Cited by 206Agricultural Science and FertilizationAgriculture, Plant Science, Crop ManagementCrop Yield and Soil Fertility

Exploring Black Soldier Fly Frass as Novel Fertilizer for Improved Growth, Yield, and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Maize Under Field Conditions

Open access
Beesigamukama, Dennis, Mochoge, Benson, Korir, Nicholas K., Fiaboe, Komi K. M., Nakimbugwe, Dorothy, Khamis, Fathiya M., Subramanian, Sevgan, Dubois, Thomas +4 more·2020·Frontiers in Plant Science

Abstract

Black soldier fly frass fertilizer (BSFFF) is increasingly gaining momentum worldwide as organic fertilizer. However, research on its performance on crop production remains largely unknown. Here, we evaluate the comparative performance of BSFFF and commercial organic fertilizer (SAFI) on maize (H513) production. Both fertilizers were applied at the rates of 0, 2.5, 5 and 7.5 t ha-1, and 0, 30, 60 and 100 kg nitrogen (N) ha-1. Mineral fertilizer (urea) was also applied at 0, 30, 60 and 100 kg N ha-1 to establish the N fertilizer equivalence (NFE) of the organic fertilizers. Maize grown in plots treated with BSFFF had the tallest plants and highest chlorophyll contents. Plots treated with 7.5 t ha-1 of BSFFF had 14% higher grain yields than plots treated with a similar rate of SAFI. There was a 27% and 7% increase in grain yields in plots treated with 100 kg N ha-1 of BSFFF compared to those treated with equivalent rates of SAFI and urea fertilizers, respectively. Application of BSFFF at 7.5 t ha-1 significantly increased N uptake by up to 23% compared to the equivalent rate of SAFI. Likewise, application of BSFFF at 100 kg N ha-1 increased maize N uptake by 76% and 29% compared to SAFI and urea, respectively. Maize treated with BSFFF at 2.5 t ha-1 and 30 kg N ha-1 had higher nitrogen recovery efficiencies compared to equivalent rates of SAFI. The agronomic N use efficiency (AEN) of maize treated with 2.5 t ha-1 of BSFFF was 2.4 times higher than the value achieved using an equivalent rate of SAFI. Also, the AEN of maize grown using 30 kg N ha-1 was 27% and 116% higher than the values obtained using equivalent rates of SAFI and urea fertilizers, respectively. The NFE of BSFFF (108%) was 2.5 times higher than that of SAFI. Application rates of 2.5 t ha-1 and 30 kg N ha-1 of BSFFF were found to be effective in improving maize yield, while double rates of SAFI were required. Our findings demonstrate that BSFFF is a promising and sustainable alternative to commercial fertilizers for increased maize production.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpls.2020.574592

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Maize treated with composted BSFL frass at 2.5 t ha−1 and 30 kg N ha−1 has higher nitrogen recovery efficiencies than commercial fertilisers.

    “The maize treated with composted BSFL frass at 2.5 t ha−1 and 30 kg N ha−1 has higher nitrogen recovery efficiencies than commercial fertilisers.”

    From Potential Applications of Frass Derived from Black Soldier Fly Larvae Treatment of Food Waste: A Review (2022) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Abstract reports higher nitrogen recovery efficiencies at both BSF frass application rates, but its comparison is specifically with equivalent rates of SAFI, a commercial organic fertilizer. The Results section on apparent nitrogen recovery reports that 30 kg N ha−1 of urea had higher recovery than most treatments in the short rain season, so the claim is too broad if “commercial fertilisers” includes urea. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Maize plots treated with BSFL frass produced bigger plants with highest chlorophyll concentration and grain yields than commercially treated maize plots.

    “The maize plots treated with BSFL frass produced bigger plants with the highest chlorophyll concentration and grain yields than the commercially treated maize plots.”

    From Potential Applications of Frass Derived from Black Soldier Fly Larvae Treatment of Food Waste: A Review (2022) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Results sections on leaf chlorophyll and grain yield report that some BSF-frass treatments produced the highest chlorophyll concentrations and grain yields, including values above those for the commercial organic fertilizer SAFI. But the plant-height Results do not support the claim that frass produced bigger plants overall: SAFI produced the tallest plants in the fertilizer-type comparisons and in the long-season comparison at equivalent nitrogen rates. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • BSFL frass has promising potential as an organic fertiliser because it shows similar performance to commercial fertilisers in increasing maize production.

    “BSFL frass has a promising potential as an organic fertiliser since it shows similar performance to commercial fertilisers in increasing maize production [38].”
  • Harvested BSFL frass after two weeks of bioconversion and composted using heap methods for five weeks yields mature and stable frass compost.

    “The study of Beesigamukama et al. [38] has stated that harvested BSFL frass after two weeks of bioconversion and composted the BSFL frass using the heap methods for five weeks to obtain mature and stable frass compost.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. Adin Yéton B. G. Aliou S. Noël O. Guillaume L. A. Attanda M. I. Victor A. C. (2019). Decomposition and nutrient release pattern of agro-processing by-products biodegraded by fly larvae in Acrisols. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 00, 1– 12. 10.1080/03650340.2019.1572118 · DOI
  2. Baligar V. C. Fageria N. K. He Z. L. (2001). Nutrient Use Efficiency in Plants. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 32, 921– 950. 10.1007/978-3-319-10635-9 · DOI
  3. Banaeian N. Zangeneh M. (2011). Study on energy efficiency in corn production of Iran. Energy 36, 5394– 5402. 10.1016/j.energy.2011.06.052 · DOI
  4. Bowden C. Spargo J. Evanylo G. (2007). Mineralization and n fertilizer equivalent value of composts as assessed by tall fescue (festuca arundinacea). Compost Sci. Util. 15, 111– 118. 10.1080/1065657X.2007.10702320 · DOI
  5. Choi S. Hassanzadeh N. (2019). BSFL Frass: A Novel Biofertilizer for Improving Plant Health While Minimizing Environmental Impact. Candian Sci. fair J. 2, 41– 46. 10.18192/csfj.v2i220194146 · DOI
  6. Ch’Ng H. Y. Ahmed O. H. Majid N. M. A. (2016). Improving phosphorus availability, nutrient uptake and dry matter production of Zea mays L. on a tropical acid soil using poultry manure biochar and pineapple leaves compost. Exp. Agric. 52, 447– 465. 10.1017/S0014479715000204 · DOI
  7. Cobo J. G. Dercon G. Cadisch G. (2010). Nutrient balances in African land use systems across different spatial scales: A review of approaches, challenges and progress. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 136, 1– 15. 10.1016/j.agee.2009.11.006 · DOI
  8. De Notaris C. Sørensen P. Møller H. B. Wahid R. Eriksen J. (2018). Nitrogen fertilizer replacement value of digestates from three green manures. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 112, 355– 368. 10.1007/s10705-018-9951-5 · DOI
  9. Diener S. Studt Solano N. M. Roa Gutiérrez F. Zurbrügg C. Tockner K. (2011). Biological treatment of municipal organic waste using black soldier fly larvae. Waste Biomass Valorization 2, 357– 363. 10.1007/s12649-011-9079-1 · DOI
  10. Ebanyat P. de Ridder N. de Jager A. Bekunda M. A. GIller K. E. (2010). Drivers of land use change and household determinants of sustainability in smallholder farming systems of Eastern Uganda. Popul. Environ. 31, 474– 506. 10.1007/s11111-010-0104-2 20628448 PMC2889287 · DOI
  11. Ebanyat P. (2009). A road to food? Efficacy of nutrient management options targeted to heterogeneous soilscapes in the Teso farming system, Uganda. English (Wageningen, Netherlands: Wageningen University press).
  12. Fageria V. D. (2001). Nutrient interactions in crop plants. J. Plant Nutr. 24, 1269– 1290. 10.1081/PLN-100106981 · DOI
  13. FAO (2017). The state of food and agriculture. Leveraging food systems for inclusive rural transformation. (Rome, Italy: FAO publishing group). 10.2307/2938399 · DOI
  14. Gachene C. Kimaru G. (2003). Soil fertility and land productivity: A guide for extension workers in the eastern Africa region (Nairobi, Kenya: English Press Limited).
  15. Gachimbi L. N. van Keulen H. Thuranira E. G. Karuku A. M. de Jager A. Nguluu S. (2005). Nutrient balances at farm level in Machakos (Kenya), using a participatory nutrient monitoring (NUTMON) approach. Land Use Policy 22, 13– 22. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.07.002 · DOI
  16. Grigatti M. Boanini E. Cavani L. Ciavatta C. Marzadori C. (2015). Phosphorus in Digestate-Based Compost: Chemical Speciation and Plant-Availability. Waste Biomass Valorization 6, 481– 493. 10.1007/s12649-015-9383-2 · DOI
  17. Hijbeek R. ten Berge H. F. M. Whitmore A. P. Barkusky D. Schröder J. J. van Ittersum M. K. (2018). Nitrogen fertiliser replacement values for organic amendments appear to increase with N application rates. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 110, 105– 115. 10.1007/s10705-017-9875-5 · DOI
  18. Houben D. Daoulas G. Faucon M. P. Dulaurent A. M. (2020). Potential use of mealworm frass as a fertilizer: Impact on crop growth and soil properties. Sci. Rep. 10, 1– 9. 10.1038/s41598-020-61765-x 32170150 PMC7069999 · DOI
  19. Jackson M. L. (1973). Soil Chemical Analysis (New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd.), 498.
  20. Kagata H. Ohgushi T. (2012). Positive and negative impacts of insect frass quality on soil nitrogen availability and plant growth. Popul. Ecol. 54, 75– 82. 10.1007/s10144-011-0281-6 · DOI
  21. Keino L. Baijukya F. Ng’etich W. Otinga A. N. Okalebo J. R. Njoroge R. (2015). Nutrients limiting soybean (glycine max l) growth in acrisols and ferralsols of Western Kenya. PloS One 10, 1– 20. 10.1371/journal.pone.0145202 PMC4696802 26716825 · DOI
  22. Kihara J. Nziguheba G. Zingore S. Coulibaly A. Esilaba A. Kabambe V. (2016). Understanding variability in crop response to fertilizer and amendments in sub-Saharan Africa. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 229, 1– 12. 10.1016/j.agee.2016.05.012 27489394 PMC4913530 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Kimetu J. M. Mugendi D. N. Palm C. A. Mutuo P. K. Gachengo C. N. Bationo A. (2004). Nitrogen fertilizer equivalencies of organics of differing quality and optimum combination with inorganic nitrogen source in Central Kenya. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 68, 127– 135. 10.1023/B:FRES.0000019043.33580.a6 · DOI
  24. Lalander C. H. Fidjeland J. Diener S. Eriksson S. Vinnerås B. (2015). High waste-to-biomass conversion and efficient Salmonella spp. reduction using black soldier fly for waste recycling. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 35, 261– 271. 10.1007/s13593-014-0235-4 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Lalor S. T. J. Schröder J. J. Lantinga E. A. Oenema O. Kirwan L. Schulte R. P. O. (2011). Nitrogen Fertilizer Replacement Value of Cattle Slurry in Grassland as Affected by Method and Timing of Application. J. Environ. Qual. 40, 362– 373. 10.2134/jeq2010.0038 21520743 · DOI
  26. Liverpool-Tasie L. S. O. Omonona B. T. Sanou A. Ogunleye W. O. (2017). Is increasing inorganic fertilizer use for maize production in SSA a profitable proposition? Evidence Nigeria. Food Policy 67, 41– 51. 10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.09.011 28413245 PMC5384440 · DOI
  27. Makkar H. P. S. Tran G. Heuzé V. Ankers P. (2014). State-of-the-art on use of insects as animal feed. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 197, 1– 33. 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.07.008 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Muchena F. N. Onduru D. D. Gachini G. N. de Jager A. (2005). Turning the tides of soil degradation in Africa: Capturing the reality and exploring opportunities. Land Use Policy 22, 23– 31. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.07.001 · DOI
  29. Mucheru-Muna M. Mugendi D. Kung’u J. Mugwe J. Bationo A. (2007). Effects of organic and mineral fertilizer inputs on maize yield and soil chemical properties in a maize cropping system in Meru South District, Kenya. Agrofor. Syst. 69, 189– 197. 10.1007/s10457-006-9027-4 · DOI
  30. Mucheru-Muna M. Mugendi D. Pypers P. Mugwe J. Kung’U J. Vanlauwe B. (2014). Enhancing maize productivity and profitability using organic inputs and mineral fertilizer in central Kenya small-hold farms. Exp. Agric. 50, 250– 269. 10.1017/S0014479713000525 · DOI
  31. Musinguzi P. Ebanyat P. Tenywa J. S. Basamba T. A. Tenywa M. M. Mubiru D. N. (2016). Critical soil organic carbon range for optimal crop response to mineral Fertiliser nitrogen on a Ferralsol. Exp. Agric. 52, 635– 653. 10.1017/S0014479715000307 · DOI
  32. Musyoka M. W. Adamtey N. Muriuki A. W. Cadisch G. (2017). Effect of organic and conventional farming systems on nitrogen use efficiency of potato, maize and vegetables in the Central highlands of Kenya. Eur. J. Agron. 86, 24– 36. 10.1016/j.eja.2017.02.005 · DOI
  33. Musyoka M. W. Adamtey N. Bünemann E. K. Muriuki A. W. Karanja E. N. Mucheru-Muna M. (2019). Nitrogen release and synchrony in organic and conventional farming systems of the Central Highlands of Kenya. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 113, 283– 305. 10.1007/s10705-019-09978-z · DOI
  34. Ndambi O. A. Pelster D. E. Owino J. O. de Buisonjé F. Vellinga T. (2019). Manure Management Practices and Policies in Sub-Saharan Africa: Implications on Manure Quality as a Fertilizer. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 3, 29. 10.3389/fsufs.2019.00029 · DOI
  35. Nelson D. W. Sommers L. E. (1982). Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. Methods of soil analysis Part 2: Chemical and microbiological properties. Am. Soc Agron. 9, 539– 579. 10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c29 · DOI
  36. Oonincx D. G. A. B. van Huis A. van Loon J. J. A. (2015). Nutrient utilisation by black soldier flies fed with chicken, pig, or cow manure. J. Insects as Food Feed 1, 131– 139. 10.3920/JIFF2014.0023 · DOI
  37. Poveda J. Jiménez-Gómez A. Saati-Santamaría Z. Usategui-Martín R. Rivas R. García-Fraile P. (2019). Mealworm frass as a potential biofertilizer and abiotic stress tolerance-inductor in plants. Appl. Soil Ecol. 142, 110– 122. 10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.04.016 · DOI
  38. Rufino M. C. Tittonell P. van Wijk M. T. Castellanos-Navarrete A. Delve R. J. de Ridder N. (2007). Manure as a key resource within smallholder farming systems: Analysing farm-scale nutrient cycling efficiencies with the NUANCES framework. Livest. Sci. 112, 273– 287. 10.1016/j.livsci.2007.09.011 · DOI
  39. Rufino M. C. Dury J. Tittonell P. van Wijk M. T. Herrero M. Zingore S. (2011). Competing use of organic resources, village-level interactions between farm types and climate variability in a communal area of NE Zimbabwe. Agric. Syst. 104, 175– 190. 10.1016/j.agsy.2010.06.001 · DOI
  40. Shumo M. Osuga I. M. Khamis F. M. Tanga C. M. Fiaboe K. K. M. Subramanian S. (2019). The nutritive value of black soldier fly larvae reared on common organic waste streams in Kenya. Sci. Rep. 9, 1– 13. 10.1038/s41598-019-46603-z 31300713 PMC6626136 · DOI
  41. Tittonell P. Corbeels M. Van Wijk M. T. Vanlauwe B. Giller K. E. (2008a). Combining organic and mineral fertilizers for integrated soil fertility management in smallholder farming systems of Kenya: Explorations using the crop-soil model FIELD. Agron. J. 100, 1511– 1526. 10.2134/agronj2007.0355 · DOI
  42. Tittonell P. Vanlauwe B. Corbeels M. Giller K. E. (2008b). Yield gaps, nutrient use efficiencies and response to fertilisers by maize across heterogeneous smallholder farms of western Kenya. Plant Soil 313, 19– 37. 10.1007/s11104-008-9676-3 · DOI
  43. Tully K. Sullivan C. Weil R. Sanchez P. (2015). The State of Soil Segradation in Sub-Saharan Africa: Baselines, Trajectories, and Solutions. Sustainability 7, 6523– 6552. 10.3390/su7066523 · DOI
  44. Uzoh I. M. Igwe C. A. Okebalama C. B. Babalola O. O. (2019). Legume-maize rotation effect on maize productivity and soil fertility parameters under selected agronomic practices in a sandy loam soil. Sci. Rep. 9, 1– 9. 10.1038/s41598-019-43679-5 31189881 PMC6561941 · DOI
  45. van Huis A. (2013). Potential of Insects as Food and Feed in Assuring Food Security. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 58, 563– 583. 10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153704 23020616 · DOI
  46. van Middelkoop J. C. Holshof G. (2017). Nitrogen Fertilizer Replacement Value of Concentrated Liquid Fraction of Separated Pig Slurry Applied to Grassland. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 48, 1132– 1144. 10.1080/00103624.2017.1323101 · DOI
  47. Vanlauwe B. Coyne D. Gockowski J. Hauser S. Huising J. Masso C. (2014). Sustainable intensification and the African smallholder farmer. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 8, 15– 22. 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.06.001 · DOI
  48. Vanlauwe B. Descheemaeker K. Giller K. E. Huising J. Merckx R. Nziguheba G. (2015). Integrated soil fertility management in sub-Saharan Africa: unravelling local adaptation. Soil J. 1, 491– 508. 10.5194/soil-1-491-2015 · DOI
  49. Wortmann C. S. Kaizzi K. C. Maman N. Cyamweshi A. Dicko M. Garba M. (2019). Diagnosis of crop secondary and micro-nutrient deficiencies in sub-Saharan Africa. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 113, 127– 140. 10.1007/s10705-018-09968-7 · DOI
  50. Yuan Z. Cao Q. Zhang K. Ata-Ul-Karim S. T. Tan Y. Zhu Y. (2016). Optimal leaf positions for SPAD meter measurement in rice. Front. Plant Sci. 7, 719. 10.3389/fpls.2016.00719 27303416 PMC4880590 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beesigamukama, D., Mochoge, B., Korir, N. K., Fiaboe, K. K. M., Nakimbugwe, D., Khamis, F. M., Subramanian, S., Dubois, T., Musyoka, M. W., Ekesi, S., Kelemu, S., & Tanga, C. M.
Affiliations
  • Kenyatta University (KE)
  • International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (KE)
  • Makerere University (UG)
Corresponding author
  • Beesigamukama, Dennis
  • Tanga, Chrysantus M.
Venue
Frontiers in Plant Science
Published
2020-09-23
Volume
11
Pages
574592-574592
ISSN
1664-462X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3089050291
Cited by
206
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 2
FWCI
9.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Plant Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
  • Rockefeller Foundation (108866-001, 2018 FOD 009)
  • Styrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete (108866-001, 2018 FOD 009)
  • Government of the Republic of Kenya (2018 FOD 009, 108866-001)
  • International Development Research Centre (2018 FOD 009, 108866-001)
  • Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  • Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (2018 FOD 009, 108866-001)
  • Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (2018 FOD 009, 108866-001)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Agriculture, Plant Science, Crop Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
Keywords
black soldier fly frass, organic fertilizer, maize, nitrogen use efficiency, nitrogen uptake, nitrogen recovery efficiency, nitrogen agronomic efficiency, urea, commercial organic fertilizer, grain yield, chlorophyll content, sustainable agriculture, crop growth and yield, maize yield

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review