Cited by 225Sport Psychology and PerformanceSports Dynamics and BiomechanicsSports and Physical Education Research

Quiet Eye Training Facilitates Competitive Putting Performance in Elite Golfers

Open access
Vine, Samuel J., Moore, Lee J., Wilson, Mark R.·2011·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of a brief quiet eye (QE) training intervention aimed at optimizing visuomotor control and putting performance of elite golfers under pressure, and in real competition. Twenty-two elite golfers (mean handicap 2.7) recorded putting statistics over 10 rounds of competitive golf before attending training individually. Having been randomly assigned to either a QE training or Control group, participants were fitted with an Applied Science Laboratories Mobile Eye tracker and performed 20 baseline (pre-test) putts from 10 ft. Training consisted of video feedback of their gaze behavior while they completed 20 putts; however the QE-trained group received additional instructions related to maintaining a longer QE period. Participants then recorded their putting statistics over a further 10 competitive rounds and re-visited the laboratory for retention and pressure tests of their visuomotor control and putting performance. Overall, the results were supportive of the efficacy of the QE training intervention. QE duration predicted 43% of the variance in putting performance, underlying its critical role in the visuomotor control of putting. The QE-trained group maintained their optimal QE under pressure conditions, whereas the Control group experienced reductions in QE when anxious, with subsequent effects on performance. Although their performance was similar in the pre-test, the QE-trained group holed more putts and left the ball closer to the hole on missed putts than their Control group counterparts in the pressure test. Importantly, these advantages transferred to the golf course, where QE-trained golfers made 1.9 fewer putts per round, compared to pre-training, whereas the Control group showed no change in their putting statistics. These results reveal that QE training, incorporated into a pre-shot routine, is an effective intervention to help golfers maintain control when anxious.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00008

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Tierney D. E. Coop R. H. (1998). “A bivariate probability model for putting proficiency,” in Science and Golf III: Proceedings of the 1998 World Scientific Congress of Golf, eds. Farally M. R. Cochran A. J. (Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics), 385– 394
  2. Vine S. J. Wilson M. R. (2010). Quiet eye training helps to maintain effective attentional control and performance under pressure. J. Appl. Sport Psychol. 22, 361– 376 10.1080/10413200.2010.495106 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vine, S. J., Moore, L. J., & Wilson, M. R.
Affiliations
University of Exeter (GB)
Corresponding author
Wilson, Mark R.
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2011
Volume
2
Pages
8-8
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2121979339
Cited by
225
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 13
FWCI
34.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Repository (University of Gloucestershire) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Repository (University of Gloucestershire) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure (University of Bath) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Exeter
  • Economic and Social Research Council (RES-187-24-0002)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Sports and Physical Education Research
Keywords
quiet eye training, putting performance, elite golfers, visuomotor control, gaze behavior, video feedback, performance retention, transfer of training, eye tracking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review