
- 36.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Motor Imagery during Action Observation: A Brief Review of Evidence, Theory and Future Research Opportunities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fnins.2016.00514
- The paper
- Eaves, D. L., Riach, M., Holmes, P. S., & Wright, D. J. (2016). Motor Imagery during Action Observation: A Brief Review of Evidence, Theory and Future Research Opportunities. Frontiers in Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00514
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.