The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fancying the New Rich and Famous? Explicating the Roles of Influencer Content, Credibility, and Parental Mediation in Adolescents’ Parasocial Relationship, Materialism, and Purchase Intentions
Open accessAbstract
While social media influencers are gleaning increasing trust and investment from brands, advertisers, and followers, insights on the role of influencers in adolescents' relationship formation and consumption behaviors are still rare. Drawing on the literatures of influencer content value, influencer credibility, parental mediation, and parasocial relationship (PSR), this study proposed a conceptual model that expounds the appeal of influencers among adolescents. To test the model, we administered an online survey - recruited in proportion to demographic quotas (i.e., age, gender and ethnicity) - among 500 United States adolescents (aged 10- to 19-years old) via Qualtrics panel. Results revealed that, the entertainment value of influencer-generated content, influencer expertise, trustworthiness, attractiveness, and followers' perceived similarity to their favorite influencers, are positively related to the perceived PSR between adolescent followers and their favorite influencers, which in turn, are associated with adolescents' materialistic views and purchase intentions. We also explored the role of parental mediation of adolescents' social media use in their PSR with influencers. Results indicate that, neither active mediation nor restrictive mediation is related to the PSR between adolescents and influencers. Active mediation is negatively associated with adolescents' materialism, whereas restrictive mediation is positively related to adolescents' purchase intentions toward influencer-promoted products. This study proposed and tested a comprehensive conceptual model that accounts for the role of influencers in adolescent followers' materialism and purchase intentions. This study yields three major theoretical contributions. First, it adopts and applies the concept of PSR from the literature of media psychology to explicate influencers' appeal among adolescents, which lays a theoretical foundation for future research on the impact of influencers. Second, it advances the current literature on social media influencers by specifying key contributing factors for the development of adolescents' PSR with influencers. Lastly, it explores the roles of the two facets of parental mediation - active and restrictive mediation - in the appeal of influencers among adolescents, which offers directions for future research of parental mediation in the influencer context.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983) · Cited by 79,866
Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling
Tabri, N., & Elliott, C. M. (2012) · Canadian Graduate Journal of Sociology and Criminology · doi:10.15353/cgjsc-rcessc.v1i1.25 · Cited by 38,891
Mass Communication and Para-Social Interaction
Horton, D., & Richard Wohl, R. (1956) · Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049 · Cited by 4,380
Ohanian, R. (1990) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.1990.10673191 · Cited by 4,043
The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness
Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/266350 · Cited by 3,543
(1981) · Cited by 3,038
Mishra, S., & Datta-Gupta, A. (2018) · Applied Statistical Modeling and Data Analytics · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-803279-4.00005-5 · Cited by 2,997
Lou, C., & Yuan, S. (2019) · Journal of Interactive Advertising · doi:10.1080/15252019.2018.1533501 · Cited by 2,795
Self-citationDe Veirman, M., Cauberghe, V., & Hudders, L. (2017) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/02650487.2017.1348035 · Cited by 2,548
Cited by
Hudders, L., De Jans, S., & De Veirman, M. (2021) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/02650487.2020.1836925 · Cited by 685
Masuda, H., Han, S. H., & Lee, J. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121246 · Cited by 576
Yuan, S., & Lou, C. (2020) · Journal of Interactive Advertising · doi:10.1080/15252019.2020.1769514 · Cited by 543
Self-citationLou, C. (2022) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2021.1880345 · Cited by 455
Self-citationImpact of Social Media Influencers on Customer Engagement and Purchase Intention: A Meta-Analysis
Ao, L., Bansal, R., Pruthi, N., & Khaskheli, M. B. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15032744 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Lou, C., & Kim, H. K.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Psychology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2019-11-15
- Volume
- 10
- Pages
- 2567-2567
- ISSN
- 1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2988583874
- Cited by
- 391
- References
- 88
- FWCI
- 40.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fancying the New Rich and Famous? Explicating the Roles of Influencer Content, Credibility, and Parental Mediation in Adolescents’ Parasocial Relationship, Materialism, and Purchase Intentions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02567
- The paper
- Lou, C., & Kim, H. K. (2019). Fancying the New Rich and Famous? Explicating the Roles of Influencer Content, Credibility, and Parental Mediation in Adolescents’ Parasocial Relationship, Materialism, and Purchase Intentions. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02567
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.