Cited by 38Virtual Reality Applications and ImpactsEmotion and Mood RecognitionHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Breathing Biofeedback for Police Officers in a Stressful Virtual Environment: Challenges and Opportunities

Open access
Brammer, Jan C., van Peer, Jacobien M., Michela, Abele, van Rooij, Marieke M. J. W., Oostenveld, Robert, Klumpers, Floris, Dorrestijn, Wendy, Granic, Isabela +1 more·2021·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

As part of the Dutch national science program “Professional Games for Professional Skills” we developed a stress-exposure biofeedback training in virtual reality (VR) for the Dutch police. We aim to reduce the acute negative impact of stress on performance, as well as long-term consequences for mental health by facilitating physiological stress regulation during a demanding decision task. Conventional biofeedback applications mainly train physiological regulation at rest. This might limit the transfer of the regulation skills to stressful situations. In contrast, we provide the user with the opportunity to practice breathing regulation while they carry out a complex task in VR. This setting poses challenges from a technical – (real-time processing of noisy biosignals) as well as from a user-experience perspective (multi-tasking). We illustrate how we approach these challenges in our training and hope to contribute a useful reference for researchers and developers in academia or industry who are interested in using biosignals to control elements in a dynamic virtual environment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.586553

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • VR and BF successfully enhanced breathing training.

    “Furthermore, VR and BF successfully enhanced breathing training (Brammer et al., 2021;Rockstroh et al., 2021).”

    From Frontal Electroencephalography Asymmetry and Desynchronized Functional Connectivity Associated with Long-Term and Short-Term Breathing Training (2026) · cites this paper as Brammer et al., 2021

    In ‘Challenge 1: Choice of the Biofeedback Parameter > Prioritizing Controllability’ (page unavailable), the pilot data show lower breathing rates and higher biofeedback scores in sessions with biofeedback, as well as improvement across sessions. This supports a benefit from biofeedback in the VR training, but the paper describes the findings as suggestive and does not isolate whether VR itself enhanced breathing training. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brammer, J. C., van Peer, J. M., Michela, A., van Rooij, M. M. J. W., Oostenveld, R., Klumpers, F., Dorrestijn, W., Granic, I., & Roelofs, K.
Affiliations
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Corresponding author
Brammer, Jan C.
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2021-03-12
Volume
12
Pages
586553-586553
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3136023411
Cited by
38
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6
FWCI
4.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
biofeedback, respiratory control, police officers, occupational stress, virtual reality training, biomedical signal processing, multitasking, mental health, decision-making under stress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review