Cited by 59Early Childhood Education and DevelopmentChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentChild Development and Digital Technology

The Theoretical and Methodological Opportunities Afforded by Guided Play With Young Children

Open access
Yu, Yue, Shafto, Patrick, Bonawitz, Elizabeth, Yang, Scott C.-H., Golinkoff, Roberta M., Corriveau, Kathleen H., Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy, Xu, Fei·2018·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

For infants and young children, learning takes place all the time and everywhere. How children learn best both in and out of school has been a long-standing topic of debate in education, cognitive development, and cognitive science. Recently, guided play has been proposed as an integrative approach for thinking about learning as a child-led, adult-assisted playful activity. The interactive and dynamic nature of guided play presents theoretical and methodological challenges and opportunities. Drawing upon research from multiple disciplines, we discuss the integration of cutting-edge computational modeling and data science tools to address some of these challenges, and highlight avenues towards an empirically grounded, computationally precise and ecologically valid framework of guided play.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01152

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Caregivers can supply AI systems with targeted contextual information because they best understand a child's cognitive level.

    “As those who best understand a child's cognitive level, caregivers can also supply AI systems with targeted contextual information [23].”

    From A Systematic Review of Generative AI in K–12: Mapping Goals, Activities, Roles, and Outcomes via the 3P Model (2025) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Introduction says adult guidance should be tailored to a child’s needs and skill level. The Coupling Computational Models and Data Science Tools section says data from expert teachers have been used to train algorithms, but it does not say caregivers best understand a child’s cognitive level or can supply AI systems with targeted contextual information. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Breazeal C. L. (2002). Designing Sociable Robots (Intelligent Robotics and Autonomous Agents). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  2. Dewey J. (1933). How we think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective thinking to the Educational Process Vol. 35 Lexington, MA: DC. Heath and company 64.
  3. Haden C. A. Cohen T. Uttal D. Marcus M. (2016). “Building learning: narrating and transferring experiences in a children’s museum,” in Cognitive Development in Museum Settings: Relating Research and Practice eds Sobel D. Jipson J. (New York, NY: Psychology Press) 84– 103.
  4. Hirsh-Pasek K. Golinkoff R. (2003). Einstein Never used Flash Cards. Emmaus, PA: Rodale Press.
  5. Shafto P. Goodman N. (2008). “Teaching games: statistical sampling assumptions for learning in pedagogical situations,” in Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society Austin, TX.
  6. Vygotsky L. S. (1934/1987). “Thinking and speech,” in L. S. Vygotsky, Collected Works Vol. 1 eds Rieber R. Carton A. (New York, NY: Plenum) 39– 285.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yu, Y., Shafto, P., Bonawitz, E., Yang, S. C.-H., Golinkoff, R. M., Corriveau, K. H., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Xu, F.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • University of Delaware (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Yu, Yue
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2018-07-17
Volume
9
Pages
1152-1152
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2883110088
Cited by
59
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
14.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OpenBU (Boston University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • TUScholarShare (Temple University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Science Foundation (SMA-1640816)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
Keywords
guided play, young children, children's learning, child-led learning, computational modeling, data science, cognitive development, play-based learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review