Cited by 24Emotional Intelligence and PerformanceTeam Dynamics and PerformanceEgo Development and Educational Practices

Team emotional intelligence in working contexts: development and validation of the team-trait meta mood scale (T-TMMS)

Open access
Aritzeta, Aitor, Mindeguia, Rosa, Soroa, Goretti, Balluerka, Nekane, Gorostiaga, Arantxa, Elorza, Unai, Aliri, Jone·2020·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

The collective construct of Team Emotional Intelligence (TEI) has been widely used and discussed. However, although several studies have examined the relationship between individual emotional intelligence and transformational leadership, few reports have explored the TEI of leadership teams. The aim of this study was to develop a scale to measure TEI, developing and validating the T-TMMS in a sample of 1,746 participants grouped into 152 leadership teams. The research design of the study was cross-sectional, and, in order to observe reliability as well as the construct, convergent, and predictive validity of the scale, we conducted an internal consistency analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, as well as a correlation and hierarchical linear regression analysis. The T-TMMS showed a three-factor structure (Attention, Clarity, and Repair), with adequate internal consistency, temporal stability, and convergent validity. We also examined the relationship between TEI and organizational performance. The limitations and implications of this new scale for organizational contexts are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00893

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Aritzeta et al. [112], Balamohan et al. [113], and Flores et al. [114] have all three subcategories (EI, leadership, and work teams) in common.

    “Finally, Aritzeta et al. [112], Balamohan et al. [113], and Flores et al. [114] have all three subcategories in common.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aritzeta, A., Mindeguia, R., Soroa, G., Balluerka, N., Gorostiaga, A., Elorza, U., & Aliri, J.
Affiliations
  • University of the Basque Country (ES)
  • Mondragon Unibertsitatea (ES)
Corresponding author
Aritzeta, Aitor
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2020-05-26
Volume
11
Pages
893-893
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3030462481
Cited by
21
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 4
FWCI
2.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eRepository Mondragon University (Mondragon University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Communities in ADDI (Universidad del Pais Vasco) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Communities in ADDI (University of the Basque Country) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Eusko Jaurlaritza (IT892‐16)
  • Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
  • Diputación Foral de Gipuzkoa (Bateratzen, exp.2011-DIP1-000022-01)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotional Intelligence and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Ego Development and Educational Practices
Keywords
team emotional intelligence, scale development, leadership teams, transformational leadership, attention, clarity, repair, organizational performance, construct validity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review