The DOI matches its Crossref record; 176 of the 176 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transcriptional Regulation of Carotenoid Biosynthesis in Plants: So Many Regulators, So Little Consensus
Open accessAbstract
In plants, the carotenoid biosynthesis pathway (CBP) is essential for the production of photosynthetic and protective pigments, plant hormones, and visual/olfactory attractants for animal pollinators and seed dispersers. The regulation of carotenoid biosynthesis at the transcriptional level is vitally important for all of these functions, and has been the subject of intensive research. Many putative transcriptional regulators, both direct and indirect, have been identified through conventional mutant analysis, transcriptome profiling, yeast-one-hybrid screening, and candidate gene approaches. Despite this progress, our understanding of the transcriptional regulation of carotenoid biosynthesis remains fragmented and incomplete. Frequently, a stimulus or regulator is known, but the mechanism by which it affects transcription has not been elucidated. In other cases, mechanisms have been proposed (such as direct binding of a CBP gene promoter by a transcription factor), but function was tested only in vitro or in heterologous systems, making it unclear whether these proteins actually play a role in carotenoid regulation in their endogenous environments. Even in cases where the mechanism is relatively well understood, regulators are often studied in isolation, either in a single plant species or outside the context of other known regulators. This presents a conundrum: Why so many candidate regulators but so little consensus? Here we summarize current knowledge on transcriptional regulation of the CBP, lay out the challenges contributing to this conundrum, identify remaining knowledge gaps, and suggest future research directions to address these challenges and knowledge gaps.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lescot, M. (2002) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/30.1.325 · Cited by 8,132
S ALT AND D ROUGHT S TRESS S IGNAL T RANSDUCTION IN P LANTS
Zhu, J.-K. (2002) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.091401.143329 · Cited by 5,835
Plant cis-acting regulatory DNA elements (PLACE) database: 1999
Higo, K., Ugawa, Y., Iwamoto, M., & Korenaga, T. (1999) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/27.1.297 · Cited by 3,381
Abscisic Acid: Emergence of a Core Signaling Network
Cutler, S. R., Rodriguez, P. L., Finkelstein, R. R., & Abrams, S. R. (2010) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112122 · Cited by 3,151
Non-Photochemical Quenching. A Response to Excess Light Energy
Müller, P., Li, X.-P., & Niyogi, K. K. (2001) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.125.4.1558 · Cited by 2,840
Gene networks involved in drought stress response and tolerance
Shinozaki, K., & Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erl164 · Cited by 2,632
ABSCISIC ACID BIOSYNTHESIS AND CATABOLISM
Nambara, E., & Marion-Poll, A. (2005) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.56.032604.144046 · Cited by 2,237
Lim, P. O., Kim, H. J., & Gil Nam, H. (2007) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105316 · Cited by 1,978
PHOTOPROTECTION REVISITED:Genetic and Molecular Approaches
Niyogi, K. K. (1999) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.333 · Cited by 1,933
The role of xanthophyll cycle carotenoids in the protection of photosynthesis
Demmig-Adams, B., & Adams, W. W. (1996) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/s1360-1385(96)80019-7 · Cited by 1,673
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- Andrade, 2017, Complex interplays between phytosterols and plastid development, Plant Signal Behav., 12, 10.1080/15592324.2017.1387708 · doi:10.1080/15592324.2017.1387708
- Biswal, 1995, Carotenoid catabolism during leaf senescence and its control by light, J. Photochem. Photobiol. B, Biol., 30, 3, 10.1016/1011-1344(95)07197-A · doi:10.1016/1011-1344(95)07197-a
- Britton, 1989, Chloroplast carotenoids: function, biosynthesis and effects of stress and senescence, 303
- Dalal, 2010, Isolation and functional characterization of lycopene β-cyclase (CYC-B) promoter from Solanum habrochaites, BMC Plant Biol., 10, 10.1186/1471-2229-10-61 · doi:10.1186/1471-2229-10-61
- Dong, 2014, Arabidopsis DE-ETIOLATED1 represses photomorphogenesis by positively regulating phytochrome-interacting factors in the dark, Plant Cell, 26, 3630, 10.1105/tpc.114.130666 · doi:10.1105/tpc.114.130666
- Dong, 2013, A tomato MADS-box transcription factor, SlMADS1, acts as a negative regulator of fruit ripening, J. Plant Physiol., 163, 1026, 10.1104/pp.113.224436 · doi:10.1104/pp.113.224436
- Eriksson, 2004, Effect of the colorless non-ripening mutation on cell wall biochemistry and gene expression during tomato fruit development and ripening, J. Plant Physiol., 136, 4184, 10.1104/pp.104.045765 · doi:10.1104/pp.104.045765
- Fu, 2016, The papaya transcription factor CpNAC1 modulates carotenoid biosynthesis through activating phytoene desaturase genes CpPDS2/4 during fruit ripening, J. Agric. Food Chem., 64, 5454, 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b01020 · doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.6b01020
- Giménez, 2010, Functional analysis of the Arlequin mutant corroborates the essential role of the Arlequin/TAGL1 gene during reproductive development of tomato, PLoS One, 5, 10.1371/journal.pone.0014427 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0014427
- Guo, 2018, A histone deacetylase gene, SlHDA3, acts as a negative regulator of fruit ripening and carotenoid accumulation, Plant Cell Rep., 37, 125, 10.1007/s00299-017-2211-3 · doi:10.1007/s00299-017-2211-3
- Hao, 2015, Auxin response factor SlARF2 is an essential component of the regulatory mechanism controlling fruit ripening in tomato, PLoS Genetics, 11, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005649 · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1005649
- Ito, 2008, DNA-binding specificity, transcriptional activation potential, and the rin mutation effect for the tomato fruit-ripening regulator RIN, Plant J., 55, 212, 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03491.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2008.03491.x
- Jin, 2019, ZmPBF and ZmGAMYB transcription factors independently transactivate the promoter of the maize (Zea mays) β-carotene hydroxylase 2 gene, New Phytol., 222, 793, 10.1111/nph.15614 · doi:10.1111/nph.15614
- Kishimoto, 2018, Regulation of carotenoid pigmentation in corollas of petunia, Plant Mol. Biol. Rep., 36, 632, 10.1007/s11105-018-1107-x · doi:10.1007/s11105-018-1107-x
- Li, 2019, A critical evaluation of the role of ethylene and MADS transcription factors in the network controlling fleshy fruit ripening, New Phytol., 221, 1724, 10.1111/nph.15545 · doi:10.1111/nph.15545
- Liu, 2009, The MYB305 transcription factor regulates expression of nectarin genes in the ornamental tobacco floral nectary, Plant Cell, 21, 2672, 10.1105/tpc.108.060079 · doi:10.1105/tpc.108.060079
- Liu, 2014, Ectopic expression of a BZR1-1D transcription factor in brassinosteroid signalling enhances carotenoid accumulation and fruit quality attributes in tomato, Plant Biotechnol. J., 12, 105, 10.1111/pbi.12121 · doi:10.1111/pbi.12121
- Ma, 2014, Overexpression of tomato SlNAC1 transcription factor alters fruit pigmentation and softening, BMC Plant Biol., 14, 10.1186/s12870-014-0351-y · doi:10.1186/s12870-014-0351-y
- Meng, 2016, Suppression of tomato SlNAC1 transcription factor delays fruit ripening, J. Plant Physiol., 193, 88, 10.1016/j.jplph.2016.01.014 · doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2016.01.014
- Qin, 2012, Unraveling the regulatory network of the MADS box transcription factor RIN in fruit ripening, Plant J., 70, 243, 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04861.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2011.04861.x
- Shima, 2013, Tomato FRUITFULL homologues act in fruit ripening via forming MADS-box transcription factor complexes with RIN, Plant Mol. Biol., 82, 427, 10.1007/s11103-013-0071-y · doi:10.1007/s11103-013-0071-y
- Weng, 2015, The zinc finger transcription factor SlZFP2 negatively regulates abscisic acid biosynthesis and fruit ripening in tomato, J. Plant Physiol., 167, 931, 10.1104/pp.114.255174 · doi:10.1104/pp.114.255174
- Wu, 2019, TERF1 regulates nuclear gene expression through chloroplast retrograde signals, Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 66, 22, 10.1134/S1021443719010205 · doi:10.1134/s1021443719010205
- Xiong, 2019, A tomato B-box protein SlBBX20 modulates carotenoid biosynthesis by directly activating PHYTOENE SYNTHASE 1, and is targeted for 26S proteasome–mediated degradation, New Phytol., 221, 279, 10.1111/nph.15373 · doi:10.1111/nph.15373
- Yang, 2003, Involvement of abscisic acid and cytokinins in the senescence and remobilization of carbon reserves in wheat subjected to water stress during grain filling, Plant Cell Environ., 26, 1621, 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.01081.x · doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.01081.x
- Zhang, 2018, A tomato MADS-box protein, SlCMB1, regulates ethylene biosynthesis and carotenoid accumulation during fruit ripening, Sci. Rep., 8, 3413, 10.1038/s41598-018-21672-8 · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-21672-8
Cited by
Suematsu, K., Tanaka, M., Kurata, R., & Kai, Y. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-77293-7 · Cited by 27
Jia, R., Zhang, R., Gangurde, S. S., Tang, C., Jiang, B., Li, G., & Wang, Z. (2022) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.993682 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Stanley, L., & Yuan, Y.-W.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Plant Science
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2019-08-09
- Volume
- 10
- Pages
- 1017-1017
- ISSN
- 1664-462X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2964308338
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 176
- FWCI
- 8.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transcriptional Regulation of Carotenoid Biosynthesis in Plants: So Many Regulators, So Little Consensus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fpls.2019.01017
- The paper
- Stanley, L., & Yuan, Y.-W. (2019). Transcriptional Regulation of Carotenoid Biosynthesis in Plants: So Many Regulators, So Little Consensus. Frontiers in Plant Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.