Cited by 392Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research

Opposite effects of fear conditioning and extinction on dendritic spine remodelling.

Lai, Cora Sau Wan, Franke, Thomas F., Gan, Wen-Biao·2012·Nature

Abstract

It is generally believed that fear extinction is a form of new learning that inhibits rather than erases previously acquired fear memories. Although this view has gained much support from behavioural and electrophysiological studies, the hypothesis that extinction causes the partial erasure of fear memories remains viable. Using transcranial two-photon microscopy, we investigated how neural circuits are modified by fear learning and extinction by examining the formation and elimination of postsynaptic dendritic spines of layer-V pyramidal neurons in the mouse frontal association cortex. Here we show that fear conditioning by pairing an auditory cue with a footshock increases the rate of spine elimination. By contrast, fear extinction by repeated presentation of the same auditory cue without a footshock increases the rate of spine formation. The degrees of spine remodelling induced by fear conditioning and extinction strongly correlate with the expression and extinction of conditioned fear responses, respectively. Notably, spine elimination and formation induced by fear conditioning and extinction occur on the same dendritic branches in a cue- and location-specific manner: cue-specific extinction causes formation of dendritic spines within a distance of two micrometres from spines that were eliminated after fear conditioning. Furthermore, reconditioning preferentially induces elimination of dendritic spines that were formed after extinction. Thus, within vastly complex neuronal networks, fear conditioning, extinction and reconditioning lead to opposing changes at the level of individual synapses. These findings also suggest that fear memory traces are partially erased after extinction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature10792

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A fear conditioning paradigm that pairs auditory cues with foot shocks has demonstrated opposite effects in auditory and frontal cortex.

    “For example, a fear conditioning paradigm that pairs auditory cues with foot shocks has demonstrated opposite effects in auditory and frontal cortex.”

    From Spatiotemporal dynamics of dendritic spines in the living brain (2014) · cites this paper as Lai et al., 2012

  • In the fear conditioning paradigm, a spine eliminated during fear conditioning is usually replaced by a spine in its vicinity (within 2 μm) during fear extinction.

    “Similar spatial selectivity of spine dynamics has been observed in the fear conditioning paradigm: a spine eliminated during fear conditioning is usually replaced by a spine in its vicinity (within 2 μm) during fear extinction (Lai et al., 2012).”

    From Spatiotemporal dynamics of dendritic spines in the living brain (2014) · cites this paper as Lai et al., 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lai, C. S. W., Franke, T. F., & Gan, W.-B.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • NYU Langone Health (US)
Corresponding author
Gan, Wen-Biao
Venue
Nature
Published
2012-02-19
Volume
483
Issue
7387
Pages
87-91
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1980452424
Cited by
392
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 23
FWCI
21.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS047325, NS047325)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Keywords
fear conditioning, fear extinction, spine formation, fear memory, reconditioning, layer 5 pyramidal neurons, frontal association cortex, synaptic plasticity
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Animals, Conditioning, Classical, Cues, Electric Stimulation, Extinction, Psychological, Extremities, Fear, Frontal Lobe, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Models, Neurological, Neuronal Plasticity, Pyramidal Cells, Dendritic Spines, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review