Cited by 152Health disparities and outcomesPublic Health and Social InequalitiesEmployment and Welfare Studies

Predicting self-rated mental and physical health: the contributions of subjective socioeconomic status and personal relative deprivation

Open access
Callan, Mitchell J., Kim, Hyunji, Matthews, William J.·2015·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Lower subjective socioeconomic status (SSS) and higher personal relative deprivation (PRD) relate to poorer health. Both constructs concern people's perceived relative social position, but they differ in their emphasis on the reference groups people use to determine their comparative disadvantage (national population vs. similar others) and the importance of resentment that may arise from such adverse comparisons. We investigated the relative utility of SSS and PRD as predictors of self-rated physical and mental health (e.g., self-rated health, stress, health complaints). Across six studies, self-rated physical and mental health were on the whole better predicted by measures of PRD than by SSS while controlling for objective socioeconomic status (SES), with SSS rarely contributing unique variance over and above PRD and SES. Studies 4-6 discount the possibility that the superiority of PRD over SSS in predicting health is due to psychometric differences (e.g., reliability) or response biases between the measures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01415

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Crosby F. J. Muehrer P. Loewenstein G. (1986). Relative deprivation and explanation: models and concepts, in Relative Deprivation and Social Comparison: Vol. 4. The Ontario Symposium, eds Olson J. M. Herman C. P. Zanna M. P. (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum), 17– 32.
  2. Krosnick J. A. Presser S. (2010). Question and questionnaire design, in Handbook of Survey Research, 2nd Edn., eds Mars-den P. V. Wright J. D. (Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited), 263– 314.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Callan, M. J., Kim, H., & Matthews, W. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Essex (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Callan, Mitchell J.
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2015-09-22
Volume
6
Pages
1415-1415
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1841582128
Cited by
152
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7
FWCI
10.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure (University of Bath) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • The University of Bath Online Publications Store (The University of Bath) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Leverhulme Trust (RPG-2013-148)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
Keywords
subjective socioeconomic status, personal relative deprivation, self-rated health, mental health, physical health, objective socioeconomic status, social comparison, resentment, health complaints, stress, health prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review