Cited by 122Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Experiential avoidance and well-being: A daily diary analysis

Machell, Kyla A., Goodman, Fallon R., Kashdan, Todd B.·2015·Cognition and Emotion

Abstract

Experiential avoidance (EA) is a regulatory strategy characterised by efforts to control or avoid unpleasant thoughts, feelings and bodily sensations. Most studies of EA have used trait measures without considering the effects of EA on psychological functioning in naturalistic settings. To address this gap, we used daily diary methodology to examine the influence of EA of anxiety on everyday well-being. For two weeks, 89 participants provided daily reports of EA, positive and negative affect, enjoyment of daily events and meaning in life (MIL). Daily EA predicted higher negative affect, lower positive affect, less enjoyment of daily events (exercising, eating food and listening to music) and less MIL. The effect of EA on positive affect was not accounted for by the amount of negative affect experienced. Our daily measure of EA was a stronger predictor of daily well-being than a traditional trait measure (The Acceptance and Action Questionnaire). Taken together, results offer insights into the adverse effects of EA on daily well-being and suggest that EA is a context-specific regulatory strategy that might be best captured using a state-dependent measure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02699931.2014.911143

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Machell, K. A., Goodman, F. R., & Kashdan, T. B.
Affiliations
George Mason University (US)
Corresponding author
Kashdan, Todd B.
Venue
Cognition and Emotion
Published
2014-05-06
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
351-359
ISSN
  • 0269-9931 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0600
OpenAlex
W2015584502
Cited by
122
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
5.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognition & Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
experiential avoidance, well-being, daily affect, positive affect, negative affect, meaning in life, anxiety, emotion regulation, Acceptance and Action Questionnaire
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adaptation, Psychological, Affect, Anxiety, Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Medical Records, Surveys and Questionnaires, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review