Cited by 100Climate Change Communication and PerceptionEnvironmental Education and SustainabilityClimate Change Policy and Economics

From values to climate action

Open access
Bouman, Thijs, Steg, Linda, Perlaviciute, Goda·2021·Current Opinion in Psychology

Abstract

To mitigate anthropogenic climate change, it is important to know what motivates individuals to support and take climate action. Values reflect universal, general, desirable goals which guide individuals' preferences and actions. Stronger biospheric values (caring about the environment), in particular, predict stronger engagement in climate action. Although many individuals have strong biospheric values, contextual barriers can inhibit their climate actions. Notably, policies and contextual changes that reduce contextual barriers can motivate and enable individuals to act on their biospheric values. In addition, public participation may better engage public values in climate policies and actions as to increase their acceptability. Finally, correcting biases that others have weaker biospheric values than oneself may also motivate individuals to support and take climate action.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.04.010

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The perception that social group members would endorse eco-friendly values increases the likelihood of an individual adopting or sharing those values.

    “Bouman et al. discuss how the perception that social group members would endorse eco-friendly values increases the likelihood of an individual adopting or sharing those values [51].”

    From Climate Distress: A Review of Current Psychological Research and Practice (2023) · cites this paper as [51]

    The Conclusion says people who perceive fellow group members to endorse biospheric values strongly are more likely to support and engage in climate action. The section “Perceptions of others’ values also matter” likewise says people are motivated to act consistently with perceived ingroup values. Neither passage says that this perception makes individuals more likely to adopt or share the values themselves. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 87 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Beierle TC, Konisky DM: Values, conflict, and trust in partici- patory environmental planning. J Pol Anal Manag 2000, 19: 587-602.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bouman, T., Steg, L., & Perlaviciute, G.
Affiliations
University of Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Bouman, Thijs
Venue
Current Opinion in Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-12
Volume
42
Pages
102-107
ISSN
2352-250X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3162439473
Cited by
100
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 3
FWCI
2.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (651.001.022, 651.001.011)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
Keywords
biospheric values, climate action, climate change mitigation, pro-environmental behavior, contextual barriers, climate policy, citizen participation, anthropogenic climate change
MeSH terms
Humans, Climate Change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review