Cited by 76COVID-19 and Mental HealthResilience and Mental HealthMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

The Effect of the Fear of COVID-19 on Healthcare Professionals’ Psychological Adjustment Skills: Mediating Role of Experiential Avoidance and Psychological Resilience

Open access
Seçer, İsmail, Ulaş, Sümeyye, Karaman-Özlü, Zeynep·2020·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

As the COVID-19 outbreak is rapidly spreading all over the world, it's secondary consequences will negatively affect both societies and individuals. The target group, expected to be exposed to the secondary negative consequences most intensely during the pandemic process and afterward, is undoubtedly the healthcare professionals. In this research, the impact of the fear that healthcare professionals in Turkey developed against the outbreak of COVID-19 on their psychological adjustment skills is examined, and in this context, the mediating role of experiential avoidance and psychological resilience is examined. In this context, an answer was sought for the question "Does experiential avoidance and psychological resilience have a mediating role in the impact of COVID-19 fear on psychological adjustment skills of healthcare professionals?" The research was carried out with a total of 370 healthcare professionals reached via online data collection method. Structural equation modeling was used in the data analysis process, and as a result, it was determined that the fear of COVID-19 had a negative effect on the psychological adjustment in healthcare professionals; however, psychological resilience was found to have a protective function that limits this effect, and experiential avoidance has a risk factor that aggravates this effect. Findings obtained from the research are discussed in the context of the literature.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.561536

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Ekşi H. Kaya Ç Kuşcu B. (2018). Multıdımensıonal experıentıal avoıdance questıonnaıre-30: adaptatıon and psychometrıc propertıes of the Turkısh versıon. Annual Congress: ICRE. 483– 487. Available online at: https://www.academia.edu/37852402/Çok_Boyutlu_Yaşantısal_Kaçınma_Ölçeği0_un_Türkçeye_uyarlanması_ve_psikometrik_Özellikleri_Multidimensional_Experiential_Avoidance_Questionnaire30_Adaptation_and_Psychometric_Properties_of_the_Turkish (accessed May 10, 2020).
  2. Seçer İ (2015). Practical data analysis with SPSS and LISREL. Ankara: Anı Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seçer, İ., Ulaş, S., & Karaman-Özlü, Z.
Affiliations
  • Atatürk University (TR)
  • Gümüşhane University (TR)
Corresponding author
Seçer, İsmail
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2020-10-21
Volume
11
Pages
561536-561536
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3094134323
Cited by
75
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 30
FWCI
5.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Gümüşhane University Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
fear of COVID-19, healthcare workers, psychological adjustment, experiential avoidance, psychological resilience, mediating effect, occupational stress, mental health during pandemic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review