Cited by 128Language Development and DisordersAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild and Animal Learning Development

The contribution of grammar, vocabulary and theory of mind in pragmatic language competence in children with autistic spectrum disorders

Open access
Andrés-Roqueta, Clara, Katsos, Napoleon·2017·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Pragmatic Competence in Children with ASD and Other Developmental Disorders

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00996

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pragmatics likely engages a variety of neural mechanisms, including both the language network and other brain regions.

    “Pragmatics likely engages a variety of neural mechanisms [174, 175, 176], including both the language network and other brain regions.”

    From Dissociating language and thought in large language models (2024) · cites this paper as [174]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. de Villiers P. A. Burns F. Pearson B. (2003). The role of language in the theory of mind development of language impaired children: complementing theories, in Proceedings of the 27th Boston University Conference on Child Development, eds Beachley B. Brown A. Conlin F. (Cambridge, MA: Cascadilla), 232– 242.
  2. Recanati F. (2004). Literal Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Sperber D. (1994). Understanding verbal understanding, in What is Intelligence? ed Khalfa J. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 179– 198.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andrés-Roqueta, C., & Katsos, N.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2017-06-15
Volume
8
Pages
996-996
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2618295620
Cited by
128
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1
FWCI
14.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Repositori UJI (Universitat Jaume I) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Funders
  • Universitat Jaume I (UJI-A2016-12)
  • British Academy (SG-47135)
  • Generalitat Valenciana (GV/2015/092)
  • Arts and Humanities Research Council (AH/N004671/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, grammar, vocabulary, theory of mind, children, developmental disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review