Cited by 9Cell Image Analysis TechniquesMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques

A rapid workflow for neuron counting in combined light sheet microscopy and magnetic resonance histology

Open access
Tian, Yuqi, Johnson, G. Allan, Williams, Robert W., White, Leonard E.·2023·Frontiers in Neuroscience

Abstract

Information on regional variation in cell numbers and densities in the CNS provides critical insight into structure, function, and the progression of CNS diseases. However, variability can be real or a consequence of methods that do not account for technical biases, including morphologic deformations, errors in the application of cell type labels and boundaries of regions, errors of counting rules and sampling sites. We address these issues in a mouse model by introducing a workflow that consists of the following steps: 1. Magnetic resonance histology (MRH) to establish the size, shape, and regional morphology of the mouse brain in situ. 2. Light-sheet microscopy (LSM) to selectively label neurons or other cells in the entire brain without sectioning artifacts. 3. Register LSM volumes to MRH volumes to correct for dissection errors and both global and regional deformations. 4. Implement stereological protocols for automated sampling and counting of cells in 3D LSM volumes. This workflow can analyze the cell densities of one brain region in less than 1 min and is highly replicable in cortical and subcortical gray matter regions and structures throughout the brain. This method demonstrates the advantage of not requiring an extensive amount of training data, achieving a F1 score of approximately 0.9 with just 20 training nuclei. We report deformation-corrected neuron (NeuN) counts and neuronal density in 13 representative regions in 5 C57BL/6J cases and 2 BXD strains. The data represent the variability among specimens for the same brain region and across regions within the specimen. Neuronal densities estimated with our workflow are within the range of values in previous classical stereological studies. We demonstrate the application of our workflow to a mouse model of aging. This workflow improves the accuracy of neuron counting and the assessment of neuronal density on a region-by-region basis, with broad applications for studies of how genetics, environment, and development across the lifespan impact cell numbers in the CNS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnins.2023.1223226

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Densities of aβ plaques and NeuN+ cells can be estimated in anatomically corrected stereotaxic space using a digital version of direct 3-dimensional counting (optical disector).

    “We can estimate densities of aβ plaques and NeuN+ cells in anatomically corrected stereotaxic space using a digital version of direct 3-dimensional counting, now often referred to as the optical disector23,99.”

    From Magnetic resonance microscopy maps widespread effects of Alzheimer’s disease on brain structures and behavior in mice (2026) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Abstract (page not specified) describes deformation-corrected NeuN densities and automated sampling and counting in 3D volumes; the Discussion says densities are calculated in morphology-corrected space. The paper does not report aβ-plaque densities or identify its digital workflow as an optical disector, so those parts of the attributed claim are unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The numerical analyses are relatively robust, and in both cases and controls the counts align reasonably well with well validated estimates of neuron numbers.

    “Nonetheless, the numerical analyses are relatively robust, and in both cases and controls our counts align reasonably well with well validated estimates of neuron numbers23.”

    From Magnetic resonance microscopy maps widespread effects of Alzheimer’s disease on brain structures and behavior in mice (2026) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Abstract (page unavailable) says the paper’s mouse neuronal-density estimates fall within the range of previous stereological studies. The Discussion (page unavailable) says most cortical-region densities were consistent with earlier reports, but identifies several regions with higher estimates. The paper does not establish that the citing authors’ counts align with validated neuron-number estimates in both cases and controls; its comparison is primarily of density in mice. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tian, Y., Johnson, G. A., Williams, R. W., & White, L. E.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
Corresponding author
White, Leonard E.
Venue
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Published
2023-09-27
Volume
17
Pages
1223226-1223226
ISSN
1662-453X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387139390
Cited by
9
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
Keywords
neuron counting, neuronal density, light-sheet microscopy, stereology, brain registration, deformation correction, NeuN, mouse brain, aging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review