Cited by 2,276Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlCardiac Health and Mental HealthVagus Nerve Stimulation Research

The relationship of autonomic imbalance, heart rate variability and cardiovascular disease risk factors

Thayer, Julian F., Yamamoto, Shelby S., Brosschot, Jos F.·2010·International Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death and disability worldwide. The understanding of the risk factors for CVD may yield important insights into the prevention, etiology, course, and treatment of this major public health concern. Autonomic imbalance, characterized by a hyperactive sympathetic system and a hypoactive parasympathetic system, is associated with various pathological conditions. Over time, excessive energy demands on the system can lead to premature aging and diseases. Therefore, autonomic imbalance may be a final common pathway to increased morbidity and mortality from a host of conditions and diseases, including cardiovascular disease. Heart rate variability (HRV) may be used to assess autonomic imbalances, diseases and mortality. Parasympathetic activity and HRV have been associated with a wide range of conditions including CVD. Here we review the evidence linking HRV to established and emerging modifiable and non-modifiable CVD risk factors such as hypertension, obesity, family history and work stress. Substantial evidence exists to support the notion that decreased HRV precedes the development of a number of risk factors and that lowering risk profiles is associated with increased HRV. We close with a suggestion that a model of autonomic imbalance may provide a unifying framework within which to investigate the impact of risk factors, including psychosocial factors and work stress, on cardiovascular disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijcard.2009.09.543

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thayer, J. F., Yamamoto, S. S., & Brosschot, J. F.
Affiliations
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • Leiden University (NL)
Corresponding author
Thayer, Julian F.
Venue
International Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-05
Volume
141
Issue
2
Pages
122-131
ISSN
0167-5273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2136429434
Cited by
2,276
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 140 · 2025: 151 · 2024: 166 · 2023: 208 · 2022: 170 · 2021: 194 · 2020: 180 · 2019: 174 · 2018: 156 · 2017: 153 · 2016: 148 · 2015: 105 · 2014: 103 · 2013: 95 · 2012: 72
FWCI
6.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
Keywords
autonomic imbalance, heart rate variability, cardiovascular risk factors, sympathetic hyperactivity, parasympathetic dysfunction, hypertension, obesity, family history (medicine), occupational stress, psychosocial factors, cardiovascular disease prevention
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Autonomic Nervous System, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cholesterol, Diabetes Mellitus, Heart Rate, Humans, Hypertension, Risk Factors, Smoking, Stress, Psychological, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Overweight, Sedentary Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review