Cited by 841Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsNeurology and Historical Studies

A Brief History of Long-Term Potentiation

Open access
Nicoll, Roger A.·2017·Neuron

Abstract

Since the discovery of long-term potentiation (LTP) in 1973, thousands of papers have been published on this intriguing phenomenon, which provides a compelling cellular model for learning and memory. Although LTP has suffered considerable growing pains over the years, LTP has finally come of age. Here the rich history of LTP is reviewed. These are exciting times and the pace of discovery is remarkable.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.015

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LTP is impaired in many rodent models of neurodegenerative disease.

    “LTP is used as an indicator of healthy brain function and is impaired in many rodent models of neurodegenerative disease (Nicoll, 2017).”

    From The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis (2019) · cites this paper as Nicoll, 2017

  • Long-term potentiation (LTP) is brief repetitive synaptic stimulation that results in long-lasting increases in synaptic strength.

    “long-term potentiation (LTP), in which brief repetitive synaptic stimulation results in long-lasting increases in synaptic strength, was gaining popularity as a cellular model for learning and memory (16–22).”

    From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [19]

  • LTP is pathway specific; neighboring inactive synapses fail to potentiate.

    “LTP is pathway specific; neighboring inactive synapses fail to potentiate (19).”

    From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [19]

  • The expression of NMDAR-dependent LTP is primarily postsynaptic, although a minor presynaptic component is difficult to entirely exclude.

    “Although it is difficult to entirely exclude the possibility of a minor presynaptic component of NMDAR-dependent LTP, the evidence is overwhelming that its expression is primarily postsynaptic.”

    From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [19]

  • NMDAR-dependent LTP has been most tightly associated with intact animal behavioral memory.

    “Additionally, NMDAR-dependent LTP has been most tightly associated with intact animal behavioral memory (19, 43–46).”

    From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [19]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nicoll, R. A.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Nicoll, Roger A.
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
93
Issue
2
Pages
281-290
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2574596077
Cited by
841
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 95 · 2024: 96 · 2023: 101 · 2022: 117 · 2021: 111 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 93 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 1
FWCI
9.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Mental Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurology and Historical Studies
Keywords
long-term potentiation, history of neuroscience, synaptic plasticity, learning and memory
MeSH terms
Animals, Hippocampus, Humans, Memory, Neurosciences, Synapses, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Long-Term Potentiation, Pyramidal Cells, Mossy Fibers, Hippocampal, History, 20th Century, History, 21st Century, CA1 Region, Hippocampal, CA3 Region, Hippocampal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review