The DOI matches its Crossref record; 258 of the 258 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Applications of Multi-Omics Technologies for Crop Improvement
Open accessAbstract
Multiple “omics” approaches have emerged as successful technologies for plant systems over the last few decades. Advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) have paved a way for a new generation of different omics, such as genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics. However, metabolomics, ionomics, and phenomics have also been well-documented in crop science. Multi-omics approaches with high throughput techniques have played an important role in elucidating growth, senescence, yield, and the responses to biotic and abiotic stress in numerous crops. These omics approaches have been implemented in some important crops including wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), soybean (Glycine max), tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), maize (Zea mays L.), millet (Setaria italica L.), cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.),Medicago truncatula, and rice (Oryza sativa L.). The integration of functional genomics with other omics highlights the relationships between crop genomes and phenotypes under specific physiological and environmental conditions. The purpose of this review is to dissect the role and integration of multi-omics technologies for crop breeding science. We highlight the applications of various omics approaches, such as genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, phenomics, and ionomics, and the implementation of robust methods to improve crop genetics and breeding science. Potential challenges that confront the integration of multi-omics with regard to the functional analysis of genes and their networks as well as the development of potential traits for crop improvement are discussed. The panomics platform allows for the integration of complex omics to construct models that can be used to predict complex traits. Systems biology integration with multi-omics datasets can enhance our understanding of molecular regulator networks for crop improvement. In this context, we suggest the integration of entire omics by employing the “phenotype to genotype” and “genotype to phenotype” concept. Hence, top-down (phenotype to genotype) and bottom-up (genotype to phenotype) model through integration of multi-omics with systems biology may be beneficial for crop breeding improvement under conditions of environmental stresses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers
Williams, J. G. K., Kubelik, A. R., Livak, K. J., Rafalski, J. A., & Tingey, S. V. (1990) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/18.22.6531 · Cited by 13,067
AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting
Vos, P., Hogers, R., Bleeker, M., Reijans, M., Lee, T. V. D., Hornes, M., Friters, A., Pot, J., Paleman, J., Kuiper, M., et al. (1995) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/23.21.4407 · Cited by 12,401
The language of covalent histone modifications
Strahl, B. D., & Allis, C. D. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/47412 · Cited by 8,679
Chlorophyll Fluorescence: A Probe of Photosynthesis In Vivo
Baker, N. R. (2008) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092759 · Cited by 4,639
Metabolomics—the link between genotypes and phenotypes
Fiehn, O. (2002) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1023/a:1013713905833 · Cited by 3,445
Protein and polymer analyses up to m/z 100 000 by laser ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry
Tanaka, K., Waki, H., Ido, Y., Akita, S., Yoshida, Y., Yoshida, T., & Matsuo, T. (1988) · Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/rcm.1290020802 · Cited by 3,175
Metabolomics — the link between genotypes and phenotypes
Fiehn, O. (2002) · Functional Genomics · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0448-0_11 · Cited by 3,167
Tettelin, H., Masignani, V., Cieslewicz, M. J., Donati, C., Medini, D., Ward, N. L., Angiuoli, S. V., Crabtree, J., Jones, A. L., Durkin, A. S., et al. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0506758102 · Cited by 2,631
Cell Signaling during Cold, Drought, and Salt Stress
Xiong, L., Schumaker, K. S., & Zhu, J.-K. (2002) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.000596 · Cited by 2,372
Shotgun bisulphite sequencing of the Arabidopsis genome reveals DNA methylation patterning
Cokus, S. J., Feng, S., Zhang, X., Chen, Z., Merriman, B., Haudenschild, C. D., Pradhan, S., Nelson, S. F., Pellegrini, M., & Jacobsen, S. E. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06745 · Cited by 2,256
Cited by
Multi-omics revolution to promote plant breeding efficiency
Mahmood, U., Li, X., Fan, Y., Chang, W., Niu, Y., Li, J., Qu, C., & Lu, K. (2022) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.1062952 · Cited by 145
Self-citationMetabolomic Profiling Reveals the Anti-Herbivore Mechanisms of Rice (Oryza sativa)
Gu, C., Zhang, Y., Wang, M., Lin, Y., Zeng, B., Zheng, X., Song, Y., & Zeng, R. (2024) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms25115946 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, Y., Saand, M. A., Huang, L., Abdelaal, W. B., Zhang, J., Wu, Y., Li, J., Sirohi, M. H., & Wang, F.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Plant Science
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2021-09-03
- Volume
- 12
- Pages
- 563953-563953
- ISSN
- 1664-462X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3198031523
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 258
- FWCI
- 13.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Applications of Multi-Omics Technologies for Crop Improvement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fpls.2021.563953
- The paper
- Yang, Y., Saand, M. A., Huang, L., Abdelaal, W. B., Zhang, J., Wu, Y., Li, J., Sirohi, M. H., & Wang, F. (2021). Applications of Multi-Omics Technologies for Crop Improvement. Frontiers in Plant Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.563953
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.