The DOI matches its Crossref record; 175 of the 175 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The perception of odor objects in everyday life: a review on the processing of odor mixtures
Open accessAbstract
Smelling monomolecular odors hardly ever occurs in everyday life, and the daily functioning of the sense of smell relies primarily on the processing of complex mixtures of volatiles that are present in the environment (e.g., emanating from food or conspecifics). Such processing allows for the instantaneous recognition and categorization of smells and also for the discrimination of odors among others to extract relevant information and to adapt efficiently in different contexts. The neurophysiological mechanisms underpinning this highly efficient analysis of complex mixtures of odorants is beginning to be unraveled and support the idea that olfaction, as vision and audition, relies on odor-objects encoding. This configural processing of odor mixtures, which is empirically subject to important applications in our societies (e.g., the art of perfumers, flavorists, and wine makers), has been scientifically studied only during the last decades. This processing depends on many individual factors, among which are the developmental stage, lifestyle, physiological and mood state, and cognitive skills; this processing also presents striking similarities between species. The present review gathers the recent findings, as observed in animals, healthy subjects, and/or individuals with affective disorders, supporting the perception of complex odor stimuli as odor objects. It also discusses peripheral to central processing, and cognitive and behavioral significance. Finally, this review highlights that the study of odor mixtures is an original window allowing for the investigation of daily olfaction and emphasizes the need for knowledge about the underlying biological processes, which appear to be crucial for our representation and adaptation to the chemical environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development
Gibson, E. J. (1973) · Leonardo · doi:10.2307/1572721 · Cited by 2,487
Combinatorial Receptor Codes for Odors
Malnic, B., Hirono, J., Sato, T., & Buck, L. B. (1999) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80581-4 · Cited by 2,316
Visualizing an Olfactory Sensory Map
Mombaerts, P., Wang, F., Dulac, C., Chao, S. K., Nemes, A., Mendelsohn, M., Edmondson, J., & Axel, R. (1996) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81387-2 · Cited by 2,000
Or83b Encodes a Broadly Expressed Odorant Receptor Essential for Drosophila Olfaction
Larsson, M. C., Domingos, A. I., Jones, W. D., Chiappe, M. E., Amrein, H., & Vosshall, L. B. (2004) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.08.019 · Cited by 1,407
Allelic inactivation regulates olfactory receptor gene expression
Chess, A., Simon, I., Cedar, H., & Axel, R. (1994) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(94)90562-2 · Cited by 1,077
Dissociated neural representations of intensity and valence in human olfaction
Anderson, A. K., Christoff, K., Stappen, I., Panitz, D., Ghahremani, D. G., Glover, G., Gabrieli, J. D. E., & Sobel, N. (2003) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1001 · Cited by 1,054
A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning.
Pearce, J. M. (1987) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.94.1.61 · Cited by 1,046
Two-Photon Calcium Imaging Reveals an Odor-Evoked Map of Activity in the Fly Brain
Wang, J. W., Wong, A. M., Flores, J., Vosshall, L. B., & Axel, R. (2003) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00004-7 · Cited by 801
The Psychophysics of Sensory Function
Stevens, S. S. (2012) · Sensory Communication · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262518420.003.0001 · Cited by 780
Identification of a Testicular Odorant Receptor Mediating Human Sperm Chemotaxis
Spehr, M., Gisselmann, G., Poplawski, A., Riffell, J. A., Wetzel, C. H., Zimmer, R. K., & Hatt, H. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1080376 · Cited by 769
Cited by
Olfactory Sensing and Navigation in Turbulent Environments
Reddy, G., Murthy, V. N., & Vergassola, M. (2022) · Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics · doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031720-032754 · Cited by 100
Barba, C., Beno, N., Guichard, E., & Thomas-Danguin, T. (2018) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.02.152 · Cited by 99
Antagonistic interactions between odorants alter human odor perception
Fukutani, Y., Abe, M., Saito, H., Eguchi, R., Tazawa, T., de March, C. A., Yohda, M., & Matsunami, H. (2023) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2023.04.072 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Thomas-Danguin, T., Sinding, C., Romagny, S., El Mountassir, F., Atanasova, B., Le Berre, E., Le Bon, A.-M., & Coureaud, G.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Psychology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2014-06-02
- Volume
- 5
- Pages
- 504-504
- ISSN
- 1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2128174730
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 175
- FWCI
- 7.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The perception of odor objects in everyday life: a review on the processing of odor mixtures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00504
- The paper
- Thomas-Danguin, T., Sinding, C., Romagny, S., El Mountassir, F., Atanasova, B., Le Berre, E., Le Bon, A.-M., & Coureaud, G. (2014). The perception of odor objects in everyday life: a review on the processing of odor mixtures. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00504
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.