The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring Values in Environmental Research: A Test of an Environmental Portrait Value Questionnaire
Open accessAbstract
Four human values are considered to underlie individuals' environmental beliefs and behaviors: biospheric (i.e., concern for environment), altruistic (i.e., concern for others), egoistic (i.e., concern for personal resources) and hedonic values (i.e., concern for pleasure and comfort). These values are typically measured with an adapted and shortened version of the Schwartz Value Survey (SVS), to which we refer as the Environmental-SVS (E-SVS). Despite being well-validated, recent research has indicated some concerns about the SVS methodology (e.g., comprehensibility, self-presentation biases) and suggested an alternative method of measuring human values: The Portrait Value Questionnaire (PVQ). However, the PVQ has not yet been adapted and applied to measure values most relevant to understand environmental beliefs and behaviors. Therefore, we tested the Environmental-PVQ (E-PVQ) - a PVQ variant of E-SVS -and compared it with the E-SVS in two studies. Our findings provide strong support for the validity and reliability of both the E-SVS and E-PVQ. In addition, we find that respondents slightly preferred the E-PVQ over the E-SVS (Study 1). In general, both scales correlate similarly to environmental self-identity (Study 1), energy behaviors (Studies 1 and 2), pro-environmental personal norms, climate change beliefs and policy support (Study 2). Accordingly, both methodologies show highly similar results and seem well-suited for measuring human values underlying environmental behaviors and beliefs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schwartz, S. H. (1992) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60281-6 · Cited by 14,619
New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior
Stern, P. C. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00175 · Cited by 8,682
Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888 · Cited by 7,611 · cited 1×
“2This is in line with the principles of compatibility (Ajzen and Fishbein, 1977; Ajzen, 2005) that proposes that attitude-behavior relations are only found when elements, such as target and action, strongly overlap with each other.”
Result(1988) · Cited by 6,825
Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human Values?
Schwartz, S. H. (1994) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.x · Cited by 5,793
An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values
Schwartz, S. H. (2012) · Online Readings in Psychology and Culture · doi:10.9707/2307-0919.1116 · Cited by 4,147
(1999) · Western CEDAR (Western Washington University) · Cited by 3,944
Toward a universal psychological structure of human values.
Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.53.3.550 · Cited by 3,790
Refining the theory of basic individual values.
Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., Ramos, A., Verkasalo, M., Lönnqvist, J.-E., Demirutku, K., et al. (2012) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0029393 · Cited by 2,962
The Value Basis of Environmental Concern
Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1994) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb02420.x · Cited by 2,240
Cited by
Bouman, T., Steg, L., & Perlaviciute, G. (2021) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.04.010 · Cited by 100
Self-citationCarson, J. E., & Westerman, J. W. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15021167 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Bouman, T., Steg, L., & Kiers, H. A. L.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Psychology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2018-04-23
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 564-564
- ISSN
- 1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2800653202
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 58
- FWCI
- 32.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring Values in Environmental Research: A Test of an Environmental Portrait Value Questionnaire. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00564
- The paper
- Bouman, T., Steg, L., & Kiers, H. A. L. (2018). Measuring Values in Environmental Research: A Test of an Environmental Portrait Value Questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00564
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.