CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,953

Refining the theory of basic individual values.

Schwartz, Shalom H., Cieciuch, Jan, Vecchione, Michele, Davidov, Eldad, Fischer, Ronald, Beierlein, Constanze, Ramos, Alice, Verkasalo, Markku +4 more·2012·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
DOI 10.1037/a0029393
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0029393

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Schwartz's theory of basic human values specifies which value types load on moral commitment; benevolence and universalism are the value types the framework predicts at high D5.

    “Schwartz's theory of basic human values (47, 48) specifies which value types load on moral commitment. Benevolence, understood as concern for the welfare of close others or the in-group, and universalism, understood as concern extended to all people, are the value types the framework predicts at high D5.”

    From Volunteerism as a multidimensional form of human prosocial engagement (2026) · cites this paper as [48]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Bardi, A., Lee, J. A., Towfigh, N., Soutar, G. (2009). The structure of intra-individual value change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 913-929.
  2. Bilsky, W., Janik, M., & Schwartz, S. H. (2011). The structural organization of human values: Evidence from three rounds of the European Social Survey (ESS). Journal of Cross- Cultural Psychology, 42, 759-776.
  3. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
  4. Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.
  5. Bubeck, M., & Bilsky, W. (2004). Value structure at an early age. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 63, 31-41.
  6. Cieciuch, J., & Schwartz, S. H. (2012). Assessing the number of distinct basic values and their structure in Poland. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1-8.
  7. Cohrs, J.C., Moschner, B., Maes, J., Kielmann, S. (2005). The motivational bases of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation: Relations to values and attitudes in the aftermath of September 11, 2001. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1-10.
  8. Commandeur, J. J. F. (1991). Matching configurations. Leiden, The Netherlands: DSWO Press.
  9. Davidov, E., Schmidt, P., & Schwartz, S. H. (2008). Bringing values back in: The adequacy of the European social survey to measure values in 20 countries. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 420-445.
  10. Dobson, A. (2003). Citizenship and the environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  11. Döring, A. K., Blauensteiner, A., Aryus, K., Drögekamp, L. & Bilsky, W. (2010). Assessing values at an early age: The picture-based value survey for children (PBVS-C) Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 439-448.
  12. Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A. 2x2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501-519.
  13. Grouzet, F. M. E., Kasser, T., Ahuvia, A., Fernández-Dols, J. M., Kim, Y., Lau, S., Ryan, R. M., Saunders, S., Schmuck, P., & Sheldon, K. M. (2005). The structure of goal contents across 15 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 800-816.
  14. Lee, J. A., Soutar, G. N., & Louviere, J. (2008). An alternative approach to measuring Schwartz's values: The best-worst scaling approach. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90, 335-347.
  15. Levy, S. (1985). Lawful roles of facets in social theories. In D. Canter (Ed.), The facet approach to social research (pp. 59-96). New York: Springer-Verlag.
  16. Liem, G. A. D., Martin, A. J., Nair, E., Bernardo, A. B. I., & Prasetya, P. H. (2011). Content and structure of values in middle adolescence: Evidence from Singapore, the Philippines, Indonesia, and Australia. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 146-154.
  17. Muthén, B., & Muthén, L. (1998-2008). Mplus User's Guide. Fifth edition. Los Angeles. CA: Muthén & Muthén.
  18. Perrinjaquet, A., Furrer, O., Usunier, J.-C., Cestre, G., & Valette-Florence, P. (2007). A test of the circumplex structure of human values. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 820- 840.
  19. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method bias in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.
  20. Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., Schwartz, S. H., & Knafo, A. (2002). The Big Five personality factors and personal values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 789-801.
  21. Saris, W. E., & Gallhofer, I. N. (2007). Design, evaluation, and analysis of questionnaires for survey research. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  22. Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the content and structure of values? Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19-45.
  23. Tamayo & J. B. Porto (Eds.), Valores e comportamento nas organizações [Values and behavior in organizations] pp. 21-55. Petrópolis, Brazil: Vozes.
  24. Schwartz, S. H. (2005b). Robustness and fruitfulness of a theory of universals in individual human values. In A. Tamayo & J. B. Porto (Eds.), op. cit. pp. 56-95.
  25. Schwartz, S. H. (2009). Basic values: How they motivate and inhibit prosocial behavior. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature (pp. 221-241). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  26. Schwartz, S. H., & Bardi, A. (2001). Value hierarchies across cultures: Taking a similarities perspective. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 32, 268-290.
  27. Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1987). Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 550-562.
  28. Schwartz, S. H., & Boehnke, K. (2004). Evaluating the structure of human values with confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 230-255.
  29. Schwartz, S. H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., Harris, M. & Owens, V. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 519-542.
  30. Schwartz, S. H. & Sagiv, L. (1995). Identifying culture-specifics in the content and structure of values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 92-116.
  31. Schwartz, S. H., Verkasalo, M., Antonovsky, A., & Sagiv, L. (1997). Value priorities and social desirability: Much substance, some style. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 3-18.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., Ramos, A., Verkasalo, M., Lönnqvist, J.-E., Demirutku, K., Dirilen-Gumus, O., & Konty, M.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2012-10
Volume
103
Issue
4
Pages
663-688
ISSN
  • 1939-1315
  • 0022-3514
DOI
10.1037/a0029393
Cited by
1,953
References
7
Language
en
Funders
National Research University–Higher School of Economics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review