Cited by 17Algal biology and biofuel productionAquaculture Nutrition and GrowthInnovations in Aquaponics and Hydroponics Systems

Two-phase microalgae cultivation for RAS water remediation and high-value biomass production

Open access
Villanova, Valeria, Roques, Jonathan Armand Charles, Forghani, Bita, Shaikh, Kashif Mohd, Undeland, Ingrid, Spetea, Cornelia·2023·Frontiers in Plant Science

Abstract

The overall goal of this study was to provide solutions to innovative microalgae-based technology for wastewater remediation in a cold-water recirculating marine aquaculture system (RAS). This is based on the novel concept of integrated aquaculture systems in which fish nutrient-rich rearing water will be used for microalgae cultivation. The produced biomass can be used as fish feed, while the cleaned water can be reused, to create a highly eco-sustainable circular economy. Here, we tested three microalgae species Nannochloropis granulata ( Ng ), Phaeodactylum tricornutum ( Pt ), and Chlorella sp ( Csp ) for their ability to remove nitrogen and phosphate from the RAS wastewater and simultaneously produce high-value biomass, i.e., containing amino acids (AA), carotenoids, and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs). A high yield and value of biomass were achieved for all species in a two-phase cultivation strategy: i) a first phase using a medium optimized for best growth (f/2 14x, control); ii) a second “stress” phase using the RAS wastewater to enhance the production of high-value metabolites. Ng and Pt performed best in terms of biomass yield (i.e., 5-6 g of dry weight, DW.L -1 ) and efficient cleaning of the RAS wastewater from nitrite, nitrate, and phosphate (i.e., 100% removal). Csp produced about 3 g L -1 of DW and reduced efficiently only nitrate, and phosphate (i.e., about 76% and 100% removal, respectively). The biomass of all strains was rich in protein (30-40 % of DW) containing all the essential AA except Methionine. The biomass of all three species was also rich in PUFAs. Finally, all tested species are excellent sources of antioxidant carotenoids, including fucoxanthin ( Pt ), lutein ( Ng and Csp ) and β -carotene ( Csp ). All tested species in our novel two-phase cultivation strategy thus showed great potential to treat marine RAS wastewater and provide sustainable alternatives to animal and plant proteins with extra added values.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpls.2023.1186537

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Brazil B. L. Summerfelt S. T. Libey G. S. (1996). “ Application of ozone to recirculating aquaculture systems,” Proceeding from the Successes and Failures in Commercial Recirculating Aquaculture Conference. Roanoke, VA. (152 Riley-Robb Hall, Ithaca, New York: Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Service) 1996.
  2. Chen S. (2002). Recirculating systems effluents and treatments. In: Tumasso J. (ed). Aquaculture and the Environment in the United States. A Chapter of the World Aquaculture Society. (Baton Rouge: US Aquaculture Society), pp. 119– 140.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Villanova, V., Roques, J. A. C., Forghani, B., Shaikh, K. M., Undeland, I., & Spetea, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
Corresponding author
  • Villanova, Valeria
  • Roques, Jonathan Armand Charles
Venue
Frontiers in Plant Science
Published
2023-06-12
Volume
14
Pages
1186537-1186537
ISSN
1664-462X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4380367111
Cited by
17
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Plant Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Nova Science Publishers (Nova Science Publishers, Inc.) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission (HORIZON2020, 844909)
  • Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education (MG2019-8483)
  • Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas (2018-01839, 2020-00867)
  • Vetenskapsrådet (2018-)
  • Göteborgs Universitet
  • Kungl. Skogs- och Lantbruksakademien
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (20KK0244)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Innovations in Aquaponics and Hydroponics Systems
Keywords
microalgae cultivation, recirculating aquaculture system, aquaculture wastewater treatment, nitrogen removal, phosphate removal, two-phase cultivation, Phaeodactylum tricornutum, Chlorella, fish feed, carotenoids, polyunsaturated fatty acids, amino acids, circular economy, integrated aquaculture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review