Cited by 1,401Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlVagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The LF/HF ratio does not accurately measure cardiac sympatho-vagal balance

Open access
Billman, George E.·2013·Frontiers in Physiology

Abstract

OPINION article Front. Physiol., 20 February 2013Sec. Clinical and Translational Physiology Volume 4 - 2013 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2013.00026

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fphys.2013.00026

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 An illustration of the possible non-linear effects of varying cardiac sympathetic and cardiac parasympathetic nerve activity on LF/HF. This graph was constructed using the following formula (derived from a synthesis of the literature, particularly Randall et al., 1991; Taylor et al., 2001; Cohen and Taylor, 2002): LF/HF = (0.5 parasympathetic + 0.25 sympathetic nerve activity)/(0.9 parasympathetic + 0.1 sympathetic nerve activity). The nerve activity was varied from baseline (1 arbitrary unit each) increasing or decreasing by up to a factor of 10 (i.e., from 0.1 to 10 units).
Figure 1 An illustration of the possible non-linear effects of varying cardiac sympathetic and cardiac parasympathetic nerve activity on LF/HF. This graph was constructed using the following formula (derived from a synthesis of the literature, particularly Randall et al., 1991; Taylor et al., 2001; Cohen and Taylor, 2002): LF/HF = (0.5 parasympathetic + 0.25 sympathetic nerve activity)/(0.9 parasympathetic + 0.1 sympathetic nerve activity). The nerve activity was varied from baseline (1 arbitrary unit each) increasing or decreasing by up to a factor of 10 (i.e., from 0.1 to 10 units).CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 65 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,401

Metadata

Authors
Billman, G. E.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Billman, George E.
Venue
Frontiers in Physiology
Published
2013
Volume
4
Pages
26-26
ISSN
1664-042X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2107161633
Cited by
1,401
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 177 · 2025: 140 · 2024: 122 · 2023: 123 · 2022: 134 · 2021: 130 · 2020: 115 · 2019: 107 · 2018: 121 · 2017: 98 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 14
FWCI
30.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Physiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Keywords
LF/HF ratio, heart rate variability, autonomic nervous system

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review