CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Editorial: synaptic plasticity and dysfunction, friend or foe?

Open access
Nugent, Fereshteh S., Li, Ka Wan, Chen, Lu·2023·Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience
DOI 10.3389/fnsyn.2023.1204605PMC PMC10189113
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnsyn.2023.1204605

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neuroplasticity is a fundamental property of the CNS that enables neural circuits to adapt to activity and experience by modifying synaptic strength, connectivity, and structural organization.

    “Neuroplasticity is a fundamental property of the CNS that enables neural circuits to adapt to activity and experience by modifying synaptic strength, connectivity, and, in some contexts, structural organization (Nugent et al., 2023; Weiss, 2007; Zsarnovszky et al., 2024).”

    From Environmental endocrine disruptors at the synapse: mechanisms linking chemical exposure to cognitive and behavioral dysfunction (2026) · cites this paper as Nugent et al., 2023

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Bavelier D. Neville H. J. (2002). Cross-modal plasticity: where and how? Nature Rev. Nurosci. 3, 443– 52. 10.1038/nrn848 12042879 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Buzsaki G. (1988). Polysynaptic long-term potentiation: a physiological role of the perforant path-CA3/CA1 pyramidal cell synapse. Brain Res. 455, 192– 5. 10.1016/0006-8993(88)90133-3 3416187 · DOI
  3. Ewall G. Parkins S. Lin A. Jaoui Y. Lee H. K. (2021). Cortical and subcortical circuits for cross-modal plasticity induced by loss of vision. Front. Neural. Circuits. 15, 665009. 10.3389/fncir.2021.665009 34113240 PMC8185208 · DOI
  4. Feng W. Zhang M. (2009). Organization and dynamics of PDZ-domain-related supramodules in the postsynaptic density. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 87– 99. 10.1038/nrn254 19153575 · DOI
  5. Herring B. E. Nicoll R. A. (2016). Long-term potentiation: from CaMKII to AMPA receptor trafficking. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 78, 351– 65. 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021014-071753 26863325 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Huber K. M. Gallagher S. M. Warren S. T. Bear M. F. (2002). Altered synaptic plasticity in a mouse model of fragile X mental retardation. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 99, 7746– 50. 10.1073/pnas.122205699 12032354 PMC124340 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Klemmer P. Meredith R. M. Holmgren C. D. Klychnikov O. I. Stahl-Zeng J. Loos M.. (2011). Proteomics, ultrastructure, and physiology of hippocampal synapses in a fragile X syndrome mouse model reveal presynaptic phenotype. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 25495– 504. 10.1074/jbc.M110.210260 21596744 PMC3138307 · DOI
  8. Krug M. Brödemann R. Matthies R. Rüthrich H. Wagner M. (2001). Activation of the dentate gyrus by stimulation of the contralateral perforant pathway: evoked potentials and long-term potentiation after ipsi-and contralateral induction. Hippocampus. 11, 157– 67. 10.1002/hipo.1033 11345122 · DOI
  9. Li J. Park E. Zhong L. R. Chen L. (2019). Homeostatic synaptic plasticity as a metaplasticity mechanism—A molecular and cellular perspective. Curr Opin. Eurobiol. 54, 44– 53. 10.1016/j.conb.08010 PMC6361678 30212714 · DOI
  10. Lippard E. T. Nemeroff C. B. (2020). The devastating clinical consequences of child abuse and neglect: increased disease vulnerability and poor treatment response in mood disorders. Am. J. Psychiatry. 177, 20– 36. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.19010020 31537091 PMC6939135 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Lok K. Zhao H. Shen H. Wang Z. Gao X. Zhao W.. (2013). Characterization of the APP/PS1 mouse model of Alzheimer's disease in senescence accelerated background. Neurosci. Lett. 557, 84– 9. 10.1016/j.neulet.10051 24176881 · DOI
  12. Molet J. Heins K. Zhuo X. Mei Y. T. Regev L. Baram T. Z.. (2016). Fragmentation and high entropy of neonatal experience predict adolescent emotional outcome. Transl. Psychiatry. 6, e702. 10.1038/tp.2015.200 26731439 PMC5068874 · DOI
  13. Munton R. P. Vizi S. Mansuy I. M. (2004). The role of protein phosphatase-1 in the modulation of synaptic and structural plasticity. FEBS. Lett. 567, 121– 8. 10.1016/j.febslet.0321 15165904 · DOI
  14. Nicoll R. A. (2017). A brief history of long-term potentiation. Neuron. 93, 281– 90. 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.015 28103477 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Palmer M. J. Irving A. J. Seabrook G. R. Jane D. E. Collingridge G. L. (1997). The group I mGlu receptor agonist DHPG induces a novel form of LTD in the CA1 region of the hippocampus. Neuropharmacology 36, 1517– 32. 10.1016/S0028-3908(97)00181-0 9517422 · DOI
  16. Popkirov S. G. Manahan-Vaughan D. (2011). Involvement of the metabotropic glutamate receptor mGluR5 in NMDA receptor-dependent, learning-facilitated long-term depression in CA1 synapses. Cereb. Cortex. 21, 501– 9. 10.1093/cercor/bhq093 20525770 PMC3041006 · DOI
  17. Privitera L. Hogg E. L. Lopes M. Domingos L. B. Gaestel M. Müller J.. (2022). The MK2 cascade mediates transient alteration in mGlu R-LTD and spatial learning in a murine model of Alzheimer's disease. Aging Cell. 21, e13717. 10.1111/acel.13717 36135933 PMC9577942 · DOI
  18. Sacchetti B. Scelfo B. Tempia F. Strata P. (2004). Long-term synaptic changes induced in the cerebellar cortex by fear conditioning. Neuron. 42, 973– 82. 10.1016/j.neuron.05012 15207241 · DOI
  19. Scelfo B. Sacchetti B. Strata P. (2008). Learning-related long-term potentiation of inhibitory synapses in the cerebellar cortex. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 105, 769– 74. 10.1073/pnas.0706342105 18184813 PMC2206611 · DOI
  20. Simmons S. C. Grecco G. G. Atwood B. K. Nugent F. S. (2022). Effects of prenatal opioid exposure on synaptic adaptations and behaviors across development. Neuropharmacology. 2, 109312. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2022.109312 36334764 PMC10314127 · DOI
  21. Spadoni A. D. Vinograd M. Cuccurazzu B. Torres K. Glynn L. M. Davis E. P.. (2022). Contribution of early-life unpredictability to neuropsychiatric symptom patterns in adulthood. Depress. Anxiety. 39, 706– 17. 10.1002/da.23277 35833573 PMC9881456 · DOI
  22. Stepan J. Dine J. Fenzl T. Polta S. A. von Wolff G. Wotjak C. T.. (2012). Entorhinal theta-frequency input to the dentate gyrus trisynaptically evokes hippocampal CA1LTP. Front. Neural. Circ. 6, 64. 10.3389/fncir.2012.00064 22988432 PMC3439738 · DOI
  23. Südhof T. C. Malenka R. C. (2008). Understanding synapses: past, present, and future. Neuron. 60, 469– 76. 10.1016/j.neuron.10011 18995821 PMC3243741 · DOI
  24. Tan Z. Garduño B. M. Aburto P. F. Chen L. Ha N. Cogram P.. (2022). Cognitively impaired aged Octodon degus recapitulate major neuropathological features of sporadic Alzheimer's disease. Acta. Neuropathol. Commun. 10, 182. 10.1186/s40478-022-01481-x 36529803 PMC9761982 · DOI
  25. Taylor C. J. Ohline S. M. Moss T. Ulrich K. Abraham W. C. (2016). The persistence of long-term potentiation in the projection from ventral hippocampus to medial prefrontal cortex in awake rats. Eur. J. Neurosci. 43, 811– 22. 10.1111/ejn.13167 26750170 · DOI
  26. Wang H. Ardiles A. O. Yang S. Tran T. Posada-Duque R. Valdivia G.. (2016). Metabotropic glutamate receptors induce a form of LTP controlled by translation and arc signaling in the hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 36, 1723– 9. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0878-15.2016 26843652 PMC4737780 · DOI
  27. Zhang Z. Marro S. G. Zhang Y. Arendt K. L. Patzke C. Zhou B.. (2018). The fragile X mutation impairs homeostatic plasticity in human neurons by blocking synaptic retinoic acid signaling. Sci. Translat. Med. 10, eaar4338. 10.1126./scitranslmed.aar4338 30068571 PMC6317709

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nugent, F. S., Li, K. W., & Chen, L.
Affiliations
  • Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (US)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
  • Nugent, Fereshteh S.
  • Li, Ka Wan
  • Chen, Lu
ORCID
Venue
Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Published
2023-05-03
Volume
15
Pages
1204605-1204605
ISSN
1663-3563 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3389/fnsyn.2023.1204605
PMC
PMC10189113
OpenAlex
W4368405082
Cited by
2
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (NS11566001)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS11566001, R21NS120628)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
synaptic plasticity, synaptic dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review